What is Digg?116 Comments
- Pssdoff, on 05/22/2008, -0/+54Someone probably did figure out a method of creating 3D porn. Sadly the man who invented it is now too busy to leave his house and bring the technology to the rest of us.
- dtele, on 05/22/2008, -7/+48They are 'stereo pairs' - not 3D.
- duddy, on 05/22/2008, -1/+28Is there some reason why someone hasn't made a quick porn clip in this manner?
- lucidguru, on 05/22/2008, -2/+26After seeing that girl I could only think one thing.... 3d porn FTW!
- neilcreek, on 05/22/2008, -0/+21Already exists, though not in great volume or great quality. The following links are provided for completeness, and do not necessarily reflect my tastes or professional and artistic opinions :)
NSFW links.
4chanarchive - http://4chanarchive.org/brchive/dspl_thread.php5?t ...
Boris Starosta Stereoscopic Art & 3D Photography - http://www.starosta.com/3dshowcase/inude.html
3Dnudes.com - http://www.nudes3d.com
clickandrelax.com - http://www.clickandrelax.com/priscila_gall_large.h ...
Stereoscopy.com links - http://www.stereoscopy.com/cgi-bin/links/morelinks ...
3D-EROS - http://www.3d-eros.com/gallery-e.html
Flickr 3D glamour photography (private group) - http://flickr.com/groups/3dglamour/
Flickr 3D nude photography (private group) - http://flickr.com/groups/3dnudes/
Feel free to post more if you know of them! - frozenelf, on 05/22/2008, -1/+20It's a schooner!
- scsp85, on 05/22/2008, -2/+19One you get one visible just scroll down for the rest!
- xpliclt777, on 05/22/2008, -0/+12You think that's impressive, check these 3D images out http://www.ranum.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album= ... Warning! NSFW!
- ehsteve23, on 05/22/2008, -0/+10Earthquake!!
- u8eR, on 05/22/2008, -0/+9I've always wonder what a one-armed girl in lingerie would look like in 3D.
- Chalks777, on 05/22/2008, -0/+9From the article's comments: "I don’t come to DPS [Digital Photography School] to see pornography. And I won’t be back again."
This person has not been on The Internet long enough... that hardly counted as pornography. - tito13kfm, on 05/22/2008, -0/+7Holy 1998 Batman!
That website is an atrocity and should be completely forgotten, like the holocaust. - jtrobot, on 05/22/2008, -0/+7A schooner IS a sailboat, stupid-head.
- Bilabrin, on 05/22/2008, -0/+7So THAT'S what they meant when they said it would make you go blind! %)
- neilcreek, on 05/22/2008, -2/+8The technique should not hurt your eyes. If you find that you are experiencing any pain or discomfort, stop immediately and rest your eyes for several hours at least before trying again. Sitting further back from your screen will reduce the amount you need to cross your eyes, and thus decrease the potential for eye strain.
Also make sure you read the warning on the "how-to" page linked from the article. I'll include it here just to be sure:
WARNING: It’s important to state right up front, that there is a small potential risk to your health with this 3D viewing technique. The risk is very small, but I must cover myself. If you have any known problems with your eye muscles, I recommend that you do not attempt this technique. If you experience any light-headedness, headaches or other symptoms, STOP IMMEDIATELY and rest your eyes. Everyone will likely experience some slight eye fatigue when learning this technique, so it is very important to rest your eyes regularly, and only look at 3D images for short periods of time. Even once you have perfected the technique, do not over-exert your eyes. You have been warned. If you attempt to learn this technique, you agree not to hold me responsible for any ill fortune that befalls you as a result. - funk13, on 05/22/2008, -0/+6well that gave me a headache, which does not help a hangover. dugg for kicking me when i'm down.
- matude, on 05/22/2008, -1/+6There are tons of porn images in this manner.
I mean.. rumor has it that there is.. - sexybobo, on 05/22/2008, -1/+6Here is my try at making an animation with the 2 so you don't have to cross your eyes. need to work on it more
- thetipster, on 05/22/2008, -0/+5I find this method way better than the usual stereograms that you have to relax your eyes for.... crossing your eyes is, at least for me, very damn easy.. but trying to move them outwards is really hard. Not to mention those other stereograms suck, seeing 3d shapes in the midst of colored garbage. These are actually full color pictures, I want more!
- Digisphere, on 05/22/2008, -0/+4Found some other really cool cross eye 3d pictures
http://milked.free.fr/crossmodels/index.html
Be sure to check out the bridge
http://milked.free.fr/crossmodels/BBpont_crossed.j ... - mrinsanity, on 05/22/2008, -1/+5I can't do it! ***** THING SUCKS!
