What is Digg?317 Comments
- MuckSavage76, on 03/18/2008, -8/+96Then you are doing something wrong. Works just fine right here to digg you down.
- iRoy, on 03/18/2008, -16/+89I've made the switch from Firefox back to Safari since Safari 3 came out and it's pretty well worth it. It really is a lot faster.
- fungifred, on 03/18/2008, -4/+59I think webkit nightlys are up to 93 on Acid3
- MuckSavage76, on 03/18/2008, -3/+54Wow. Seriously? 18 megs? Is that breaking your 60 meg drive?
- inactive, on 03/18/2008, -10/+61Now when is it coming to the iPod Touch and the iPhone?
- inactive, on 03/18/2008, -4/+47Its a unknown fact that FF *isn't* the best web browser in some respects.
- postalblowfish7, on 03/18/2008, -2/+43http://safariadblock.sourceforge.net/
- badqat, on 03/18/2008, -5/+42Why is that? Works fine for me.
- diothar, on 03/18/2008, -4/+40So, take your mouse cursor, place it on "digg it" then click your mouse button. Seems to work for everybody else. Irony has nothing to do with it. Seems as if you just don't know how to digg. I hope I've assisted you today.
- freshyill, on 03/18/2008, -1/+34Just a heads up for those of you who are interested. You can always keep up with the type of changes that are included with this version of Safari by downloading the Webkit nightly builds at http://webkit.org. It's very useful if you want to see what sort of changes Apple will incorporate into Safari's rendering engine, and if you're designing something and you want to test out the latest and greatest techniques.
- tacojohn, on 03/18/2008, -1/+34It's by far the least bloated web browser- it barely has a UI for the user...
- AQUaDeX, on 03/18/2008, -2/+32Well at least it's the only released (stable) browser that gets 75/100 on ACID3... http://acid3.acidtests.org/
- wzpgsr, on 03/18/2008, -3/+32"Unleashes"? Does this mean Safari is going to crap on my lawn?
- SSUK, on 03/18/2008, -0/+28IE7: 14/100 (page is completely garbled, however)
IE8 Beta 1 17/100 (close to reference)
Firefox 2.0.0.10: 53/100 (Not displayed in proper format at all)
Firefox 3 Beta 1: 58/100 (Like refrence, without colour)
Firefox 3 Beta 4: 68/100 (Like refrence, without colour)
Safari 3.1 (WIN32): 74/100 (Like reference, without colour)
Opera 9.25: 46/100 (Worse than Firefox 2.x in presentation)
My own personal findings from the browsers I have installed, to curve idiotic replies to this comment. - sonicularulus, on 03/18/2008, -3/+30"Apple UNLEASHES version 3.1"
the update sounds like a weapon... - InorganicMatter, on 03/18/2008, -3/+26I just did...
- InorganicMatter, on 03/18/2008, -0/+23It's an 18MB download. It consumed 134MB of disk space when it installed. :p
- supermanred, on 03/18/2008, -1/+22The CSS Web Font is a standard that will hopefully be adopted by most major browsers, its about time I saw something other than ***** helvetica and verdana! BTW, also the fastest major browser.
- Numfar28, on 03/18/2008, -1/+20Actually they've submitted it to the W3C to become a standard. Right now they're following the appropriate procedures using the -webkit- prefix, just like what mozilla does with its -moz- prefix.
- madmac625, on 03/18/2008, -4/+22If you knew you were going to get dugg down, would you still comment?
- UKsHaDoW, on 03/18/2008, -1/+19You have to wait for them to load, then they play normal speed. ;)
- MrViklund, on 03/18/2008, -6/+2375/100 in the new ACID 3 test. Amazing. http://acid3.acidtests.org/
- sark666, on 03/18/2008, -1/+17I don't even use safari, but I'm most excited to hear about a standard for video. The quicker we can get rid of flash for video, the better. But with firefox 3 almost out, I've heard no word on support for this, so until firefox 4?!
- Numfar28, on 03/18/2008, -0/+16Actually this is part of the CSS specification and support is required to pass Acid3. Why would you have a problem with it?
