digg

Join DiggAbout

Martin Luther King's Message - Obama Got NOTHING on Ron Paul watch!

youtube.com — Look at the resemblance between Ron Paul and MLK. AMAZING video!

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • WTC7WasPulled, on 01/10/2008, -6/+41And imagine the Neocons tried to paint Ron Paul as a racist. American people should feel insulted by the neocon elites to think they are really that stupid. Ron Paul is a man who loves every individual and will fight to the end for the liberty of every individual. Dr.Paul continues the fight of Dr.King against racism. The fight for individual rights.

    Thank you Ron Paul and we won't stop the fight. No matter election fraud or ridicule we won't stop until the American people and the people of the world know the truth. America can be great once again. Peace.
    • GhostyBoy, on 01/10/2008, -0/+9When the odds look dim or even impossible we have to remember what it is we are fighting for, and how important it is. Generations depend on our commitment to the message of peace and freedom in the face of even the most overwhelming diversity.

      Never give up hope. Even if we fail, I for one will go down content in the knowledge that I fought for something worth saving.

      I will go down fighting, or not at all.
  • conza88, on 01/10/2008, -6/+31Ron Paul will do more for Peace, Freedom, Liberty & Truth, than any other politician in modern history!
  • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -39/+9Ron Paul is nothing but the worst kind of racist scum and to see his acolytes making these pathetic attempts to tie him to the legacy of Dr. King is sickening. Ron Paul is as worthless a human being as has ever served in Congress.
    • jksturm, on 01/10/2008, -7/+20Do some real research.
      • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -19/+9I have. You should try it some time.
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2hes like those 8 year olds that get on multiplayer games and acts all tough cuz hes safe in his moms basement 5- 1200 miles away, i bet hes not even old enough to vote. Has tortured animals to death. Molested or possibly been molested and he is completely incapable rational thought and or dialogue. Because his mental processes have something wrong. .hes so dumb you just have to feel sorry for him. its impossible to reply because hes got the mind of a sick child.
        • neopolaris, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1You can't read.
      • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -2/+12you didn't see his post? It's riddled with real research like :

        "Ron Paul is nothing but the worst kind of racist scum"
        "Ron Paul is as worthless a human being"

        Dude stop being in denial, ron paul is Hitler reincarnated sent here directly by satan himself to reinstate slavery and destroy America.
        Didn't you read the newsletter?
        hahahah
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2You know herk if someone is touching you inappropriately you need to get help, go to your school nurse and ask for help. Or if you've got a kidnapped hiker in your basement you need to turn yourself in. Killing that person will not fix your soul do the right thing.
    • katie212, on 01/10/2008, -6/+17I speak from experience and am one of his constituents...You? He is the best and this is why we continue to vote him back into office you jughead.
      • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -14/+8He's a racist scumbag. I could pick random people off of the street that would make better candidates than Ron Paul.
        • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -1/+8better candidates than Ron Paul = drop more bombs on a-rabs than ron paul would.
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2Again foot in mouth and he has no clue. Is it a learning disability or are thier really people who get so stuck up they cant even imagine they dont know everything. .....YOU MIGHT BE A NEOCON i wonder if hed be such an obnoxios douche bag in person. Ugh i wish his tooth was stuck in my knuckle
        • artemus, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1I can pick people off the street, who would be better character witnesses for Ron Paul than you are, Herky baby.
    • soulmantim, on 01/10/2008, -7/+16Herk, if you were alive when MLK jr. was alive you would have probably believed that MLK jr. was a Communist or a "Pinko" like the media tried to paint him.
      • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -12/+10I was alive when Martin Luther King Jr. was alive and I thought that he was one of the bravest human beings I had ever seen. I still believe that he was one of the greatest Americans in the history of this country. Only an ignorant, arrogant Ronbot would try to tell me what I thought of a man that has always been one of my heroes.
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -9/+6"Herk, if you were alive when MLK jr. was alive you would have probably believed that MLK jr. was a Communist or a "Pinko" like the media tried to paint him."

