- v12kid, on 10/27/2008, -18/+175"She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone," this McCain adviser said. "She does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family or anyone else."
maverick? country first? straight talk express?
what-the-*****-ever
http://anncoulterisaretard.com/- brstilson, on 10/27/2008, -1/+53It's getting more and more apparently that Sarah Palin is the one we should be worried about being the next Bush. She doesn't take advice, goes off-script regularly, doesn't trust anyone, inadequately educated, and is a complete mental midget. It seems to me that she is quite literally a female George W. Bush.
- northwatuppa, on 10/27/2008, -2/+38Well, McCain wanted a maverick. He got one.
Now they're basically calling her a loose cannon. - robdiggity, on 10/27/2008, -1/+38No, McCain wanted Lieberman. As with every other major position he maintained up until a couple years ago, he abandoned his convictions, listened to the "experts," and worst of all believed them.
History is going to have to look back on this guy with tragic sympathy. The conduct against him in the primaries of 2000 was criminal, conduct that was continued and directed at US citizens through the general election in Florida.
Can you imagine what a different man McCain would be, what a different country and world we would be living in, if Karl Rove had possessed even a fraction of a soul? - FemaCampBoy, on 10/27/2008, -39/+2the neocons tried to sabotage her with the stupid neiman clothes. she is fed up with neocon traitors. they are snakes that slither around in the campaign doing everything they can to destroy her. i am fed up with these filthy people. they started the illegal iraq war and now they are ruining palin... and jumping ship to obama their true roots ie communists. what filth. dont fall for cnn's propaganda.
- Akairenn, on 10/27/2008, -2/+21@robdiggity: I have it on good authority that Karl Rove has a shelf full of jarred souls in his basement.
- Charlotte_Web, on 10/27/2008, -24/+3Anti-Obama story: 750 diggs and still no front page:
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_Bombshell_ ... - freehunter, on 10/27/2008, -0/+8femacampboy:
Brilliant troll, and I'll bite. She's doing a damn good job of ruining herself, and why would conservatives try to destroy the best item they have to win the whitehouse: an undereducated, attractive white, country-bred woman? - johnnr2, on 10/27/2008, -0/+11http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Chicago_Public_R ...
The truth to that anti-Obama edited smear campaign - Charlotte_Web, on 10/28/2008, -7/+1@johnr2:
There's nothing there to change the meaning of what he said. It's just the interviews in their entirety. - Berkana, on 10/28/2008, -1/+4@Charlotte_Web:
That's because organized efforts by mccainvote.com to game digg using scripts are probably being counter-acted. At this site:
http://www.mccainvote.com/about.php
it says:
________________________________
What websites does McCainVote.com target?
McCainVote.com targets two social news websites -- "Digg" and "Yahoo Buzz" -- as well as various online polls.
Digg is one of the most popular websites on the Internet, and is visited by about 23 million people every month...
(For the record, Digg and Yahoo Buzz users sometimes submit some trashy stories, so we don't normally recommend visiting those sites. The beauty of McCainVote.com is that you can make a difference on Digg and Yahoo Buzz without actually having to go there!)
________________________________
Don't expect lots of scripted diggs from false accounts to do anything but fail at bringing anti-Obama stories to the front page.
- northwatuppa, on 10/27/2008, -2/+38Well, McCain wanted a maverick. He got one.
- fakekevinrose, on 10/27/2008, -20/+10Stop plugging your website in every post. Honestly, did you think that people would find you cutting edge or hip with your blog post headline like "Sarah Palin is a Satanist" or "Michele Bachmann is a retard"? You write like a 12 year old HALO nerd. Enough.
- TripMoon, on 10/27/2008, -8/+3@fakepaidvinsuck: Stop paying attention to things you hate. Did you really think that people would find you cutting edge or hip with your comments like "Stop plugging your website in every post"? You write like a 12 year old HALO nerd. Enough.
- sagien, on 10/28/2008, -1/+8@TripMoon: he does have a point. I clicked on that link thinking that it was pertinent to his comment. It was not. I had to waste another half a second to hit Ctrl-W to close the window, but he already got the traffic from me.
It was a pretty douchey experience because I don't give a damn about what he thinks past what he says on digg.
I want my two seconds back and the three I spent writing this comment. - TripMoon, on 10/28/2008, -1/+0What about the linking of Obama to terrorists? To me, that is as ridiculous as linking Palin to terrorists. I admire a good joke, given how ludicrous the losing McCain campaign has been run.
- shutaro, on 10/27/2008, -1/+14You know who else was a diva? Hitler, that's who. Think about it.
- Shaggy3, on 10/27/2008, -1/+7Hitler had 3 things,
1. He was very charismatic
2. Very smart, very good at manipulating people
3. Radical views
Fortunately for us, on a scale from 1 - 10 Palin is..
1. Charisma, 8
2. Intelligence, 0
3. Radical views (You betcha!), 10 - Kosh, on 10/27/2008, -3/+8Godwin's Law.
- mikelieman, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2That's what happens when P=1.0
- Shaggy3, on 10/27/2008, -1/+7Hitler had 3 things,
- tykwondingo, on 10/27/2008, -2/+30"A Palin associate defended her, saying that she is "not good at process questions" and that her comments on Michigan and the robocalls were answers to process questions."
Is she "good" at answering any questions? Jesus-titty-*****-christ, this has to stop. How can this woman possibly be considered for office... My cat is more capable.- boot20, on 10/27/2008, -0/+6That's because your cat hasn't sold it's soul to Satan. Palin is pandering to those she knows best, the bigots and the racists.
- geekoid, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Dugg for Jesus-titty-*****-christ... and, yes, at least she seems to have a pair of those.
- Reynardine, on 10/27/2008, -1/+18McCain is trying to distance himself from Palin at last minute.
It won't work.- boot20, on 10/27/2008, -0/+6He shouldn't have picked her in the first damn place.
