What is Digg?69 Comments
- Ascendant, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11There's been a rumor that the iPhone is coming out "next quarter" for the past, what, eight quarters?
Ditto for the "real" "touchscreen" video iPod. - Herolint, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10If "everyone" is always asking, then perhaps Apple should consider doing a cell phone. It seems the market is already there.
- thenamestj, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9I agree that it'll probably won't come out. I'm sure deep inside of Apple HQ that there's a phone prototype that will never see the light of day.
- bbatsell, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MVNO
- heavensblade23, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9The same argument he makes about veto power, etc applied to the music industry and the iTMS.
- jpf., on 10/12/2007, -0/+8At this point I'm wondering if this is a Chicken/Egg thing. Which came first? The rumor or the product idea?
- Walker2323, on 10/12/2007, -6/+12You can hear the hearts of a million Apple fanboy's hearts breaking.
- zetsurin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6I am willing to believe this guy. I have no faith. I am iPhone atheist unless I actually meet iPhone ;)
- Oakenshield, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Because he knows. No, really.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6What? I think YOU are the only one who thinks that cell phones will diminish any time soon.
Let's see...being able to call anyone anywhere you are, or having to look for a WiFi hotspot to make a call. Right. Cell phones are ging to die soon . That's it. - YoungBrews, on 10/12/2007, -3/+8When it comes out, I'll call you from my flying car!
- Artifez, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6Hell, it's all rumor but it seems to be coming Q1 2007.
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/cingular-exclusive-on-apple-iphone-203248.php - mywhitenoise, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5i'm sure it will come out, didn't they just sign a 6 month contract with Cingular?
- hurfydurfur, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I guess the biggest reason everyone keeps saying "Apple needs to make an iPhone" is because they don't have one, right? Like the Microsoft PC? Or the Dell OS?
- yeahbuddy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5One man's opinion. Meh. It'll be here before we know it.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Has anyone given any thought to the fact that if Apple came out with a phne that played music as well as the iPod that the demand for iPods would plummet?
SEVERAL polls have shown that most people really just want the ability to play music on their iPods. Video is noce, but not a huge priority to all but a small minority. And most people are also not all that concerned with having 60 Gig or so. That is why the Nano is so popular.
So, think about it. If you can get a phone that pretty much does everything the Nano does, why would you want to carry around a second device?
Apple is not going to cannibalize their money maker any time soon. Unless the iPod sales start to drop, it will not happen. So...if you want an iPhone, root for the Zune. - monkeyrun, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I do agree there might never be an iPhone.
BUT this is Steve Jobs and Apple we are talking about here. They are not exactly the kind of people who really give a crap about what other people think. They'll sell something they think is good enough, other people's (aka phone carriers) opinion won't really bother them at all. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Another thing to think about. A big reason why the iPod hit it so big is that when they came out, there was not really much in the way of real competition. Yes, they were not he first by any means, but the competition was not as great as it is with cell phones. That was a HUGE advantage for Apple.
And that is an advantage that Apple would not have in the cell phone business. People already have a cell phone that they like. They are not going to junk their current 6 month old phone just to get one made by Apple.
And I hate to break it to the fanboys, but without that advantage, Apple really hasn't done much with any other product. - monkeyrun, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Phone carriers really do not have the final say on which phone apple could sell.
Apple has the distribution network for their own products. - geminitojanus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Considering Apple's continued iPod success will require some kind of "Purchase-on-the-Go" system for the iPod, and the ability to import songs purchased from your iPod into iTunes, it's a virtual certainty that it's coming, it's just a matter of when they get everything legally worked out. Quite frankly, this last release of the iPod solved the last problem: how to search for a song on iTunes Music Store via the iPod interface. (And becoming an MVNO just for your Mobile iTunes Store service would make a lot more sense than becoming an MVNO to sell your cool trick gadget phone, as they're not all that profitable).