        You mean like how Ron Paul tried to paint him, right?
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2Do you even pay attention to him or is your head really that far up your ass. He doesnt even slur people who attack him. He wouldnt even say anything like that. He just simply stomps them with facts like you get stomped evertime you say something so unbelievably stupid and then do the "oh yeah im so smart dance" with your foot in your mouth. And because of the belligerence/arrogance/stupidity you immerse yerself in you cant even see that you make an ass of yourself every single post. ....YOU MIGHT BE A NEOCON
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+1How can you even call someone worthless period and in regards to congress hes often been the only one defended the constitutional position. Man you've got a serious imbalance.
    • WTC7WasPulled, on 01/10/2008, -7/+13You must really hate America Herki you neocon.
      • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -11/+10I love America. How do you feel about Canada? I'm not sure why someone that likes and supports Ron Paul is constantly sticking his nose in to the internal affairs of other nations where he has no business. I thought you people were all about non-interventionism?
        • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -2/+8is this your buzzword for today? So you believe that talking with another nation and discussing politics is intervening?
          I don't see why you're complaining...shouldn't you be happy he's not using Ron Paul's evil approach of not attacking countries and bombing them into oblivion?
        • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2So you do hear the message and that its consistent and you still lie?
    • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+6I can't recall, JHerky, whether you said you were Airborne or S.F. Medals? Or don't ya get those for draft dodging? But you just did that so you could go to MLK's protest activities, right?

      Every time I see pathetic arrogant touchholes like you and the rest of your little clique tearing Ron Paul down, I'm more convinced than ever that supporting a man of his obvious character and integrity is a thing that must be done.

      That you take every opportunity to insult, slur and demonize a man whose message has so much in common with that of Dr. King both typefies and accentuates your own hypocrisy.

      • rich6985, on 01/13/2008, -0/+4WELL SAID....very pathetic attempt...it only brings more credibility to the message....
    • dmjarrington, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2@Herkimer56

      You suck.
    • rexblade, on 01/13/2008, -0/+1Herk can i meet you id like to show you something.
    • neopolaris, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1Your discernment is for *****.
  • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -33/+10Surely Martin Luther King would have called himself a communist pedophile, just like good ol' Ron Paul did.
    • katie212, on 01/10/2008, -7/+10You live up to your name...CHAOS indeed you are and do try to stir..
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -8/+4I haven't TRIED to stir up anything, I let Ron's actions and ignorant well-wishers make him look bad.
      • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -2/+10"I haven't TRIED to stir up anything,"

        hahahahahahahahahahahahhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahAHAHAHAHAH
        • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -6/+3Well, maybe a little :)

          He just gives me too much material to work with!

          PS: Where in Seattle are you based, card? No ill intention, i'm just curious.
        • artemus, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1Nah, you invent the material yourself.
    • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+9Ron Paul did not call MLK that. It was another author but Kirchick lied and tried to put it on Ron Paul
    • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+2scroll up, touchhole.
  • xander, on 01/10/2008, -5/+28very touching! please spread this video
  • theuniversal, on 01/10/2008, -19/+6There are some good things about Ron Paul. But Ron Paul is very much for state rights and thinks the federal government should stay out of what state legislatures do. When MLK marched there were states that were dead set against equality for blacks. As we all know, the federal government forced them to integrate. It's still an issue with schools today. MLK was about freedom and equality for individuals, not freedom and equality for state legislatures. So give us a ***** break.
    • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -14/+10The Federal Government forced them to uphold the US Constitution. That's something that people like Ron Paul are still fighting.
      • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+4Allow me to correct, O haughty herky:
        That's something that people like Ron Paul are still fighting FOR.
        You're welcome, hypocrite.
    • theuniversal, on 01/10/2008, -8/+8No, Ron Paul is fighting for his interpretation of the constitution, which favors a weak federal government and strong state governments. His position on abortion is one example, where he has no problem with a state legislature asserting control over a woman with an unwanted pregnancy. In other words, he puts the religious views of the state majority over and above the right of an individual to choose.
      • ostracize, on 01/10/2008, -1/+8Better it be the religious views of the state over the collective majority of religious views across the country. Why should Texas' views influence Maine's? Or Utah's? Or Hawaii's?

        Any viewpoint that could differ by demographic should be decided at the state level.
        • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -5/+6dude it's pure evil...all part of Ron Paul's crazy scheme to exterminate the nation's population.
          You should talk to Herk about it...he'll use one of those voice disguisers and meet you in a dark alley at 3 am to tell you all about it.
          • ostracize, on 01/10/2008, -1/+5I'm Canadian and we had to implement this to keep the French happy. And let me tell you it works. Sometimes the Federal government will mandate something that the provinces must follow eg. free Health care, but we let the provinces run it their own way and it works fine.