- peaceninja, on 05/22/2008, -0/+43D Stereograms (ie Magic Eyes) normally use the 'parallel eye' technique as opposed to the 'cross-eyed' technique. These photographs are all cross-eyed technique (you can tell by trying the parallel eye technique and everything is inversed and inside-out, the back of the room becomes the foreground, etc).
Anyways, I believe it's been illustrated that the parallel eye technique (which requires relaxation of the eyes) can actually help eyesight. And the cross-eyed technique to me strains my eyes. So I just thought I would put this thought out there that whatever movement that this article is speaking of in the photography and video world, that the parallel eye technique should be favored over the cross-eyed technique. And besides, just flipping the two images would then mean that you would use the parallel eye technique over the cross-eyed technique anyways. - inactive, on 05/22/2008, -1/+5it's a sailboat, retard.
- openaddy, on 05/22/2008, -2/+6They're just stereoscopic images.. They've been around since the 1840s. What so crazy about them?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy
There's a company called Loreo that makes a camera attachment for many D/SLRs that will take a left/right image in one photo. This makes taking stereoscopic images a snap (no pun) and allows you to do so with moving subjects. I have one, and it's a lot of fun. - inactive, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3...heheh.. you dumb bastard.
- duggtodeath, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3A digg comment that works. Thanks.
- CYG101, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3I stared too long at the chick and now i cant bring my eyes back to the original position, HELP!
- dtfinch, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3I had no trouble crossing my eyes while retaining clear focus. But afterwards, when I uncrossed, everything was blurry for a couple minutes, and my eyes kept trying to re-cross. It was easier to look at those stereo photos than it is to look at everything else. I feel old now. My vision used to be 20/13, and not 20/10 because I missed one letter on the bottom row, but I haven't been tested in a while.
- Guitarsenal, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3Yeah, it is a little old-school. I've made all kinds of plans to fix it, but have never found the time to actually fix it.
- shortyjacobs, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3How-to is down. Google Cache:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:jedCaB_Z5eEJ: ... - rogueyak, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3Cross-eyed for months
- ikcilabd, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3you know what! there is no easter bunny
Over there, thats just a guy in a suit! - championchap, on 05/22/2008, -0/+3You sir, need to lurk more.
Mighty common on the board. - thesoprano, on 05/22/2008, -1/+4Requesting Rule 34 be in effect for stereoscopic images.
- inactive, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2The key here is not just to have you eyes have the two images go on top of each other. Your face has to be the exact distance away from the screen so that your brain is fooled into believing that it is actually 3d. When you reach that distance (which sometimes doesn't work on bad images), your eyes sort of "lock on" and you can look up and down the picture smoothly, without and difficult effort in crossing your eyes or anything. It really is quite cool
- chandan333, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Its all about clicking from the right Angle.
- Guitarsenal, on 05/22/2008, -1/+3If you liked that, you might like this too:
http://worldsbest3d.com - BryanG412, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Is it a schooner?
- freakk123, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Am I the only one whose mind was blown when they got it to work? Like, seriously, that's some cool *****.
- yeeter, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2For those who are complaining about eye-strain and being unable to see the pictures: The point of the cross-eye view is so that you don't have to have the red/blue glasses or other special equipment to view these pictures in 3D (the software used to put these together can be used to make the red/blue images, aka anaglyphs if that's what you want). If you do the cross-eyed view frequently enough, it becomes easier, and the strain is not so bad. It won't make you blind, it's no worse than holding your finger 4" from your nose and focusing on that.
With that said, I do believe Stereo photography will become more common: With the hackable firmware on the canon cameras, some very clever people have made it possible to sync two separate cameras to take stereo pairs. See Stereo Data Maker: ttp://stereo.jpn.org/eng/sdm/index.htm. - voetsjoeba, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Hey, you're right! I just got it, pretty cool. It's all about finding the right distance from the screen. Once you've got it, you can even scroll down without having to redo it for every image.
- sexybobo, on 05/22/2008, -2/+4http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3538/67957219eq ...
- Steven8890, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2We need a spread eagle shot STAT!
- ElbertF, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2This is the first time I ever bookmarked a Digg comment.
- DemonDomen, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Someone should make a movie
- Iwantawii, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2That's what she said.
- ahawks, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2Why? Why did you have to point out the missing arm? Now its ruined for me :(
- inactive, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2There is stereoscopic porn out there. Great motivation to learn how to keep your eyes crossed, hahaha
- sadisticmind, on 05/22/2008, -0/+2ah cool! its a sail boat!
-
Show 51 - 100 of 116 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