- deleo, on 10/27/2008, -1/+11Can you imagine McCain winning and something happening to him - so Sarah becomes the President of the United States? This is pretty unlikely to happen, starting with McCain losing. But the fact that she even got this close scares the sh*t out of me. If she became President, there's no doubt about it, your life would change. We would all be bowing down to Queen Sarah!
- sofakinghot, on 10/27/2008, -8/+1Is a blow job off script? http://sofakingtight.blogspot.com/2008/10/sarah-pa ...
- freehunter, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3You don't notice that every other picture on that site is an obvious fake? Nooo, this one must be real.
- mywhitenoise, on 10/27/2008, -6/+4Palin is the whitest diva I've ever heard of.
- Billions, on 10/27/2008, -0/+4Indiana Jones and The Adventures of the Diva Maverick?
- DangerCollie, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8The moose is loose and she's going off the reservation. ROFL!
- maxedo, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Obama crossed the line first, sir. He squeezed them, he hammered them to the point of desperation. And in their desperation they turned to a woman they didn't fully understand.
- maz2331, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Maybe she knows better than take advice from people who are *****-ups?
- brstilson, on 10/27/2008, -1/+53It's getting more and more apparently that Sarah Palin is the one we should be worried about being the next Bush. She doesn't take advice, goes off-script regularly, doesn't trust anyone, inadequately educated, and is a complete mental midget. It seems to me that she is quite literally a female George W. Bush.
- pennsykid2000, on 10/27/2008, -6/+88She's working on 2012 already, as if she had any chance whatsoever to attract serious attention after her disastrous star turn in 2008. She makes Quayle look like an intellectual with gravitas, and his bid for president in 1996 went absolutely nowhere, despite actually serving as VP for 4 years.
- MiserableTruth, on 10/27/2008, -1/+17You hit the nail on the head there. She realizes the McCain campaign ship is sinking and is trying to build her own boat before McCain's is completely submerged. I wouldn't be surprised if she left being a governor and decided to be a senator so she could say she has both executive and legislative experience. Look at what she contradicted him on, or went off script about; 1. Expensive wardrobe: she insists she frugal and insists that she's jut like everyone else in her "Joe Sixpack" real America. 2. Robocalls: calls them irritating which they are, and is something everyone can relate too, again making her seem like everyone else. 3. Pulling out of Michigan: She doesn't believe in pulling out, right Bristol? No, but seriously, this would be for the Republican base, trying to say she might be a stronger candidate than McCain because she wouldn't give up on a place just because they were losing.
Be wary of this woman! Please America, do not allow the McCain/Palin administration take hold of our government. How can they claim to be bipartisan mavericks, when they can't even work properly with each other??- kahoona1, on 10/27/2008, -2/+12The only problem is she was the iceberg that sunk the ship basically...
- Rikety, on 10/27/2008, -12/+1Gov. Palin is worth ten McCains and 13 Obamas.
- Rioracer916, on 10/27/2008, -0/+4More like the failed life preservers. The ship was already sinking.
- boot20, on 10/27/2008, -0/+2I think what your looking for is she's the broken condom....
- mikelieman, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6I hear Ted Steven's old gig is opening up....
- rald84, on 10/27/2008, -0/+5some news are attributing the leaks to people supporting mitt romney. you can bet him and others won't let her get the 2012 nomination without a fight.
- TripMoon, on 10/27/2008, -0/+8That more than 2% of the population may vote for McCain is staggering to consider. The stupidity of even the ones profiting from this mess is manifest in the old fable: The goose that laid the golden egg. If you are wealthy in this country, it would stand to reason that you would wish to keep a powerful, wealthy, not socially chaotic atmosphere in order to preserve your wealth and to make more. Instead, even these short-sighted morons will destroy this country, rendering their wealth worthless in the process. What will 1 billion dollars mean when you are hiding in a mansion in fear with guns and security guards, while the revolution threatens you at every turn outside? Helluva job, Bushies!
- londubh, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2She'll be lucky if she manages to finish her first term as governor. And she's less likely to run in 2012 than Hillary Clinton is.
- neXion, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
-Einstein.
Don't be so sure. Middle America seems infatuated with her. No one was ever infatuated with Dan Quayle
- MiserableTruth, on 10/27/2008, -1/+17You hit the nail on the head there. She realizes the McCain campaign ship is sinking and is trying to build her own boat before McCain's is completely submerged. I wouldn't be surprised if she left being a governor and decided to be a senator so she could say she has both executive and legislative experience. Look at what she contradicted him on, or went off script about; 1. Expensive wardrobe: she insists she frugal and insists that she's jut like everyone else in her "Joe Sixpack" real America. 2. Robocalls: calls them irritating which they are, and is something everyone can relate too, again making her seem like everyone else. 3. Pulling out of Michigan: She doesn't believe in pulling out, right Bristol? No, but seriously, this would be for the Republican base, trying to say she might be a stronger candidate than McCain because she wouldn't give up on a place just because they were losing.
- mepol, on 10/27/2008, -5/+13ROFL! If only! I would pay to see that!
- qdkk, on 10/27/2008, -0/+1May be McCain campaign could run fund-raising events show casing the mavericks get mavericky with each other. pow. pow.
- plimpton777, on 10/27/2008, -7/+148Feminism has just been set back oh, about 50 years.
- robdiggity, on 10/27/2008, -3/+65But Vacuous ***** is riding a snow machine to the future!
- zip000, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6I'm not sure exactly what that means, but it sounds hilarious.
- Ridonkulus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2best sentence ever
- VaporBro, on 10/27/2008, -1/+27Hello I was wondering if you had a few seconds to help end Women's suffrage. Yes we believe that it has been to long and this outrage has gone on long enough. Here, here just take this pencil and sign right there. You're voicing your support to end woman's suffrage. Yup; just sign right there. Supporting to stop the Women's Suffrage anyway we can. Ending Women's Suffrage. No more Suffrage. Thank you so much you are a true American!. End Women's Suffrage!