            This concept of conglomerating departments at the federal level only serves to divide the populous and causes these branches to steal valuable resources from each other (eg. Military taking money that could be spent on health)
      • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+5No the constitution says in the 10th amendment in the bill of rights
        "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
        It is the states purpose to choose not the Federal government's - Paul is correct
        • dinsy, on 01/10/2008, -0/+4You would think this would not be that difficult to grasp. I think the founders thought that future generations would intuitively understand empowering individuals to support freedom but TV and education has deprogrammed the public to the point where they don't realize the threat of tyrannical government.
    • UKLooney, on 01/10/2008, -0/+10Shouldn't state legislatures uphold people's freedoms too?
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -7/+5Ron Paul and his cronies don't give a *****. It's your "freedom" to be oppressed if you're poor or otherwise unable to change states.
      • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+4Every state's constitution I have read contains the equivalent of the Bill of Rights.
        It is up to the citizens of each of those states to make sure that their constitutions' provisions are followed.
    • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -8/+8State legislatures should but frequently they do not. That's why we have a Supreme Court which forces state legislatures to obey the Constitution. Of course Ron Paul does not agree with that. He's even introduced legislation which would prevent the Supreme Court from hearing certain types of civil rights cases. Remember that when a Ronbot tells you that Ron Paul is for equal rights they are either ignorant of Ron Paul's real agenda or they are lying to you.
      • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+5Show us the bill that supports that statement. He was upset with the supreme court for not hearing a case about religious freedom specifically "under God." He would actually want to appoint a strict constructionist to the Supreme Court who would obey the constitution more closely.
    • swaddict, on 01/10/2008, -1/+5"When MLK marched there were states that were dead set against equality for blacks. As we all know, the federal government forced them to integrate. It's still an issue with schools today." You can force integration, but you can't force equality as a cultural value. The laws are a quick fix to say "we did something". If integration was such a good idea, then why is it still an issue with schools today? Values cannot be imposed, they have to be willingly accepted.
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -6/+2The hicks will never accept it, but their integrated children did in number, and their grandchildren do even better. I'm not concerned about the retarded southern holdouts.
      • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+6so we should impose morality chaosium? Sounds like you want to do exactly what you accuse the Christian right of.
        • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -5/+1"so we should impose morality chaosium? Sounds like you want to do exactly what you accuse the Christian right of."

          Forcing whites to allow blacks access to their establishments is not the same as consentual "crimes" such as being gay.
      • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+4"Forcing whites to allow blacks access to their establishments is not the same as consentual "crimes" such as being gay."
        In his haste to play both the race card AND the phobic ***** card, chaosium provides us with a fine example of the disorganized thought processes which provided the inspiration for his moniker.
        Still trying to figure out why blacks would need to be allowed access to their own establishments. Or why being 'gay' (what a Newspeak perversion of a word that formerly denoted normal frolicking) requires consent.
        Fail for syntax.
    • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+3"MLK was about freedom and equality for individuals, not freedom and equality for state legislatures..."
      Sounds very much identical to RP's message.
      And I do not recall having heard or read anything by either one about your absurd reference to state legislatures.
  • BohicaTwentyTwo, on 01/10/2008, -21/+10http://www.tnr.com/downloads/solicitation.pdf

    I have unmasked the plot for world government, world money, and world central banking. Planned exchange controls to hold you hostage…while the dollar drops down a hole…

    I revealed the Red debt bomb set to explode in your bank account…The real, financial reasons Bush invaded Panama. The nightmare of a ‘cashless society’ (watch out for it, if they get away with the New Money)…

    I’ve been told not to talk, but these stooges don’t scare me. Threats or not threats, I’ve laid bare the coming race war in our big cities. The federal-homosexual cover-up on AIDS (my training as a physician helps me see through this one.)

    The Bohemian Grove – perverted, pagan playground of the powerful Skull & Bones: the demonic fraternity that includes George Bush and leftist Senator John Kerry, Congress’s Mr New Money. The Israeli lobby, which plays Congress like a cheap harmonica. And the Soviet-style ‘smartcard’ the Justice Department has in mind for you.

    SIGNED BY RON PAUL
    • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -20/+10The man is clearly insane.
      • xander, on 01/10/2008, -5/+6Yeah, the man that wrote that clearly is, but the mans name isn't Ron Paul.
        • BohicaTwentyTwo, on 01/10/2008, -8/+9Then why did Ron Paul sign it?
        • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -7/+6Sign it, endorse it, promote it, and write articles for it.
    • jcm267, on 01/10/2008, -15/+6Looks like Ron Paul was wrong here! He's imagined some grand plot behind the "new money", or what probably was the redesigned $100, 50, 20, 10, and 5 dollar bills. I don't understand how anyone trusts this man's judgement enough to even consider him for Congress, much less President.
    • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -3/+11are you kidding me? I agree with everything he says there.
      What is wrong about it?

