2 Comments
- Dimensio, on 07/07/2008, -0/+5"If "Science relies on the formulation and testing of hypotheses through repeatable experimentation, not on revealed truth about conversations in the Garden of Eden," then what repeatable experiments have confirmed evolution?"
Are you unaware of extensive evidence for the validity of the theory of evolution: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ ?
"The truth about evolution is that it is mainly believed because of conversations between atheists, not because of scientific experiments. This makes it faith based at least. "
Please justify your assertion.
"Since the US Supreme Court recognizes atheism as a religion, then evolution is really a religious doctrine."
Please explain why you have introduced the irrelevant subject of atheism; even if it is true that atheism is a religion, I do not understand how that relates to the theory of evolution, nor do I understand how evolution becomes a "religious doctrine". Evolution is not a part of atheism, and evolution is not inherently atheistic. - Iamite, on 07/07/2008, -3/+0If "Science relies on the formulation and testing of hypotheses through repeatable experimentation, not on revealed truth about conversations in the Garden of Eden," then what repeatable experiments have confirmed evolution? The truth about evolution is that it is mainly believed because of conversations between atheists, not because of scientific experiments. This makes it faith based at least. Since the US Supreme Court recognizes atheism as a religion, then evolution is really a religious doctrine.


What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the