What is Digg?93 Comments
- bitterg, on 10/12/2007, -7/+106Did anyone need any more proof that Gartner has its head up its a**?
- Quix, on 10/12/2007, -3/+62Alternate headline: "Why Market Analysts Don't Lead Multi-Billion-Dollar Technology Companies."
- swoopdog, on 10/12/2007, -13/+59I think microsoft should stop making operating systems
- clutchperformer, on 10/12/2007, -7/+41How does one get a job at Gartner? Is it like other "analyst" and "consulting" firms in that I have to graduate from an ivy league school with an exaggerated sense of importance and a degree in political science?
- sfslim, on 10/12/2007, -4/+33There's an excellent deconstruction of exactly how stupid this recommendation is over on Daring Fireball, John Gruber's excellent Mac tech and opinion site.
http://daringfireball.net/2006/10/gartner_jackasses
Unable to conceive of any /worse/ advice that anyone could possibly offer Apple at this juncture, John emphatically bestows his "Jackass of the Week" award on the both of them. - xtr3m, on 10/12/2007, -4/+28Gartner is not a guy.
- thatsiebguy, on 10/12/2007, -3/+21Here, I will try to act like a Market Analyst: "Ferrari should stop selling cars. They should instead, sell the experience of driving.." Yep, sounds just as BS.
- galore, on 10/12/2007, -2/+19Please. Gartner exists to provide some (expensive) foundation for internal pitches to upper management. In rude terms they are a ***** factory.
- SgtBeavis, on 10/12/2007, -0/+15FWIW, IMO Apple doesn't sell Macs based on how good OSX is. The iPod is a pretty good music player from a software (or firmware if you prefer) but that's not why people buy it. People buy it because the hardware is so dang cool and works great. I submit to you that there are better MP3 players on the market that support a much wider variety of music formats. They have better software but Apple has better hardware (or design if you prefer).
IMO hardware is what gets people to look at Macs. They see it and go, oh gee that looks pretty sweet. I think I'll give it a roll. Then they try OSX and they go "holy crap this thing actually friggin ROCKS."
Apple, as many have noted, is a damn good software company. But its the hardware that gets people in the door. Its what got me. OSX is just the icing on the cake....
......ok, its the icing, chocolate syrup, cherrys, sprinkles, and a side of homemade icecream. - dimitrisokolov, on 10/12/2007, -9/+23
No, you have all the proof you need. Gartner Group are idiots. Dell? Dell makes crappy computers and has crappy support.
Apple is on the right track and most everything they do is outsourced to manufacturing in Taiwan or China anyway. Apple is all about design.
What is Dell? Zero design, slap crap together and sell it cheap. They don't produce one item that is cool or sought after. No one attends a DellWorld event do they? - jeff25624, on 10/12/2007, -3/+14I just don't understand how any one could rationally come to that conclusion. I mean seriously, Apple is doing better than ever, is poised to reach even greater heights, and these guys suggest they stop selling computers? I just don't see the logic behind it.
- Swift2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9I must tell y'all something. The MBA degree sucks, and it distorts your judgment. The US was built into the economic powerhouse it became in the 20th century without a single MBA running anything. Most people didn't have a high school degree. Most businessmen were engineers or just that vague thing called "entrepreneurs." And in the era of the MBA, we're losing ground. The MBA degree is a way of commodifying your brain. Supposedly, according to these dorks, you can run a great car company or a cruddy payday loan company in the same way. The answer? No, you can't. Use your actual human brain, not Excel plus a bunch of friggin' business-school buzzwords. The MBA mentality is screwing us up. The people who have it think they're just being objective, but they're really just being corporatist political flacks.
Steve Jobs loves making computers, many of which are very cool. When he was away from the company, it slowly started to suck. The visionary, sans MBA, returned, and immediately they began cooking again. They've now grown from something hard to measure to 6% of the market. And some pencil-neck peabrain from Gartner counts the cheese and thinks the whole world is a dumb as him.
I don't mind them existing, but who hires these morons for consultants?
Next: somebody from Gartner recommends outsourcing the Applecare help line to a bunch of lemurs in Madagascar. Sure, they can't speak, but they work cheap! - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+12Apple to Gartner: suck it.
- DaffyDuck, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7The corollary to Gartner's advice is that Microsoft should quit selling Windows and focus on selling keyboards and mice.
- CdnPhoto, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9Apple to Gartner: Stop making stupid analysis's
- SuperSunny, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8I just wanted to say, that I just bought a MacBook. For those who are saying Apple should focus on the OS a little bit more, er...you guys should start to do some research. Personally, the OS feels like I'm in the future. Don't you mean they should backtrack? It's breathtaking, simple, easy, and cool looking. What's wrong?