- macdady843, on 10/27/2008, -23/+4Yep we better abort a couple million more babies to get it back on track!!
- plimpton777, on 10/27/2008, -5/+11Dugg for abortion!
- Hypnotical, on 10/27/2008, -1/+7Did someone say abortion?
- y0smokey, on 10/27/2008, -2/+2I think we should pass legislation to allow on the table abortions. I mean seriously, put Palin on a table and abort her ass. Caribou around the world rejoice!
- Tarl, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1How did we miss you?
- mwilhelm, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1apparently Planned Parenthood Express is installing a drive thru this week.
Would you like to super size for 39 cents more?
- qdkk, on 10/27/2008, -0/+12With Palin's help, we can amend the Constitution to make women second class citizens, bring back slavery, and strip away civil rights from gays.
/sarcasm ...- boot20, on 10/27/2008, -0/+10You forgot "Start World War III to get Jesus Christ to hurry the hell up and end the world so the Rapture will take the good souls (like Palin), but leave the bad souls (like Obama) to live in misery."
- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6The Republicans are still stripping away civil rights from gays.
- robdiggity, on 10/27/2008, -3/+65But Vacuous ***** is riding a snow machine to the future!
- snotrokit, on 10/27/2008, -5/+35"Her lack of fundamental understanding of some key issues was dramatic," said another McCain source with direct knowledge of the process to prepare Palin after she was picked. The source said it was probably the "hardest" to get her "up to speed than any candidate in history." - This kills me.
Hopefully, she will have 4 years to polish up on her "fundamental understanding" From Alaska.- tykwondingo, on 10/27/2008, -6/+2/from the bottom of a well
- NotAChickenHawk, on 10/27/2008, -1/+16I hate to point this out, but I'd have to say that they still haven't gotten her up to speed.
- hangtown2004, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5Thats it shes a much up to speed as that idiot gets
- aoou4444, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5I'm insulted that she can even be put before us as a candidate of such a high position. How can someone be chosen as a V.P. candidate and then brought "up to speed"? Shouldn't it be the other way? I guess we get what we deserve; likability, to my amazement, still seems to be a major factor in politics in this country.
- SheilaNoya, on 10/27/2008, -5/+136The people waving toilet plungers at her rallies seem to like her.
I suppose it's to show support for "Joe the Plumber", but I find it really hard to take the McCain/Palin campaign seriously when they have made the "toilet plunger" their new iconic symbol of economic policy.
The entire campaign has become a joke.- hayzeus, on 10/27/2008, -1/+9Joe the Plumber? No way!! I thought those were ironic references to the 1974 made-for-tv-movie "Born Innocent". Are you sure about this whole plumber thing?
- twiztidsinz, on 10/27/2008, -1/+19They've got plungers cuz if McCain/Palin get elected this country will be so far in the crapper it wont be funny.
- ultraseamus, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3Ug, I have been avoiding as much political crap as possible (beyond Digg I am waiting until the day before I vote to do all of my research) are there really large numbers of people waving plungers at her rallies, or is it just a couple crazies?
- SheilaNoya, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2There are quite a few of these idiots waving toilet plungers now.
Here's a pick of some McCain/Palin fans who were protesting Obama in Virginia (4 guys & 5 plungers, so I guess they even brought a spare!)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/17/pl ... - ultraseamus, on 10/28/2008, -3/+2*sigh* If they did not have the sign up I would question whose side they were really on.
Meh decided to look into the whole "Joe the Plumber" thing. At least he is not an idiot, and actually seems to have brought up solid concerns with Obama's tax plan which I share. Does not justify plungers at a presidential rally, but at least it came from somewhere logical. And I suppose since they are just trying to represent this average guy the opposing party will probably not dare touch them, or use it against republicans. Which is good because I would not a couple idiots with plungers to have any kind of effect beyond their own votes.
- SheilaNoya, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2There are quite a few of these idiots waving toilet plungers now.
- pintomp3, on 10/27/2008, -0/+10it's sad that a fake plumber is a national hero while a soldier like Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan is not. if anything, the crowd at the mccain/palin rallies would call this fallen solider a terrorist.
- kotn2012, on 10/28/2008, -3/+1Have you said this before?
- WilliamKalessin, on 10/28/2008, -0/+0I thought they were waving plungers to show their allegiance with the Daleks.
- ma6ic4l, on 10/27/2008, -3/+42But but but...She's a breath of fresh air!
- gnocchi1442, on 10/27/2008, -6/+4Don't you mean "a bresh of freath air"?
- innocentsinner, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Why are you digging him down? Did you forget the debates already?
- Yerknutz, on 10/27/2008, -6/+10yea, a breath of fresh air like a fart in a car.
- tomarocco, on 10/27/2008, -4/+7That was just the Massingill you were smelling.
- TheDreadDiggerD, on 10/28/2008, -1/+4Smells like vinegar.
- gnocchi1442, on 10/27/2008, -6/+4Don't you mean "a bresh of freath air"?
- LemonHerb, on 10/27/2008, -3/+962012? I'll be surprised if she gets re-elected as Governor. She should be working on securing her seat behind some Fox News cameras because that's her best bet for the future.
- kahoona1, on 10/27/2008, -1/+10She WAS an anchorwoman if I'm not mistaken.
- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1A newsreader
- Olfster, on 10/27/2008, -0/+10Not with that whiny voice. I don't think even Faux News entertainment channel would take her with that voice. It's like fingernails on a chalkboard.
- vermax, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3time to start organizing tours to go ***** on her lawn the day after the election.
- steel66, on 10/28/2008, -1/+0Can replace BillO...
- kahoona1, on 10/27/2008, -1/+10She WAS an anchorwoman if I'm not mistaken.
