4 Comments
- nstanosheck, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3It all depends on what you want to do. You can still run Classic and Mac OS X in Linux via Mac-on-Linux and Linux makes older Macs pop like they have not done in years. Not everyone can afford the latest and greatest Macs.
Also, some people just prefer open-source OSes and software to proprietary closed source OSes and software. All a matter of taste, I guess. - digggggggggg, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2After 5 years or so of using Linux as my desktop OS, I switched to a Mac and haven't looked back. Although I wholeheartedly think that Linux is awesome for a lot of situations, even now, it's just not ready for the desktop.
For example, I was so accustomed to editing files in /etc/, changing around the ld path configuartion, and finding dependencies on top of dependencies just for getting a binary package to work, that it just seemed natural. Oftentimes, the binary would not work, and I had to resort to editing source code just to get a damn program to compile. Apple's OSX just works. Although most of it isn't open source, and it's not nearly as flexable as Linux, I like having the ability to download a DMG, drag the program to "applications," and expect it to work without having to do anything time consuming. Having the entire program under a single icon is unbelivably convinent. Just try to uninstall an app in Linux. Without a package manager, you'll have to weed out individual libraries and resources from obscure branches of /usr/lib/ , /usr/share/ , etc.
All of us have our reasons for switching from Mac to Linux. My question is: why? - ve7jtb, on 10/12/2007, -1/+04 year old story.


What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official