- eviltoaster2go, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Apple will most likely NEVER AGAIN License Mac OS.
Way back in time Apple Licensed Mac System 7 and it was a disaster: mac clones from companies like Power Computing siphoned off money from Apple, profits sank, and the overall mac experience took a huge hit. Apple had to call the next operating system Mac OS 8 just to break off those contracts and start fresh.
Apple wants to control the overall experience people have with their computers: software and hardware combined. Licensing the OS ruins that. - one1plus1one, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5s@Swift2
You are definately on to something there Swift2. Our company hired an MBA consultant at $150,000 per year, who spent 1 year practically dismantling our company, and turned our IT department upside down, and decreased our search-engine rankings.
Every idea that we had was overanalyzed by him, and made 100 times more complex to implement then it had to be.
When he was fired, our IT Network Administrator (who only has a high school degree, and a couple of networking courses) simply stepped in, and acted. He did things without convening an endless series of meetings and analysis. He listened to our ideas and implemented them and experimented. Some of them worked. Some of them didn't.
In the end he put our IT department back together, and increased our search engine ranking to 2nd place (by experimenting with adsense for a couple of months) and increased our profits by about 40 percent.
What does that tell you about MBA consultants? (After 1 year of hell with them our company will NEVER again hire a self important MBA graduate again.)
This company... Gartner, seems to be alot of those MBA types all congregated together. - DaffyDuck, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Well, the case on my MacBook Pro is all aluminum and the keys are backlit and the touch pad is large enough to actually be useful. It's really a good piece of hardware.
- Harlequn, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Pontiac just wrote an oped stating that Ferrari should get out of the car business.
- origclubsoda, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Apple is a hardware company. Always has been. If they stop selling computers and iPods then what will they sell?
- clutchperformer, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Okay, I'm going to make a truly biased, biggoted and scientifically unproven statement. And you guys are welcome and justified in taking me to task for it.
Based on personal experience and second-hand anecdotes, I have found few redeeming qualities in 97% of the MBAs I've met/known/worked with or heard about.
When I am hiring, an MBA is always kicked out of my candidate pool. But this is against my principles so I always end up digging their resumes out of the trash and interviewing them anyway. And I am always shocked by their swiss cheese knowledge: impressive at case study citation but cannot locate Luxembourg on the map. Completely competent at how to dodge labor laws but unaware that Iranians are Persians that speak Farsi. In short, very two-dimensional people lacking passion for anything more than personal gain.
And the only thing I've found worse than an MBA is a Californian MBA. It's as if the state accreditation board in CA requires 20 credit hours of "My $hit Don't Stink" classes.
My career, enterprises and fortunes improved by 80% when I instituted a personal rule of avoiding MBAs.
The best workers and leaders I've found are motivated autodidactics, college grads who graduated with enough wisdom to embrace humility, and high-school educated ex-military. Give me those anytime over an MBA. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+8Probably started off as a single guy though, who's company was bought/wrested away and then used for evil.
- nonameguy, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5totorototoro is right.
The power of the Mac is in it's integration of hw and sw. How else were they able to migrate from the 68k to the PPC and now to Intel so nimbly.
Apple doesn't design hardware or software...it designs *Systems*. - vagarach, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Poor analysis by the analyst. Apple being a software company is quite a laugh. OSX is good, but not good enough to support the company. Notice though, how nicely a licensing model works on paper. Apple sells a whole lot of computers all with OSX on them, ignoring the fact that people are paying money for the computer hardware *and* for the usability of the OS and its programs. So if all they did was license OSX, someone else would do all the difficult and expensive stuff like designing hardware for them! Then it's mostly profit from millions of copies on computers that Dell is selling *for* Apple! Genius!
How absurd. They should cut the guy's salary and pay him $2000 a year for this rubbish, since he clearly shouldn't be earning 100 times that. - totorototoro, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5With Apple, its not just the hardware, and its not just the software. Its how well the software is integrated with the hardware, and how tightly controlled both environments are. And not just for OS X. One reason the BootCamp beta works so well is that Apple has total control of the internal hardware configuration of the machines it is running on, which makes setting Windows up much simpler, and easier to troubleshoot. The iPod environment is similar-total control of the hardware, the software that runs on it, and the software on the computer that interfaces with it.
Giving up any of these advantages would be foolish for Apple; I'm surprised a tech. analyst can't see this. - cquinnd, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3 willcode4beer,
Gartner get paid for these "opinions", and have a worse record of ideas that flop than they have of actually predicting market trends that would turn out to be beneficial for companies or consumers. - tuxuser, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3i think this guy is a bit TOO pc minded.
