The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.
"Stupendous Fabrics:" Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s
ashokkarra.com — If there is no security, you can forget about rights of any sort, and do notice that under “states rights” there’s always, no matter how peacefully the argument is put in tone, the threat of secession and insurrection, even now.
gbudavid- 41 diggs
- digg it
- ashok, on 09/06/2008, -0/+6This article is a comment on Federalist No. 9, which states that there are improvements in political science. Funny that - one would think that if people don't really change, how could politics change?
- gbudavid, on 09/06/2008, -0/+4Yeah Old Darwin sure isn't working too well
- cashman57, on 09/06/2008, -0/+5The 4Th amendment says we have a right to be secure in our person property papers and effects and the 2ND amendment says for there to be security in a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The first amendment tell us we have a right to demand the government redress our grievances when they have violated our rights but the government forgets about that part of the amendment as if it does not exist.- ashok, on 09/07/2008, -0/+2The Bill of Rights uses a different logic than the Constitution proper, a very different logic.
For more on this, see Hamilton, Federalist 84: there he says a Bill of Rights is nonsense, because when you say "freedom of the press," you've already given Congress and the Courts an excuse to meddle with the press. Real rights are left unstated.
- ashok, on 09/07/2008, -0/+2The Bill of Rights uses a different logic than the Constitution proper, a very different logic.
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is