- lhbaker, on 10/27/2008, -4/+67Palin = footnote
- Winkythecat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Palin=Scary as hell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6HK3fFKmVg
- Winkythecat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Palin=Scary as hell
- cheesegypsy, on 10/27/2008, -2/+34What exactly does the McCain campaign want to say? I'm still trying to find some kind of central message besides, "Don't vote for that guy because he's evil." They have "Country First" emblazoned on every available surface, but it's meaningless because they never built a message around the slogan. Obama says "Hope" and "Change" and no matter what you think about his campaign, those monikers stick and he drives them home at every rally and in every ad, so much so that both Hillary and McCain tried to co-opt the phrase in failed attempts to steal his platform. In both cases, though, they just looked silly.
It's ironic that the military man is the one who completely lacks discipline in this election season, while the so-called radical is unwavering. We are finding out that a senator can be a maverick--a president cannot.- skago, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3I agree 100%. I have yet to hear 1 thing from McCain's campaign. I think America also sees the difference when a few days ago 40,000 people showed up to Obama's rally and 500 showed up to McCain's.
- LordofthePoles, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Yeah that's a surprising irony you pointed out. Sad when a young 47 year-old has more discipline than a war vet
- magus_melchior, on 10/27/2008, -1/+43Someone should pull a Gollum on McCain's ear:
"Pssst! Hey, John, you didn't hear it from me, but Sarah's planning to wait for you to kick the bucket so she can have the White House to herself."- Reynardine, on 10/27/2008, -2/+16I don't think McCain cares what he does as president. He just feels entitled to the presidency because he's a spoiled brat.
- s0krat3z, on 10/27/2008, -1/+5He does give that I'm old, a POW, a Republican, not black so I'm entitled impression. I guess it never entered his mind that there are Americans left that care about other things than war, greed and religion.
- aaronirwin31, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2She wouldn't wait for him to die. The minute she got the feeling that McCain had every intention of treating her like a pretty face to greet dignitaries and attend state funerals; the second she felt like she was being kept out of the loop; she would go ballistic and turn on him. She would march to the nearest media outlet that would listen and sell McCain out as a corrupt Washington insider hindering her ability to help save America from evil. I'm fully convinced she would turn on him in a heartbeat to serve her own political ends. She wouldn't wait for him to fall on his deathbed.
- Reynardine, on 10/27/2008, -2/+16I don't think McCain cares what he does as president. He just feels entitled to the presidency because he's a spoiled brat.
- VaporBro, on 10/27/2008, -5/+19How about Sarah Palin last night hEHH?! How 'bout 'hur, HHEHHH?!? How 'bout the job she did?! HHEHHH!?
- LordofthePoles, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1He looked like a scary old pervert grandpa.
- anonblog2008, on 10/27/2008, -2/+30She "maverick-ed" the "maverick".
She's "shakin' up" Washington so much that she gonna reform her running-mate. - toetagger, on 10/27/2008, -3/+482012 my ass, she's done. Finished. Capute. Toast.
- Spor, on 10/27/2008, -1/+5I really hope you are right. But I fear she has got a taste for higher office and will do whatever it takes to get it back. Not to mention all the people in Utah who are in love with Palin. I have to drive with a blindfold on so I don't have to see all the McCain/Palin bumper stickers. Makes me ill...
- pintomp3, on 10/27/2008, -1/+4she might end up like pat buchanan and troll the pundit circuit.
- diggduggDOOM, on 10/27/2008, -0/+5Kaput + Capote = Capute?
- LordofthePoles, on 10/28/2008, -0/+0Seriously I think she should run for President in '12. So for the first time ever, we can have an incumbent beating the challenger by 80 to 20.
- BunnyGlitter, on 10/29/2008, -0/+0I went to a party a few weeks ago and had to listen to some old woman wax poetic about Palin. A lot of people really, really like her. What is most annoying is that the reason they like her has NOTHING to do with qualifications. They like her personality. It has me really wondering about the effectiveness of the democratic process.
- Spor, on 10/27/2008, -1/+5I really hope you are right. But I fear she has got a taste for higher office and will do whatever it takes to get it back. Not to mention all the people in Utah who are in love with Palin. I have to drive with a blindfold on so I don't have to see all the McCain/Palin bumper stickers. Makes me ill...
- ScrewedThePooch, on 10/27/2008, -4/+7LOL! GG McLame. QQ prz
- rebotfc, on 10/27/2008, -3/+29What a Maverick, pew pew.
- slapded, on 10/27/2008, -4/+10"Over the weekend, sources told CNN that long-brewing tensions between Palin and key aides to McCain were on the rise."
OBAMA 08- k4f123, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1as long as voter turnout is good... obama should have this.
- deepthot42, on 10/27/2008, -0/+35To quote Charlie Day on It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia:
"WILD CARD BITCHES!"- Shaggy3, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Palin's just jumping out of the van before it explodes.
- k4f123, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1dugg for quoting IASIP.
- surface1080, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1I wish I could digg this 1,000 times.
Funniest episode Ive ever seen. My room mates and I still say it about once a day.
Who cut the brakes?
WILD CARD BITCHES
- fishbeef33, on 10/27/2008, -2/+6She's setting herself up for 1012. She's hoping that there are enough stupid men who want to ***** her and stupid women who somehow look toward her as a "role model" that she can get the nomination herself next time.
I hope she's right, because there are far more people on the other side who are smart enough to vote for the other person (or pigeon, or cactus, or WHATEVER would run against her) so that it'll be an easy win for us.- sockpuppets, on 10/27/2008, -2/+241012?
I fail to see what McCain's birth year has to do with this.- fishbeef33, on 10/27/2008, -2/+8Oh, my god. I am a dumbass.
- Akairenn, on 10/27/2008, -1/+19Judging by her religious lunacy, she'll be a shoe-in during the 1012 elections, unless we get organized and vote in a viking now.