- Numfar28, on 03/18/2008, -2/+18Here are some nifty demos for the new video element supported by Safari 3.1 (scroll to bottom) :
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/a-call-for-vide ...
Note how these are .ogg files, by the way. I'm sure that should make a lot of people happy. - sourc3, on 03/18/2008, -0/+16It already is. I downloaded it this morning through ASU.
- hypercrypt, on 03/18/2008, -3/+18"run on _any_ Intel-based Mac or a Mac with a PowerPC G5, G4 or G3 processor and built-in FireWire"
STFU - supermanred, on 03/18/2008, -1/+16I just tested the latest build of Safari (Webkit) and it scores 93. If I had the balls to run IE I bet it scores lower and firefox is somewhere in between. I however do not have the balls to run IE at work. It could cause the collapse of our business, and I'd be out of a job.
- gfxl, on 03/18/2008, -3/+18I find Safari faster. But I'm sure many would beg to differ.
- esbi, on 03/18/2008, -0/+14It's included in Firmware 1.2 (or at least in Aspen Simulator it is)
[ AppleWebKit/525.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1 Mobile/5A147p Safari/5525.7 ] - skidooer, on 03/18/2008, -1/+15The whole idea behind CSS is that it degrades gracefully. Who cares if it looks like crap in other browsers as long as they can still access the content?
- Barrie, on 03/18/2008, -0/+14How could a web browser possibly break a web server?? If that is true you would be able to crash any website that is running the same version of Apache as you...
- postalblowfish7, on 03/18/2008, -0/+13not on a mac.
- postalblowfish7, on 03/18/2008, -4/+17i agree that it's ***** that tech as ancient as animated gifs is still broken in safari. i guess no one at apple frequents ytmnd...
- antipoet, on 03/18/2008, -15/+28This is ridiculous. The digg synopsis above says nearly as much as the actual article.
- UKsHaDoW, on 03/18/2008, -1/+14Safari feels much better on mac than firefox tbh.
Its more integrated, uses webkit(Which currently better then gecko. They don't like using gecko on small devices since its so resource intensive)
The downer is the lack of plug ins - jtdgrz, on 03/18/2008, -1/+13...93
http://webkit.org/blog/161/webkit-hits-93100-in-ac ... - kenthorvath, on 03/18/2008, -2/+14Any word on whether this breaks PithHelmet compatibility?
- MrViklund, on 03/18/2008, -2/+14That's ok. But I think most people don't care that you don't care. So why post.
- smoger, on 03/18/2008, -10/+22It also supports CSS Web Fonts, giving designers limitless choices of fonts to create stunning new web sites.. that work in the one major browser with the smallest user base.
- alex7575, on 03/18/2008, -0/+11I had the balls, and IE 7 froze my computer for about a minute and died a agonizing death (just crashed), I had it run under VMWare 1.1.1, don't know if that had anything to do with it.
- ilgaz, on 03/18/2008, -3/+14You can update to beta version of 1passwd (enable beta updates in software update) or you can wait for Safari 3.1 final version supporting stable release in matter of hours.
- bigsteve, on 03/18/2008, -0/+11Or a puppy.
- MacSuxWindozSux, on 03/18/2008, -2/+13100/100 But I had to draw and color it all in on a sheet of blank paper.
- iRoy, on 03/18/2008, -5/+16I forgot to mention stability. That factors into my decision to use Safari 3.
I'll look into the beta though. Firefox 2 sucks on OS X, I was using BonEcho for a while but even that was unstable. - UKsHaDoW, on 03/18/2008, -0/+11I actually like the way they stop you customizing, on Linux i keep playing with it, and waste hours upon hours trying to get it perfect ^_^
- TomKarpik, on 03/18/2008, -1/+12And Firefox 2 is 17 MB.
Unfortunately, RAM usage of the two is a completely different story. - MrViklund, on 03/18/2008, -0/+10nightly...
- lepton, on 03/18/2008, -0/+10I had a similar problem, perhaps you were previously using a developer beta as I was. Go to Preferences, Security, Show Cookies, scroll down and remove all the digg cookies and you'll be fine with no data loss.
- MrViklund, on 03/18/2008, -6/+16Stop whining.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 317 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is