However, an iPhone would require a lot more engineering than that, and it wouldn't make sense to be an MVNO if you wanted to distribute an iPhone (because as an MVNO, you'd be limiting your phone service to people who buy your coverage, instead of letting your customers pick whatever network they want to use), which gives credence to the Cingular-exclusive iPhone being released Q107 rumors that are flying around now. - dp9ny, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2wasn't the razr $499 w/ contract at release
- zbeast, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Whats the point of having an iPhone?
There's would simply be not enough margin in the pricing structure to support it.
Cell Phone company's make all there money in selling you cheap phones and over priced phone service.
Apple makes it money on selling you over prices mp3 players and cheap music.
Your iPhone would cost you $600 to $700 dollars for apples to hit there normal 80% margins. - jonj, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3apple doesn't have the RF engineering experience to execute a phone that will be able to compete in the big leagues. the only "iPhone" would be a device created by Moto, LG, Samsung, or one of the others who actually knows how to make a phone. Hint - it's not that simple!
- dp9ny, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3I would!
- pcharles23, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:IRYi2g_9LlIJ:the.taoofmac.com/space/iPhone+the.taoofmac.com/space/iPhone&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=safari
Cache of the link on that blog...
"the taoofmac com space iphone" - finite, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The Nokia 770 already makes a good wifi phone today, and also works well as network music and video player, with 800x600 at 225dpi. And unlike the Zune, it doesn't infect my files with that wacky 3-day 3-play DRM.
***** the Zune, and the iPod, and the iPhone. Cheap wifi-enabled pocket hard drives can't be that far off (zune doesn't count, until it is hacked to run a real OS). - monkeyrun, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1why not. people are paying $400-$600 for a decent smartphone
- jonj, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@galore:
ah, credential flashing, it is? i work for motorola. and while a GSM or UMTS chipset is a swappable thing, integrating phone capabilities into the device isn't a trivial matter.
you are right, though; apple is uniquely posiitioned with their experience of hardware and software engineering, to be able to put such a device together. they're far more experienced than a company like, say, microsoft, who relies on 3rd parties for a lot of their hardware design (look at the zune!). i just think that you're underestimating the "soft touch" of the operating system design that goes into a phone. putting a chipset into an ipod is easy. but redesigning their iPod operating system to handle all of the normal functions of a phone in addition to its normal music functions? that's the hard part. - jonj, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2ha... uh, nothing is ever as simple as "slapping a GSM or UMTS chipset" in there. and it certainly wouldn't cost a mere "couple of dollars" per unit.
- MikeCerm, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Finally, some sanity! The cellular market in America is like a minefield of red-tape. I just don't think that Apple is interested in getting into it.
If they wanted to do it "right", they'd have to become a MVNO, and I really doubt that they'd be able to make enough phone selling hardware (phones) to make it worth their while. Apple and their shareholders don't like being in low-margin businesses, and that's what the cellular market would be for them. - Daveecee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1But... Patents!
- galore, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3That article assumes that Apple can only sell via network operators and their contract-supported business plan that hides the true cost of a cell phone.
Not true.
Apple already has the manufacturing for the iPod sorted out. They have tons of SW engineers. And it costs only a few dollars to add a GSM or UMTS chipset to their iPods.
After some RnD expense on a UI for a cell phone and after slapping a GSM or UMTS chipset into their iPods, field tests and RF certifications, they have their iPhone which costs them maybe $10 more to produce than a Nano.
Then Apple can advertise it that you can just pop your T-mobile or Cingular SIM into your iPhone and voila you have an Apple cell phone that Apple sold you for the price of an iPod + a few bucks without having to suck up to any carrier. - dp9ny, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Thats the bottom line
- aristobrat, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1If RIM can keep pumping model after model of new BlackBerrys out and not have the carriers veto anything (core feature wise), I don't think Apple would have any problems getting the carriers to leave the phone alone.
- pkulak, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Apple isn't LG. If Apple puts out a phone, the carriers will fall all over themselves to carry it and probably won't even dare try to "veto" something.
- Kazrog, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1We all know that Apple is all about pushing the envelope. Cell phones are so 1990.