Thorkell the Tall for Jarl in '12! - mrseptic, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3She'd make a wonderful feudal lord. Joe The Serf supports her!
- fishbeef33, on 10/27/2008, -2/+8Oh, my god. I am a dumbass.
- tykwondingo, on 10/27/2008, -3/+14you betcha, we're *****' time traveling!
^_~ - SirFink, on 10/28/2008, -1/+01012? Typo but strangely appropriate. Pres. Palin would bring us back to the Dark Ages. Let's go burn us some witches!
- sockpuppets, on 10/27/2008, -2/+241012?
- Callik, on 10/27/2008, -2/+37I'm waiting for the Onion article where Palin announces to run as an independent in the Maverick party.
- ChiaGod, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3With Tom Cruise as VP and Mel Gibson as her secretary of state?
- wastern, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2I'm waiting for that to actually happen...
- davidg11, on 10/27/2008, -34/+2And yet, Obama only leads in the polls now by 5 points
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTR ...
"Obama leads McCain by 49 percent to 44 percent among likely U.S. voters in the daily tracking poll, which has a margin of error of 2.9 points. Obama's lead has dropped over the last three days after hitting a high of 12 points on Thursday.
"Things are trending back for McCain. His numbers are rising and Obama's are dropping on a daily basis. There seems to be a direct correlation between this and McCain talking about the economy," pollster John Zogby said."- davidg11, on 10/27/2008, -33/+2When you lose 7 points in the polls in 3 days, it isn't McCain who has the problem.
It's Obama.
The more you cackle about your surefire victory, the lower Obama's poll numbers fall.
No one wants to see Obama square off with Russia or North Korea. PERIOD. They'd eat him for dinner.
Even Biden knows that.- FallenTurtles, on 10/27/2008, -2/+10Obama *would* have to fight them himself since our military is all but running on empty after several years of warmongering tactics utilized by a power hungry political party trying to remind the American people of the one good thing they can still do: kill people.
- jarjarwang, on 10/27/2008, -1/+4-1
- scubaman5000, on 10/27/2008, -1/+5http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/
- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3538 is saying "John McCain is making no progress in his pursuit of the White House. Our model now projects Barack Obama to win 351 electoral votes to John McCain's 187, and to win the Electoral College 96.7 percent of the time to McCain's 3.3 percent. Both numbers are unchanged from yesterday."
- mwilhelm, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2Seriously, this race should not even be close.
Pros:
Side A: VP: Resounding intelligent male voice for women. P: Law professor who understands community integration, family values and the rewards of hard work.
Side B: VP: HOTTT Female voice for sports fans, hunters and Jesus. P: grandfather time kicks you off his lawn.
Cons:
Side B: VP: Religious fundamentalist who bans books, shoots defenseless wolves from a helicopter, and hates autistic fruit flies. P:grandfather time still bitching about the lawn and now the grizzly bears.
Side A: BLACK MAN.
Looks like race is still an issue guys, otherwise this would not even be close. You can;'t tell me the 20% of the republican supporters in this election closest to the center are supporting McCain because they think he's the right choice.
They support him because he isn't the "uncle-tom socialist trying to give lazy people free money".
What's that saying in politics about projecting your own weaknesses onto your opponent?
It's completely absurd that the GOP can run the country like this for 8 years, and their campaign exactly the same way - complete with its own scandals, disregard for due process, misappropriations, cronyism, firings, bigotry, flip-flops, etc, etc, etc and yet the black guy who has run the most organized grassroots campaign in history without public financing and demonstrated a definitive drive for excellence and achievement is still only ahead by a statistical margin of error.
Are we really that stupid?
Ignorance makes the ***** taste a little sweeter, doesn't it.
- appleofdischord, on 10/27/2008, -2/+8Zogby has become a partisan push-poller. Nice try.
Check out intrade for some more accurate odds. Or at least realclearpolitics.- davidg11, on 10/27/2008, -7/+2What? Zogby had Obama up by 12 points.
How is that partisan against Obama?
lol
Let me get this straight. Zogby gave Obama the lead of 12 points 3 days ago because it was their intent to shed 7 points from that lead three days later in order to bias the outcome for McCain.
What are you smoking?
Conspiracy theorists amuse me to no end. - appleofdischord, on 10/27/2008, -0/+5I'm not talking about points, I'm talking about polling practices.
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Zogby_Now_Engagi ...
- davidg11, on 10/27/2008, -7/+2What? Zogby had Obama up by 12 points.
- nybe, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2get a clue: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/presi ...
- flannerus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1and yet, you write the same ***** constantly. and yet, this story has nothing to do with Obama. and yet, you and anyone else who copy pastes this ***** is going to be crying on election day.
- davidg11, on 10/27/2008, -33/+2When you lose 7 points in the polls in 3 days, it isn't McCain who has the problem.
- duckkg5, on 10/27/2008, -2/+14didn't her on-script moments irk McCain people, too?
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&q=katie% ... - JoeMondo, on 10/27/2008, -2/+30McCain/Palin is one short story that reflects the whole of what has happened in the GOP.
The old, reasonably intelligent, small government fiscal conservatives needed to broaden their appealto win elections, so they invited the zealous, charismatic fundamentalist whackos into the party.
Like Frankenstein's Monster, they thought they could control the religious right, but the religious right had their own agenda and took over the party for the most part. Instead of the old guard using the religious right to gain power, the religious right used them without hesitation.
And that's what happened with McCain/Palin. McCain thought she'd be a compliant thing - no doubt owing to her inexperience and lack of qualifications. But Palin had her own agenda, and couldn't care less about old man McCain.- gaqua, on 10/27/2008, -0/+18Well said.
"Conservative" has nothing to do with the Republican party anymore. Due to the influx of the Christian Fundamentalists, being fiscally conservative has been tied to teaching creationism in public schools and demanding abstinence-only education before we provide AIDS relief to Africa. Like the problem is that Africans just don't know how not to have sex or something...
