What is Digg?165 Comments
- dustbowl, on 01/03/2009, -9/+209dugg for nekkid-ness and boobies.
and to think there are religions out there that require females to be covered from head to toe.
the female body needs to be celebrated! just like those body paintings. - Rassa, on 01/03/2009, -7/+176I would say Dugg for art but I would be lying. I dugg it for the boobs.
- DeskFlyer, on 01/03/2009, -5/+90Too bad it's not Emma Watson body art.
- peznex, on 01/03/2009, -2/+82Site is lagging. I hosted them all:
http://i43.tinypic.com/fwrm8w.jpg
http://i39.tinypic.com/2eev2fo.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/j6hhd4.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/neam1i.jpg
http://i39.tinypic.com/210lg0i.jpg
http://i44.tinypic.com/veufpu.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/nb4weh.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/2d80y03.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/16ghp5.jpg - cle2105, on 01/03/2009, -3/+69It's only camel toe if they are wearing pants or a swimsuit, otherwise it's just a vagina
- Aliwalla, on 01/03/2009, -1/+64I am woman, hear me blend into the background
- breakingrocks, on 01/03/2009, -0/+54Dugg for art, boobs and trippiness
- btrues, on 01/03/2009, -0/+35This is getting dugg for no other reason than to get naked girls on the front page
- mKdiR, on 01/03/2009, -0/+33the things i would do to her...
- bdfariello, on 01/03/2009, -0/+31The floral arrangements I would paint on her...
- ronjohnson, on 01/03/2009, -16/+43Is that camel toe?
- z00k, on 01/03/2009, -0/+22Didn't you get the memo?
- tisk, on 01/03/2009, -3/+24oh nooooooooooooooooooo a nipple!
- Newscast, on 01/03/2009, -2/+22Mmm honestly, Body Art should be another way of saying potentially NSFW. I feel like you'd be safe at most jobs though as you're looking at artistic work here and the nudity in the last picture is a small piece of what you're looking at.
- mriojas, on 01/03/2009, -1/+20I kind of agree with him.... I'm not a prude and don't think any of these pictures are really a problem, but others might. That's the whole point behind NSFW: is it safe to be viewing in a public place surrounded by people who might be prudes and take offense? I think the answer here is no. Many (including myself) would consider this art. Some would consider this pornography. Again, I think that considering this porn is simply absurd, but it's better to play it safe while at work, especially with today's sexual harassment laws. Just my 2 cents.
- DouglasQ, on 01/03/2009, -0/+19It's a woman.
The trick is to put your face right near the screen and blur your eyes. - blagga, on 01/03/2009, -1/+20Very nice :)
- mitthuman, on 01/04/2009, -0/+18the dick I would put in her...
- spleeyah, on 01/03/2009, -2/+20What's so NSFW about "Error Establishing Database Connection"?
Is it an unsafe database? MSSQL?! - mcphattySS, on 01/03/2009, -7/+24since when were nipples SFW?
- minkebar, on 01/03/2009, -4/+20Dugg For Emma,
I first meet Emma in the 90's, I was running a restaurant / bar in Rundle St Adelaide, called Boltz Cafe. Emma was a regular customer. She was amazing then and even more so Now.
mal - chaos7, on 01/03/2009, -2/+18*****
dugg - Psythik, on 01/03/2009, -2/+17No you didn't, TinyPic did. You just uploaded them.
- void, on 01/03/2009, -0/+14Need wallpaper sizes
- Bobboq, on 01/03/2009, -0/+13Makes me want to paint.
- samscomputer2, on 01/04/2009, -0/+14the spells i would cast on her...
- DMBmelch, on 01/03/2009, -1/+14OGC
- feliks2, on 01/03/2009, -3/+16head to camel toe*
- CYR1X, on 01/04/2009, -0/+13Celebrated, as in masturbating?
- metaliq, on 01/03/2009, -0/+12Pretty sure Emma Hack painted the girl(s) in the pictures and is not-- unless she shed some weight-- nude for us.
- scb0825, on 01/03/2009, -0/+12And you have an issue with this?
- inactive, on 01/03/2009, -0/+12Dugg for utterly unnatural amounts of patience...On the side of the models as well as the author.
- Nonyaz, on 06/23/2009, -3/+15It would be much more efficient to use a projector for this.
- black27696, on 01/03/2009, -1/+12Yeah fine it's in the description. Valid point by gttca nonetheless.
- DeskFlyer, on 01/03/2009, -2/+13I don't know about you, but I wouldn't click on anything saying 'body art' at work regardless if the description said it was safe for work.
- AyaJulia, on 01/03/2009, -2/+13If you know a woman whose ***** "pokes out" from her inner and outer lips when her legs are firmly together as these models' are, she should donate her body to science. This doesn't happen. I'm inclined to believe you've never seen a real woman naked (porn doesn't count).
- dogfood, on 01/03/2009, -2/+12Wow. It must suck working where you do.
- inactive, on 01/03/2009, -1/+10Check the comments first.
-a guy at work. - gavdana, on 01/03/2009, -0/+9Doesn't matter if he's being a prude or not ... what does matter is how his EMPLOYER feels. Many of are us are spied on by Ironport et. al. and don't want any form of nudity to enrage the HR demons.
- jsauter, on 01/03/2009, -1/+9Just keep telling yourself that it was a *****.
- f1rxf1y, on 01/03/2009, -0/+8very sexy and eloquent. i like it
- Spem, on 01/03/2009, -0/+8Since they were art.
- thaprinze, on 01/03/2009, -0/+8Marge, guess how many boobies I saw! 15!!
- spleeyah, on 01/03/2009, -3/+11OH GAWD!
http://www.emmahackartist.com/images/Emma-pic2.jpg - chaoSStorm, on 01/03/2009, -0/+8Direct link to her collections (nsfw)
http://www.emmahackartist.com/collections.php - scheming, on 01/03/2009, -1/+8http://www.emmahackartist.com
- marioara, on 01/03/2009, -0/+7the cooles camouflage I've seen so far
- RadiatedAnt, on 01/03/2009, -3/+10elephant knuckle from what I can see http://www.emmahackartist.com/images/Emma-pic2.jpg
- inactive, on 01/03/2009, -0/+6i second that
-
Show 51 - 100 of 176 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