      "I don't understand how anyone trusts this man's judgement enough to even consider him for Congress, much less President."

      We don't expect you to understand not wanting to invade foreign countries and kill people...it's far beyond your pale.
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -3/+6"We don't expect you to understand not wanting to invade foreign countries and kill people...it's far beyond your pale."

        Ergh, this is one of the things many of us agree with Paul on. He's not wrong about everything.
    • Observant1, on 01/14/2008, -1/+2I have unmasked the plot for world government, world money, and world central banking. Planned exchange controls to hold you hostage…while the dollar drops down a hole…

      >>>as the private bank federal reserve has doubled the money supply twice over the last 8 years and now wont even release the M3 report how much they are printing and circulating.

      I revealed the Red debt bomb set to explode in your bank account…The real, financial reasons Bush invaded Panama. The nightmare of a ‘cashless society’ (watch out for it, if they get away with the New Money)…
      >>>as they push for everyone using trackable cards and change the face of the currency to more resemble what is standard in europe..

      I’ve been told not to talk, but these stooges don’t scare me. Threats or not threats, I’ve laid bare the coming race war in our big cities. The federal-homosexual cover-up on AIDS (my training as a physician helps me see through this one.)
      >>>as we now have over 35 million illegal immigrants who have been taught in school about "la raza", "aztlan" and "reconquista" by the ford foundation in south america. people in south america are schooled how to hate the USA. HIV/AIDS was created in a lab and IS moreso transmitted among gays and blacks is the facts. this does not make someone who is aware of it a racist or homophobe, they are just aware of how TPTB are using and abusing people. saying it is easily taken out of context to twist it into something racist.

      The Bohemian Grove – perverted, pagan playground of the powerful Skull & Bones: the demonic fraternity that includes George Bush and leftist Senator John Kerry, Congress’s Mr New Money. The Israeli lobby, which plays Congress like a cheap harmonica. And the Soviet-style ‘smartcard’ the Justice Department has in mind for you.
      >>>bohemian club is evil, and probably more racist than the history of the mormon religion, joseph smith was a mason/illuminati before he started his own CULT. nazi germany was in control of the area they named isreal in 1948 and nazi's are still running it is obvious by what they do. the US had operation paperclip to bring nazi war criminals to the US with full pardon: rocket scientists to give us NASA, propaganda artists to steer government and public opinion of it, security specialists (SS) to form the CIA that bush senior was part of since its creation. this is why the US government (infiltrated heavily with nazi's) jumps anytime isreal says "frog", they are the SAME NAZI'S. but SOME PEOPLE just dont get it, dont want to hear it.
      nazi's posing as jews, who are ready to scream "you're anti-semitic" about anyone in opposition of what they are actually doing, a reverse psychology "race card" that is working for them because people dont understand the truth of things. it isnt "jews" we dont like, its these NAZI's posing as "jews", and these NAZI's posing as our leaders: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/es ...
      but lets put SIGNED RON PAUL all in caps to try to demonize...
  • UKLooney, on 01/10/2008, -5/+16The SURGE is gaining momentum. Martin Luther King Day is when we attack.
    • Herkimer56, on 01/10/2008, -15/+9Planning on finishing higher than fifth somewhere? Just so you know, it's not going to happen.
    • ringelman5, on 01/12/2008, -0/+4Jrk-a-herky must have an 'in' at Diebold.
  • jcm267, on 01/10/2008, -20/+5I don't think that Martin Luther King would be stupid enough to take the threat that Islam poses to Western Civilization lightly, so please refrain from posting Islamic apologist propaganda alongside Dr. King. I also don't think that Ron Paul's supporters should be exploiting Dr. King's legacy by comparing him with a closeted racist like Ron Paul.
    • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -3/+14"I don't think that Martin Luther King would be stupid enough to take the threat that Islam poses to Western Civilization lightly"

      So you think MLK Jr. would suddenly reverse his stance of non-violence and be for the bombing and invasion of two nations?

      "so please refrain from posting Islamic apologist propaganda alongside Dr. King."

      Please, PLEASE refrain from posting warmongering government apologist propaganda alongside Dr. King.
      • jcm267, on 01/10/2008, -5/+7Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence. He would not have accepted Osama bin Laden's excuses as a reason to not go to war. I can just about guarantee that. Nowhere did I try to tie Dr. King (who, unlike Ron Paul, I admire) to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (which I agree with). I cannot tell you what Dr. King would have proposed we do about Islamic Jihadists and, though I'm pretty sure he would not have advocated going to war, I'm willing to say that he wouldn't paint them as the innocent party that your sides seems to do. I also suspect that he would have condemned Islam and urged Muslims to at the very least reject the most arcane aspects of it.