I yearn for a day when a Conservative and Liberal can sit down and have discussions together without namecalling or emotional blackmail. I don't want to hear Conservative arguing for Pro-Life, because a conservative shouldn't want government intervention in private affairs. Conservatives shouldn't be arguing against gay marriage because the government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all, marriage should be a religious institution and marriage certificates being offered by the state is an example of government respecting an establishment of a religious practice.
Conservatives shouldn't have been involved in the Terry Schiavo case because small government shouldn't have a place in the hospital to tell people what to do.
But unfortunately, the "Conservative" party has given way to the "I care more about your problems than I do about my own" party. People making minimum wage, people scraping by, and they are voting Republican, against their best fiscal interests, because they believe in Pro-Life or Anti-Gay-Marriage concepts.
These are not Conservative ideals. They're socially intrusive and not the place of government.
The Declaration of Independence states that all men are created equal, and that we have certain unalienable rights. For a true conservative, those rights should extend as far as possible provided that they do not infringe on the rights of another citizen.
A true Conservative believes the government's place is not to coddle or support people, but to protect them from harm both foreign and domestic, both fiscal and physical, and to provide an outlet for those who feel the need to address their grievances with the government itself and other people.- Twag86, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3Finally a conservative who isn't retarded posts something in their defense.(assuming you are a conservative)
The gay marriage issue is an issue because gay people would like the same legal standing for their unions as straight couples. This includes such things as hospital visits and job benefits. - OliveStreet, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3HOLY CRAP! I think of myself as a liberal, and a violent one at that. But you, Sir, can be my friend anytime.
- Rioracer916, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3Well said, for everyone except the super rich and religious extremists, the Republican party is a walking contradiction.
Problem is, if the Republicans ditched the religious right, they'd be smaller than some 3rd parties...so they'd have to ...*GASP* move a little more to the center in order to gain supporters.
Oh no! I guess Governor Arnold was right... - gaqua, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2@Twag86: I'm not a conservative, in fact I'd say my arguments tend to be more progressive. However, I can respect those who are true conservatives. It's a difference of philosophy, really. When we're talking philosophy, there's no need to be rude and argumentative, as amusing as it is.
It comes down to whether you believe in true freedom (anarchy) or a complete fascist commune, or where you are on that scale, really, since very few people would argue for one or the other.
If Anarchy and Fascism are a 0-100 scale, respectively, then current Democrats and Republicans are both ranked in the 70s.
I'm not advocating anarchy - far from it - but I think we need to re-evaluate which laws are necessary to the safety of the group as a whole, and quit worrying about stupid crap that affects a minority, like Abortion laws and Gay Marriage laws.
Why don't people care about issues that directly affect them anymore? We've been swindled to believe that Gay Marriage affects our heterosexual marriages more than tax policies affect our well-being.
- Twag86, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3Finally a conservative who isn't retarded posts something in their defense.(assuming you are a conservative)
- gaqua, on 10/27/2008, -0/+18Well said.
- metaliq, on 10/27/2008, -2/+48I'm sick of Palin.
- venicerocco, on 10/27/2008, -2/+5Yeah, he's done NOTHING good since Monty Python
- KeillRandor, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Hey - I liked his travel programs - (from pole-to-pole etc.) - shame he didn't take the other Palin with him - she needed to go more than he did...
- venicerocco, on 10/27/2008, -2/+5Yeah, he's done NOTHING good since Monty Python
- kratsnitram, on 10/27/2008, -1/+16CNN contributor and Republican strategist Ed Rollins said Palin was "mishandled" during the earlier part of the campaign, and as a result, "she's become a target of a lot of ridicule."
But, he said, "She definitely is going to be the most popular Republican in this country when this thing is over."
Jesus, that's sad. Sort of like saying she will be the most popular Fascist in the country when this thing is over...- defwheezer, on 10/27/2008, -0/+2"She definitely is going to be the most popular Republican in this country when this thing is over."
haha- she may well be 'cause there's not very much competition for "most popular Republican". - rblancarte, on 10/27/2008, -0/+3Is this really what Republicans want?
Sure I get that Neo-Con that Rovian politics has brought out want Palin as their candidate, but, really, is she was the true conservative base wants? Look at what a lot of them are saying (Colin Powel, George Will, etc) - the direction that the party is going is not good.
Can the true conservatives steer the ship back to the right course? Or is it too late? - nepidae, on 10/27/2008, -0/+1Maybe this will help end "handling" candidates. All it does is hide what they really will do once they are in office. Personally I would rather someone talk for themselves even if I don't agree with it than say something prepackaged by their handlers which they won't follow through with in office.
- defwheezer, on 10/27/2008, -0/+2"She definitely is going to be the most popular Republican in this country when this thing is over."
- spam2040, on 10/27/2008, -1/+10
- wilhoitm, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Wouldn't it be scary if she was a Stepford wife!
www.imdb.com/title/tt0327162/ (2004)
www.imdb.com/title/tt0073747/ (1975)
- wilhoitm, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Wouldn't it be scary if she was a Stepford wife!
- NotAChickenHawk, on 10/27/2008, -2/+9Has Palin out-mavericked The Maverick himself?
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3Yeh. McCain is the only one aloud to be Mavericky......even though he doesn't do anything Mavericky....
John McCain is just another mouseketeer in the NeoCon mickey mouse show.....definitely NOT a maverick among them. He's like their pied piper...or mickey mouse himself...
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3Yeh. McCain is the only one aloud to be Mavericky......even though he doesn't do anything Mavericky....
- iloveobama, on 10/27/2008, -42/+1I want free stuff!
Obama promises me free stuff!
I wanna vote for Obama, but no one has given me a pencil!
I wanna free pencil so I can vote for more free stuff!- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -0/+9what about mccain's free money for banks choc full of pork barrel spending and free money for insurance in "tax" rebates for people who don't pay taxes? Did you get that?
