The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.
Why McCain is worse than Obama, Part 2
worldnetdaily.com — Joe Farah asks people to tell him where he's wrong. All right, I'll tell. Fairness Doctrine, that's how. Obama will push it through, by EO if necessary.
Temlakos- 10 diggs
- digg it
- pilgrim2497, on 08/20/2008, -3/+2In the past I have certainly been critical of John McCain, but it is absurd for anyone to say that there is no difference between McCain and Obama, and advocate that conservatives vote for neither man; which would undoubtedly siphon votes and put Obama in power.
There are real and dramatic differences between McCain and Obama that indicate stark and ominous differences in the direction this nation would take after the election:
1. McCain's campaign is not being bankrolled by middle eastern muslims who hate America, Christians and Jews---Obama's is.
2. McCain does not advocate killing a live baby who survived an abortion---Obama has and will.
3. McCain is not influenced by an embittered wife who hates America---Obama is. (He told Rick Warren she is the first one he would turn to.)
4. McCain did not replace the American flag on his campaign plane and literature with an Orwellian, self-worshiping symbol---Obama did.
5. McCain did not spend twenty years worshiping at the feet of an Afro-centric pagan "preacher"---Obama did.
6. McCain is not backed by the radical, socialist media in this country, and around the world---Obama is.
7. McCain does not hold our military in contempt, nor has he promised to gut America's defense budget in order to send 850 million in aid to Mother Africa---Obama does and has.
8. McCain has never been caught on tape dancing and twirling like a fairy queen with Ellen Degenerace on her lesbian TV show---Obama has. (watch that clip and contrast it with the authoritative image Obama tries to project when he is making a speech.)- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+1Pilgrim2497, why don't you run for office? I'd vote for you. You have your head on straight as an arrow. Congratulations on making perfect sense on all 8 points.
- kgregt, on 08/20/2008, -0/+6McCain's campaign IS bankrolled by big business which wants an unlimited flood of illegals and by lobbyists for various foreign governments.
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+0Not necessarily.
I saw him today. He's in dire staights and needs money fast.
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+0Not necessarily.
- robertrutger, on 08/20/2008, -0/+6Right on Mr. Farah! The crest of the Fabian Socialist Society is not the wolf (Obama), but the wolf is sheep's clothing (McCain). Better an avowed enemy than a pretended friend. Norman Thomas, Mr. Socialism himself, stated that socialism made more impressive strides under phony republican Eisenhower, than FDR.
- IvoteGOAfirst, on 08/21/2008, -0/+2You nailed it - on both counts: 1) Eisenhower WAS a phony Republican. Finally, somebody else who knows it, too, and 2) I've been calling McCain "The Manchurian Candidate" for years! When he starts out with, "My friends," (his signature opening) in that condescending platitudinous tone, I cringe. I don't trust him and picture him caving into the demands of LaRaza, MALDEF, et al., erasing the borders for illegal aliens and placating Dems left and right all in the name of "bipartisanship." His voting record and collusion with Ted Kennedy in the Senate should tell voters all they need to know. Another thing, he might have convinced the NRA but not GOA or me.
- Shoprat, on 08/20/2008, -0/+2My concern is that if the Democrats gain total power they will pass draconian hate-speech legislation which will effectively outlaw the conservative viewpoint guaranteeing liberal power for ever, while sites like this are shut down and conservatives who dare question them are imprisoned for hate-crimes. I believe this is destined to happen should the Democrats win total power. If they do there will be no meaningful election in 12.
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+1I agree with you. They have a plan, albeit evil, but nevertheless a plan to destroy America and any Christian who happens to get in their way. Make no mistake--they will undo everything we've come to know and love about this country and they'll do it quickly.
- congresssucks, on 08/20/2008, -0/+4This country is destined for destruction in many ways, and no man will save it. The globalist think they can control this country by turning it into a sewer, they have bought into the saying 'Better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven'. Hell is what they are creating.
- IvoteGOAfirst, on 08/21/2008, -0/+2"...and no man will save it." I disagree. If that's true, why do we bother to vote at all? "We the People" would have the power to save it IF we would all band together and vote for the same candidate whether Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, or Bob Barr - but neither McCain nor Obama! The problem is, as these posts show, we don't want "None of the Above," but some will still hold their noses and vote once again for the lesser of those two evils (McCain or Obama) thereby perpetuating even greater evil then blame other voters for the outcome.
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+1No man will save it--you're right about that. But "we the people" can do something about it if we'll get off our apathetic arses and stand for the right things and stop playing politcally correct games!
- pilgrim2497, on 08/20/2008, -0/+3I stand corrected Dr. Evil---the amount Obama has pledged to Mother Africa is $850 billion, not million.
- muerafidel, on 08/20/2008, -0/+4for temlakos information mc cain did push for the fairness doctrine along with government health care so you have not said which of farah's comments were wrong. Also remember 'conservative" mc cain voted to confirm the socialist ginsburg and souter, if those are your kind of supreme judges you want then i agree, vote for the man. also i didn't even mention where he stands on the illegal invasion: COME ON UP amigos
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+1He's not a Ginsburg or Souter fan. He did that in order to appease the "powers that be." It's not called a political "game" for nothing.
I still think the man deserves a chance. He's real and O thinks he walks on water. Oh what a surprise he's in for!
- nmclassyone, on 08/21/2008, -0/+1He's not a Ginsburg or Souter fan. He did that in order to appease the "powers that be." It's not called a political "game" for nothing.
- TXflyguy, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1Let me simply re-state my comments from yesterday..................You simply do not sow the seeds of success by embracing the values of defeat!
Obama will make Jimmy Carter (remember him?) look like George Washington. If this is your idea of winning, go ahead, make Obama's day!
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is