digg

She should just start her own party, "The Clinton Party", and get it over with. It is all about her anyhow. No cost too high to feed her ambitions.

From the letter:
"They're the old guard, and this is how the Democratic Party used to function — the big donors called the shots. But the small donor revolution has changed that. The 20 people who signed this letter have given Democrats an average of $2.4 million per year over the last 10 years. Small donations now dwarf that: In February alone, Obama and Clinton raised $47 million in small donations."

"Still, old habits die hard. We need to send a strong signal that we, the small donors, will back Democratic leaders who have the courage to stand up and do the right thing. Please sign our statement today. http://pol.moveon.org/democracy/ "

signed and sent to 50 others to sign

Here's my latest idea for ending this thing. Perhaps someone could write a legal document that makes the superdelegate's commitment to a candidate unchangeable. Initially, none of the superdelegates would be bound to a candidate. However, if they were to sign this document, that would force that person to vote for the candidate on that document. This way, a superdelegates support would be even more sold than a pledged delegate. Here's why I like this idea. Obama will need the votes of at least some of the superdelegates to win the nomination. That means that we can go all the way to the convention without knowing who the nominee is. Although many of the superdelegates have supported Obama, they can change their mind at any time, for any reason. That means that Clinton can stay in this race to the convention, claiming that she still has a chance to be the nominee, even though her fate has long since been sealed. However, if the superdelegates support was set in stone, at some point in this primary process, Obama will have enough delegates to clinch the nomination, and we can all have a party, watch the balloons fall, yell and scream, etc.

Another idea being floated, donate to the DCCC. The group the fat cats have threatened to withdraw their support from. A little poke in the eye you could say, but it makes a big point.

***** THE RIAA!!1!!1!!

Oh, wait.

Queue the programmed anti-MoveOn drones.

Come on, Is it really necessary to respond to Pelosi?
She sold out about 1 day after becoming leader.

The irony of Move-on, who's funded by the biggest liberal "fat-cat" there is, George Soros, of bitching about Clinton's "fat-cats".

Wait...moveon.org talking about billionaires using shady tactic to influence the election? Holy crap!

I guess they are just jealous because everything that moveon has tried has backfired in a big way. Such as how they helped Bush win re-election in 2004.

Pelosi can't even stand up to Bush and Cheney. Why should I have her back?

Wow, so much rage against Clinton's shady dealings.

Where were all you ***** when Bush was raping the USA, spending trillions on a war that you're losing, and giving $300 million contracts to 22 year olds with ties to the mafia? I remember hearing sweet ***** all back then.

But now you're on the game! Great work, morans.

Mebbe the Billionaires could start their own party? The Bullish Bastards and fake blond bitch glorified whores Party

so these must be the people urging Clinton to hang in there, as so far it's obviously not the majority of voters, and is this what Clinton potentially represents, another bought and paid for president. hopefully this is last desperate false step that ends the myth of the war hero Clinton.

"It's the worst kind of insider politics-billionaires bullying our elected leaders into ignoring the will of the voters."

What do you think the Super-Delegates are there for? Are you Democrats really so dense that you can't figure it out? Democrat party LEADERS (ie: the Super-Delegates) do NOT trust the people to choose their nominee. If they trusted the people to choose the nominee, they wouldn't need the Super-Delegates now would they? If, as this article erroneously states, the Super-Delegates are to follow the will of the people, then why even have the Super-Delegates? Makes you proud to be a Democrat I'll bet. lol

By the way, the Republicans don't have Super-Delegates. They trust their constituents.

If the two parties are really broken down along ideological lines, then it proves the old adage: Conservativeism relies on intelligence, Liberalism relies on ignorance.

MoveOn.org is headed by George Soros, the ultimate billionaire fat cat manipulator. You democrats are clueless droolers.

It's to get rid of the Super Delegates because it only exacerbates what is going on in the Democratic party.

That fact that those fat cats are so interested in Hillary winning that they'd resort to this makes me like Obama - and even McCain that much more.

Man how I love how this is tearing the Democratic Party apart. Yesterday was the first time I actually saw two democrats in a heated argument with each other over Clinton/Obama. Good times!

Leave it to the democrats to screw up a sure win. We really need a viable second party.

Oh man, this whole Obama/Clinton fiasco is starting to get good. Hold on a sec, let me go grab my popcorn and put on my slippers.

... OK, back... on with the bickering :D

Oh great, the same people that leached off of Bill Clinton getting a BJ and telling everyone to just MoveOn (yes, that is how it originated) is now understanding what idiots they were then.

How long will it take to figure out they are being idiots now?