- iloveobama, on 10/27/2008, -11/+1You mean the one that Obama and the overwhelmingly majority of democrats voted for?
- herrferret, on 10/27/2008, -0/+6Its a troll! Don't poke the Troll!
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2You mean the one that Ron Paul voted against....? That one?
But you don't get the point. John McCain is SUPPOSED to be against that stuff, but yet he eats it up like pie!
Completely un-republican of him! That's why I'm voting for Obama, because Obama is supposed to be liberal like that.
Republicans need to be republicans and stand for republican values. THAT'S the reason they are going to lose this election.
The more the republican base screams that they need to get back to republican values, the more the NeoCons think they need to be more Liberal than the Liberals!
I can guarantee you that Obama would be more conservative than McCain. Hell....Clinton was BY FAR more fiscally conservative than Bush..it's not even close. It's like Bush was the anti-conservative when he completely expanded government across the board! McCain is following in his footsteps backing socialist measures of buying out banks? Give me a ***** break!
Completely sickening. They won't get my vote until they have their house back in order and weed out the NeoCons such as McCain, Leiberman, Romney, Ghouliani...and these:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Neo-con ...
- omegared, on 10/27/2008, -0/+5I want to stay in Iraq for 100 years and see more young Americans die, lets stay in Iraq. Republicans like death right???
Vote McCain 08. - OliveStreet, on 10/27/2008, -0/+4If you were extraordinarily rich, say you owned an oil company, John McCain would give you everything you asked for---all free, or course---even as you invested all your tax savings heavily in those off-shore jobs that pay people 13 cents a day to produce crap that Wal-Mart can sell here.
- macgarp, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1I want free clothes from Saks and Neiman's!
- flannerus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1iloveobama is just as extreme as Building 7 conspirators!! Yeah, socialists and Islamic extremists will just cavort in here and no one will do a goddamn thing!!!!! I can't ***** WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/s
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -0/+9what about mccain's free money for banks choc full of pork barrel spending and free money for insurance in "tax" rebates for people who don't pay taxes? Did you get that?
- fleischner, on 10/27/2008, -22/+4Yeah, this is much more important than the things Biden and Obama have said lately. That Obama's election would bring international crisis to the US means nothing when compared to comments about one woman's clothing. Obama's redistribution of wealth is a mere sideline when we could be talking about a wardrobe. Way to focus, liberals.
- iloveobama, on 10/27/2008, -11/+3Do not question Obamessiah. Buried
- herrferret, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Do not be a massive right wing troll running interference, ignored.
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -1/+13Good thing Bush isn't running AGAIN or ***** like you would vote for him.
- ToTiredToCare, on 10/27/2008, -1/+7Ah yes. More redistribution drivel. What the ***** do you think the Bush administration has been doing for the last eight years? Only with them, the money is distributed among the rich. Oh but that doesn't count because your don't know anything about that, right? You're just regurgitating the stuff I heard on Rush this morning.
Liaf, just like Ashley Todd. - jessehadden, on 10/28/2008, -1/+5We currently have a system of distribution of wealth. The wealth is distributed, in exponentially increasing amounts, to the wealthy. Much of this is because of "corporate welfare," tax cuts for the wealthiest elite, and a regressive tax structure that places more burden at the bottom. (Sure, dollar values are higher for the obscenely wealthy -- but Bill Gates misses a million dollars a lot less than Joe the Fake Plumber misses $10,000). This has resulted in a nation where 95% of the wealth is concentrated in the hands of 5% of the people. This is not freedom.
So, yes, a system of "re-distribution" sounds in order. After all, that 5% can't do a damned thing with their money if the other 95% shrug.
- iloveobama, on 10/27/2008, -11/+3Do not question Obamessiah. Buried
- TTARider, on 10/27/2008, -23/+3is there a reason ALL of the Presidential information on Digg has to be Pro Obama and Biden, and negative on republican? Apparently Everyone on digg is a democrat and a zombie ?
- Ne007, on 10/27/2008, -0/+12no, but if you aren't anti-bush policy by now you are a retarded zombie.....
- nhand42, on 10/27/2008, -0/+8BRAAAINNSS
Finds Sarah Palin, taps on head, hears hollow sound, zombie shuffles away from Palin.
BRRRRRAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNS - teebird, on 10/27/2008, -0/+5Repeat after me..."User-driven content...user-driven content..."
If you haven't contributed a pro-GOP story or dugg one, stop whining. - flannerus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1YEAH, TTARider, why don't they all mass together and support the OTHER candidate? What's the difference??
- SirFink, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Democracy's a bitch, ain't it?
- eth3l, on 10/27/2008, -20/+3This is on CNN and front paged on Digg but Biden's persistent foot in mouth comments?
***** amazing.- flannerus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Biden isn't an actress, so he doesn't get all the media attention. You're not intelligent so you don't get any Digg attention.
- rdldr1, on 10/27/2008, -2/+6Why do we care about her wardrobe? I sure don't. If the Republicans want to dress with gold-plated suits, that's there problem. Less money for actual campaign work.
- brusty, on 10/27/2008, -13/+2Buried as inaccurate. They know exactly what she thinks and what she stands for. This is just political posturing and nothing more.
- nybe, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2you don't get to bury when you're not in the majority.
- BiIlyMays, on 10/27/2008, -10/+12Digg me down
- tomarocco, on 10/27/2008, -1/+4Don't tell us what to do, Billy. It was gonna go down that way without your input to begin with.
- defwheezer, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3It's all about the Brains!!!!!!!! (pun)
- chanelgal, on 10/27/2008, -1/+3sarah palin is thinking about after the election. Good thing Alaska state ethics law prevents gov. from profiting and gaining financial interests , and having outside employment.
- Rioracer916, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2Ethics!? Since when does she care about a silly thing like that?