- KibibyteBrain, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3"developer-friendliness --- they run a closed-design model"
Are you insane? Darwin is OSS and Unix is very well understood. I was able to write for OSX without any extra knowledge coming from a Linux background. - nandabanaotakun, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Closed design? *Downloads nightly Webkit*
- jamief, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3'Cuz being the #2 OS on Dell machines went so well for Be and Red Hat.
Next Gartner pearl-o-wisdom: Apple should stop wasting time and money making iPods and concentrate on the iTunes store.
I'm not gonna register to RTFA, can somebody tell me if the word "beleaguered" appears in it anywhere? :) - DSPGeek, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Gartner is a good example of why analysts should be soundly ignored. If y'all remember the NASDAQ debacle of 2000, most analysts rated crap stocks like Exodus and Worldcom screaming buys, while over on the buy side the I-Banks were dumping those shares as quickly as they could.
- GoYe, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Maybe Gartner should get out of the analyst business.
- iainc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2For the love of God, I wish Dell would stop making computers because they're not very good at it. Oh, and maybe Gartner should keep to the statistics and stop giving advice - they're not much good at that.
- iainc, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1analyses, mate. But I dig your point of view :-) Gartner are talking out of their collective ass.
- SteveDeGroof, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Interesting thought. I suppose Apple could license the hardware to third-party manufacturers and just sell the OS. I could've sworn they started to do that in the 90s and then backed out.
- Comatose51, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Hit it right on the nail. The business consultants I know are pretty much what you've just described. Don't forget, Enron was McKinsey's biggest customer until it collapsed. So much for their flaunted Ivy Leaguee intelligence.
- iainc, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1But Dell would still make 2nd-rate rubbish and eat into Apple's well-deserved hardware profits.
- raynevandunem, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The report's URL, although it requires registration.
http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_search&id=497146&subref=simplesearch - xutopia, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I look at my work place. We have 20 machines with half of them using linux. 10 are programmers and they all would (and want) to switch to OS X but cannot because purchasing a new computer is out of the question at this point. However paying 500$ per seat to switch to OS X would be reasonable and if Apple would sell their OS for less than that I'm sure lots of people would be buying it.
- stuartjmoore, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4the better grade plastic alone is reason enough
- hitkaiser, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1To those saying that Gartner doesn't know what its talking about...
Many large companies pay thousands of dollars to recieve their advice and reports, the truth is that many companies to listen carefully to what they have to say, not necesarily follow everything they say (that would be wreckless).
If enough people are convinced something should be done, no matter the merit of the action, it puts a lot of pressure carry that out - aristotle0dude, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1"by willcode4beer on 10/21/06
KibibyteBrain, then why don't they release preview versions of the OS before the OS release?
Even MS does that, it means developers can have new software ready the same day the OS is officially released."
Excuse me? Apple does release preview versions of the OS if you attend the WWDC regardless of who you are. If your software is not a device drivers or haxie, it should run fine in 10.5 just like it ran in 10.3 and 10.4. Granted, your program will not be able to take advantage of all of the latest features but it should work if you wrote it against public APIs. Apple seeds builds of the upcoming OS to registered paid developers.
MSFT also releases special builds only for registered Select partners and MSDN subscribers like Apple does. I think you are confusing MSFT's habit of using the general public as free beta testers with builds that they send out only to registered developers.
Apple used to seed to all paid developers through out the process until some people started releasing the builds onto bit torrent sites. Those pirates ruined it for some paid developers. - bradbaxter, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Gartner was great in the 80's, but started to slip in the 90's. Nowadays, just laughable.
Actually, I have no idea who or what Gartner is. - quickjack, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3Zune Gartner!
- d00d, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You are such a ***** moron. How does letting Dell build OS X machines instantly add marketshare?
Please note: People buys Dells because they have Windows on them, not just because it's Dell. - trancelgic, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1My opinion of Gartners' opinion is Gartner is in bed with Dell. Things that make you go 'hmmmmm'.
- iainc, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1> Next: somebody from Gartner recommends outsourcing the Applecare
> help line to a bunch of lemurs in Madagascar. Sure, they can't
> speak, but they work cheap!
LOL! Or, worse still, Cap Gemini or Accenture. - eggyacid, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I guess Gartner is in Dell's pocket.
maybe dell should stop selling hardware and just focus on re-license OEM version of XP - uppedbyhiggins, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You can not beat the service at Apple--it's like a mother's unconditional love (as long as the warranty/AppleCare is still valid...maybe 'unconditional' isn't the right word, but you get what I mean).
-
Show 51 - 90 of 90 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is