- finite, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@lakawak, Actually if you read the Zune Insiders blog where that detail first originated, and where it was also supposedly corrected, you will see that Zune actually DOES apply the 'built-in limitations' to previously un-limited files. http://www.zuneinsider.com/2006/09/zune_and_drm_or.html
Microsoft's PR tool is attempting to deceptively imply that applying 'built in limitations' is somehow different from 'applying DRM': (direct MS quote here) "Zune to Zune Sharing won't apply any DRM to that song. The 3-day/3-play limitation is built into the device, and it only applies on the Zune device"
What a load of *****. Who do they think they're fooling? (sadly, they're actually fooling many people, take digg user lakawak for instance...) - Kazrog, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1My prediction: Apple is going to come out with a VoIP phone. Please don't mod me down just because you disagree. I will laugh at you all when it happens. :P
http://www.kazrog.com/2006/09/why-apple-wont-make-cell-phone.html - TexMachina, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Very shortsighted if true. I have 2GB on my phone for MP3's and there will be more space in the future as memory cards increase. Writing.. meet wall.
- Scott2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Ah, I can always count on David Pogue to have some sense . . .
- galore, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I am aware how difficult it is to integrate a high level OS like Symbian/S60 or Linux/QT and all the effort that goes into a production quality phone, especially if you want accelerated multimedia and you use the baseport and multimedia code of a chipset manufacturer. My "slapping on" use of language referred to the phone call capability - there is no RnD to speak of necessary on Apple's part.
But I guess that Apple should be able to handle the SW part easily - esp. if they use their own OS, given that they have a super strong SW background. And per production unit, I am sure adding cell phone circuits + cost of RnD is < $10 - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1That is not the point. The point is that they are not just competing with just MP3 phones. They are competing with ALL cell phones. The market is just not big enough for MP3 cell phones, especially when you consider the fact that pretty much every single iPhone sold will mean one less iPod sold. Even obtaining a similar market share of the MP3 cell phone market will not be reason enough to do this.
- DelMonte, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11. When asked about the iPhone at their last financial results conference, Apple officially stated that "they're not sitting around doing nothing (about it)". So that was an admission that they are working on a phone.
2. There are clear indications found in the first gen iPod nano Firmware (1.2) showing that Apple at least experimented with a cellphone UI on iPods.
Pogue is a nice and funny guy, but he's looking for hits on this one. - t3hX, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Hey, I'm a Mac user and I have a Palm TX that I tend to use as a MP3 player. What's wrong with the treo? It exists, the iPhone doesn't (yet). So why would anyone be digging you down. Maybe if it was a Windows Mobile treo?
- zigziggityzoo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1(now the ears of my ears awake and now the eyes of my eyes are opened) -ee cummings.
and the hearts of their hearts are broken. (seriously, say hearts again...) - alexeykazansky, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I will not buy iPod if I have a useful phone that can play music as iPod does, and I guess, we will have that kind of phone in a year or two, whatever Apple makes it or not. If they don't do that, they'll just loose the market share.
- monergism, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Good. I mean it's bad enough watching people drive with a cell phone. Now they want to be able to put it to their ear and listen to it? That's crazy talk.
- galore, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1@jonj:
"ha... uh, nothing is ever as simple as "slapping a GSM or UMTS chipset" in there. and it certainly wouldn't cost a mere "couple of dollars" per unit."
Well, I happen to work at a major manufacturer of GSM and UMTS chipsets and help cell phone OEMs with their firmware integration and know how much those chipsets are. What are your credentials to back up your sarcastic snark? - wphj, on 10/12/2007, -5/+5Not only is it a rumor, it's not far fetched at all.
Music Playing phones suck now, but they won't in a few years. Inevitably, someone will come out with something cool enough to get people to use it instead of a separate iPod. I'd love to be able to just carry one device around, but nothing is good enough now.
It'd be stupid of Apple not to try to be that "someone" - cutebanana, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0why should Apple make an iPhone ? Unless someone manage to automatically create a service that allows the ringer to automatically send mp3s over call tones...
-
Show 51 - 69 of 69 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is