- chanelgal, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1you r absolutely right
- wilhoitm, on 10/27/2008, -2/+5McCain's ego was too big to pick a male VP. So McCain picked a female VP because he thought she would be more docile and controllable. I guess he does not get out much!
- Rioracer916, on 10/27/2008, -0/+2He used to controlling powerful women (see: Cindy McCain and her fortune). Problem is, most powerful women don't act like Stepford Wives.
- diggduggDOOM, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2I don't think that's accurate. By most reports, McCain wanted Joe Lieberman for VP.
- gweller, on 10/27/2008, -19/+2***** hilarious. Diggtards go ***** when Palin isn't a sheep for the RNC. Diggtards are all about being sheeple.
- teebird, on 10/27/2008, -1/+8Do you have anything resembling an idea to offer?
Do you know what an idea is?- gweller, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Here's an idea, stop being ignorant sheeple and hugging Obama's nutts like he is the 2nd coming.
- teebird, on 10/27/2008, -1/+8Do you have anything resembling an idea to offer?
- mrseptic, on 10/27/2008, -0/+8A maverick, by definition, works alone. How the ***** did they think this was going to end?
- rmeddy, on 10/27/2008, -0/+27She's so Mavericky, She's such a Maverick she Mavericks Mavericks
p.s. Maverick. - sch123opinion, on 10/27/2008, -1/+6It is all really simple, after 8 years of complete failure on every level by the entire Republican organization from the President, those serving in his Cabinet, Republican Vice (Vise) President , the Republican Senate and Republican Congress ( they did have control of that for 6 of the 8 years even though they try to blame Democrats in the Congress for 21 months for all their problems) there was just nothing for a Republican to use as a reason to keep that party in power. They put and old man out there to run on empty and he picked a complete zero to run with him. They were lost before they started and the team is an insult to the American voter to even have to listen to or consider them.
- stuckonnews, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2What about the blond hair streaks? Really hers from her favorite consignment "-do" shop and not the RNC??
- nycmac247, on 10/27/2008, -3/+2MORE ***** crazy commentary!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b8_weUY - akchrs, on 10/27/2008, -20/+3Once again CNN uses fictional characters in their story.
"Some aides" "A senior McCain adviser" "A Palin aide" "Several McCain advisers suggested" "A Palin associate" "A second McCain source says"
Not one name again. Nice try liberal/progressive democrats. EPIC FAIL!!
http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/cnn-slants-t ...- skago, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4Most sources from inside a campaign are bound by a confidentiality contract, so they ask to remain anonymous in order to keep their jobs. Not the writer's fault, they are bound by ethics to comply with requests to remain anonymous.
- sevenhelmets, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Any chance we can loose the whole "Epic Fail" thing? I mean, really? No, seriously? It got old the 9,165,784,304 time it was used.
Theres nothing epic about what you said, it's a common reporting standard to honor source confidentiality. Using a source's name when they have specifically requested not to be named is a sure-fire way of loosing all credibility in the journalism world. So it's not a fail either.
- GreyHobbyHorse, on 10/27/2008, -15/+3Barack Obama spent $5.3 million on his styrofoam Greek temple and got a smaller audience draw than Sarah Palin who only spent $150k on clothes. So who is it that makes better use of money.
- CedarPark, on 10/27/2008, -4/+2If Obama wants to tithe to himself, and give unto the church of Obama, he is protected by the Bill of Rights buddy. Look it up.
- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2What is the source for the claim that the set cost $5.3 mil?
- cmootoo, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2For all the money spent which one of the two mentioned has a record disapproval rating of 60% of the people polled?
A lot of good that $150k did her. Couldn't even make her popular. - JoeMondo, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2Obama made a far better use of the money.
His donors are happy with it.- CedarPark, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1The election will decide that.
- Infowarmachine, on 10/27/2008, -2/+8how is this the best the republicans can offer? a crazy old man with a corrupt and traitorous past whitewashed with lies and .. more lies
and a crazy semi hot woman with a corrupt past whitewashed with 'hey shes hot' also she has nice clothes..
wtf how did these jerks 'win'?
its like they are GIVING the race to obama as had as they can- CedarPark, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2traitorous past? sources?
- alexkreuz, on 10/30/2008, -1/+0alaska secession movement. you must not be paying attention.
- CedarPark, on 10/27/2008, -1/+2traitorous past? sources?
- teamgwho, on 10/27/2008, -1/+11**But, he said, "She definitely is going to be the most popular Republican in this country when this thing is over."**
//picks jaw off the floor.
McCain had many qualified running mates to choose from, and although I disagree with them ideologically, Romney, Tom Ridge or Lieberman would've made excellent choices since at least they had experience, name recognition and could pass themselves off as knowledgeable (and in many casews they would be knowledgeable). She is the reason this ticket is going to lose. I think a lot of voters might be able to forgive McCains gaffs and erratic behavior if they felt there was somebody solid to back him up.
Instead the ticket has a VP who has no experience, is a liar, and is patently partisan. She may be able to pass herself off as sensible and intelligent in her home state on the smaller stage, but she is completely out of her league on the bigger stage. If she wants to take a shot at 2012, and the GOP actually likes her better then the other far more qualified candidates, who am I to tell them no? - robthom, on 10/27/2008, -7/+5I totally had a hot Sarah Palin dream this morning.
Its funny how I have no control over that. Its like I'm 2 people sometimes. - richirwin, on 10/27/2008, -4/+2She's so nifty.
She'll make a great President one day.- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3/s ?
- tnoy, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2President of the McCain fan club.
- richirwin, on 10/28/2008, -2/+3President of tonguing my hairy *****.
- secrity, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3/s ?
- macdaddy357, on 10/27/2008, -1/+5Of course she is not keeping all of those clothes. She can't be seen in the same outfit twice! It is all on its way to landfills on trash day.
-
Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions




What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the