digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

The 22nd Annual Macworld Editors' Choice Awards

macworld.com — Every year, Macworld reviews hundreds of products, everything from Apple’s newest desktops and laptops to smaller utilities from smaller developers that do things you never thought you needed done. But which ones were the most useful or innovative? Which ones will we still be using a year from now? Which ones were really the best—in terms of both q

Who dugg this? Made popular Dec 12, 2006

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

14 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • miles01110, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8All in all I'd say 2006 was a good year for Apple & co.
  • Millhouse389, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Where's the MacBook Pro?
  • miles01110, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Yeah you could get a Mac Pro for that, but you wouldn't have a monitor.
  • Ninjab3ar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Yes, they are good, but as a workstation? I'd expect to get a Mac Pro in that case.
  • notorious., on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Very true.

    Also, YouTube isn't really a "Mac product", per se. I'm not sure what it's doing on this list.
  • theblueprint, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Agreed. I haven't fallen prey to hardware envy since I got mine.
  • kbarrett, on 10/12/2007, -0/+124-inch iMac Core 2 Duo

    My boss just bought me one of these as a new workstation a few months ago and I have to say that it seriously rocks. You will not believe the display. Amazing.
  • MacParrot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1As much as I like the 24" iMac, for the same cash you can get a Mac Pro low end with two dual core processors, hard drive expansion, as much memory as you can afford, and expansion options that iMacs can only dream about.

    The sweet spot for an iMac 24" would have been around $1699 US.
  • kbarrett, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Those babies aren't cheap either.
  • n00bst3r, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Seems like they made just enough categories so that every product Apple released this year would win something.
  • rickcarson, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1For $2121 you can get a Mac Pro with a single 160GB hard drive and the slowest CPUs they've got. Without some kind of magic discount, they're not getting cheaper than that. And in any case, if you had the magic discount, then you could apply it to the iMac as well.

    So I wouldn't call it the same cash.

  • kbarrett, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Hmm...

    I'm a designer and so far the iMac is working out pretty well for me. But I wouldn't exactly say 'no' to a Mac Pro either.

    My iMac is nice and compact. I like the wireless keyboard and might mouse (and I love that scroll thingy). It's keeps my workspace pretty and uncluttered.
  • MuffinOfDoom, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Mmm...apples.
  • ferrarif1, on 10/12/2007, -7/+2I agree. I hope 2007 kicks off with an IPHONE :D

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...

© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.