What is Digg?54 Comments
- eekthekat, on 03/26/2008, -1/+51Ooookaaaaay, so he took stills from a movie and arranged them so that the brightest ones are in the middle. Whoop-D-Frickin-Do
- pathy, on 03/26/2008, -6/+34Am I the only one hoping it was a guy with a tiny camera attached to his *****?
- TwwIX, on 03/26/2008, -1/+19Talk about ***** useless.
- cderry, on 03/26/2008, -4/+19Yes.
- digitalpencil, on 03/26/2008, -1/+14well that sucked..
- lukasvermeer, on 03/26/2008, -2/+10Definitely yes.
- WoollyMittens, on 03/26/2008, -0/+6Do not want.
- linkinparker04, on 03/26/2008, -2/+8Yes.
- jakatan, on 03/26/2008, -1/+6Quick, someone call CSI to enhance this photo!
- riskybeats, on 03/26/2008, -2/+7Ug! Ug oog ug ug! LOL
Translation: Welcome to digg, cave dwelling primate. - inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+3the design of a woman deep throating.
- goerg, on 03/26/2008, -1/+4and what is it good for?
- JesseRuth89, on 03/26/2008, -0/+3really wtf is this, and how is it on the front page?
- alokrsx, on 03/26/2008, -3/+6Ahh! Who cares??
- cderry, on 03/26/2008, -2/+5Agreed. If he made some sort of design that would be a little different.
- dbdev, on 03/26/2008, -0/+3what a waste of time...
- john2kx, on 03/26/2008, -0/+3Front page story + less than 100 diggs = inevitable complaint about the digg algorithm!
- comradeTJH, on 03/26/2008, -1/+3After some beeping from a computer with miraculous omnipotent software on it the whole movie would appear in full HD even with 5.1 surround sound.
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+2I'm going to create a website and arrange users submissions by popularity
- WoollyMittens, on 03/26/2008, -0/+257 diggs + 1 comment + keywords: Deep and Throat = Front page!
- doctechnical, on 03/26/2008, -3/+4It's pr0n! It's Art! It's a dessert topping! It's a floorwax!
- ssj2119, on 03/26/2008, -3/+4..I don't
- jggube, on 03/26/2008, -5/+6Ahhh... I see what you did there! Sneaky, Sneaky! :)
- Seth024, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1Safe/Suitable For Work
- deadseksy, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1I don't really want to look at it if it's safe for work.
- artzxp, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1why would you digg this?
- kaosethema, on 03/29/2008, -0/+1WOMT
- HauntedTank, on 03/26/2008, -1/+2But it´s unfappable pr0n!
- DanThe1Man, on 03/26/2008, -1/+2If that is some kind of magic eye thing, I don't want to try to see it.
- Joliman, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1The eye tends to be drawn to the brightest thing in a frame. Filmmakers tend to light their subjects (often people's faces) accordingly and put them right in the middle.
What I want to know is: why are they squares? Shouldn't Star Wars at least be a rectangle? - dawgma, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1It's interesting that the films all have nearly the same range as one another... I wonder if this effect reflects a naturally subconscious decision by directors/editors to maintain a particular range of luminosity when creating a film...
- Aux88, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1Honestly, how many people on digg have actually seen Deep Throat to really give a ***** about this?
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1Isn't it obvious.
- PurpleSfinx, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1Just mash your keypad a few times, get a program that makes your computer emit a high pitched beep depending on CPU usage, and don't touch your mouse. Hell, throw your mouse out. Oh, and replace your whiteyellow light bulbs with light blue ones - blue = science.
- brownspank, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1So ***** Worthless.
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1It's wasted porn
- propagandhi, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1Was there some point to this?
- Tochi, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1sure it is, I'll even set it as my desktop wallpaper!
- Ragarnok, on 03/26/2008, -0/+1It's called a Fibroscopy, and it ain't pretty ;)
- username7D8, on 03/26/2008, -1/+1excuse my ignorance but what the hell is SFW?
- DiggLive, on 03/26/2008, -2/+2Watergate?
- username7D8, on 03/26/2008, -0/+0excellent thx... haha I wish more people warned me about that! ;-)
- stonklit, on 03/26/2008, -0/+0Here's a good example of something marked "NSFW" for no apparent reason: http://digg.com/arts_culture/STOP_DARTH_WEINSTEIN_ ...
In reality, people need to realize, "Hey, it's the internet. Anything goes." and assume NSFW, but people want others to think and decide for them. Especially on user generated content sites. - inactive, on 03/26/2008, -1/+1Seeing that movie doesn't make this something to give a ***** about.
- Sibre, on 03/26/2008, -0/+0SFW = Safe for Work
NSFW = NOT Safe for Work - Verz, on 03/26/2008, -5/+4**Not all that SFW
- stonklit, on 03/26/2008, -1/+0Single Female White
In all seriousness, it's a flag for people who are dicking around at their ***** jobs to show them that it's okay, this article doesn't contain swearing or explicit content. Something they fear their uptight boss would somehow fire them for.
You know, because somehow looking at "offensive" material somehow overrides your skills in your job. And if it does, again, ***** job. - stonklit, on 03/26/2008, -1/+0Deeeeeep throaaaaaat.
Deeper than DEEEEEEP your throaaaaaat. - Jemm, on 03/26/2008, -2/+1Good for you, Art.
- burnflare, on 03/26/2008, -4/+2nice!
-
Show 51 - 54 of 54 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is