digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

HOWTO: Mac OS X86 & Windows XP Dual Boot

osx86.classicbeta.com — This simple howto shows any user how to easily create a dual boot system between Mac OS X86, and Windows XP.

Who dugg this? Made popular Aug 5, 2005

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

12 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • gorkon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Whoever is violating their NDA as a developer will likely not EVER be able to be listed as a developer by Apple ever again.
  • WorfoSAUR, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0oh..I thought that it this was to put OSX on any PC. Any chance that it'll work on AMD chips too?
  • jonsimmons, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0That's what I thought. The wording's identical. Ironically, it was taken down because it DID violate the NDA. Whoops :-)...
  • MikeZila, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Got through.

    This is just the guide that was posted a while ago about getting WinXP and Linux on one of the developer machines, not on a generic x86.
  • inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0most know this but just in case for any page that won't load paste url in yahoo search and click Cached.
  • aksim, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Dual boot howto with Vista would be cooler.. anyone seen reports of Windows Vista Beta1 been installed on Apple's x86 developer machines? ;-)
  • chosenone-, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Wow, let me clean the dust off my dev machine and try this... *yawn*

    Can't blame them for trying to bring something to the table...
  • staulkor, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0ive been wondering this for a while, would the new OSX86 work on AMD? Its almost the same as an intel...
  • atf487, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0next time, atleast put 'for dev machines only' in the description.

    i got sort of interested there for a second.
  • ProAm500, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0No screenshots at least....
  • dclowd9901, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0How does this apply to anyone but developers. And if that's the case, what the hell relevance does it have to digg.com?
  • MikeZila, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I'm sure it would be an interesting read, but the site seems to be under the digg effect.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...

© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.