        You see, Grandmaster B, I can respect and admire someone who would do the complete opposite of what I would do.
      • jcm267, on 01/10/2008, -6/+4****edit: Arcane is a bad choice of words. Replace it with any one of the following: inhuman, insane, violent, oppressive, misogynistic.
    • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+9He is not a closeted racist it is just what some people want to paint him as.
    • dmjarrington, on 01/13/2008, -0/+4@jcm267

      Why do you believe in the war when there is so much evidence that it is based on lies? Don't you know that questioning the government's motives is a part of the American spirit? It is what established this country. If you support the war(s) then you are supporting liberal nation building policies that will one day cause this country to collapse.

      Aggressive preemptive war is un-American. MLK are Ron Paul are both kings of men. You'd do well to listen more closely.
    • dmjarrington, on 01/13/2008, -0/+2"I don't think that Martin Luther King would be stupid enough to take the threat that Islam poses to Western Civilization lightly..."

      You're full of it.
    • neopolaris, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1troll...
  • harlowsmonkeys, on 01/10/2008, -16/+4Ron Paul opposes all of the civil rights legislation that was necessary to move toward bringing about MLK's dream. Under Ron Paul's stated policies, States would be free to segregate the schools, have separate facilities for different races, etc.

    Do Ron Paul supporters ever actually READ his writings? He is not pro-liberty. He is anti-Federal power. If States want to arbitrarily restrict liberty, that's fine with him.
    • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -12/+2That man would have told MLK to his face that the solution to segregationism is to allow sundown towns and all blacks should just move to another state.
      • card51short, on 01/10/2008, -1/+9no he woulda looked him in the face and said we need to stop all these unconstitutional laws of treating people differently because of something as stupid as race.
        • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -9/+1That's exactly my point.
        • artemus, on 01/14/2008, -0/+1No, your point was that unconstitutional laws AID people. His was that they discriminate against them. Do you want to stop now, or do you wish to continue embarrassing yourself?
    • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+10WRONG. Ron Paul is against forced integration not legal segregation which he is vehemently opposed to
      • harlowsmonkeys, on 01/10/2008, -7/+2His vehement opposition doesn't extend to actually preventing it. His policy is that it is a State matter, and if a State wants to do it, they can. He may personally think that States should NOT do it, but that won't stop them. What stopped them was Federal power.
        • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+4the Federal government only has the right to step in when the states are violating the rights afforded to all people in the constitution. Otherwise it is up to the states to decide. With segregation the federal government stepped in to enforce prohibition of legal segregation which is a violation of of the constitution.
        • harlowsmonkeys, on 01/10/2008, -3/+2Your last sentence is ambiguous. Are you saying the Feds violated the constitution by stopping segregation, or that the States violated it by enforcing segregation, and so the Feds were Constitutionally justified in ending it?

          Ron Paul's view is the former. Read his writings on the 14th Amendment, which is what the Feds used to justify stepping in. In Paul's view, the Supreme Court was wrong to decide that the 14th made much of the Bill of Rights applicable to the States.
        • Observant1, on 01/14/2008, -0/+2no, the feds were up to their ears with the people trying to stop it. they infiltrated the equality movement with radicals to stir more racist hatred. they infiltrated the hippie movement with hard drugs so they lost it and got rounded up.. then they made new racist laws to even more unfairly unbalance the problems and forcing integration on the schools to promote even more confrontations. same goes for "gay rights" and "hate crime" laws.. you have to have experienced it all first hand to see past the smoke and mirrors con jobs being pulled.
      • chaosium, on 01/10/2008, -6/+1One and the goddamned same.
    • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+10http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul381.html
  • deboosher, on 01/10/2008, -2/+21im canadian, but i wish i was an american, so i could vote in this election. instead of just digging these ron paul stories, you better get out there and vote, otherwise you're doing nothing for your own liberty.
  • swaddict, on 01/10/2008, -2/+18RP is a tricky dude. He voted against a medal of freedom for Rosa Parks. Does that make him a racist? He also voted against the same for the Pope. A bigot? He voted against it for Ronald Reagan.
    What was his reasoning for voting against the Rosa Parks medal? He was not against the medal at all. He simply thought that tax money should not pay for it. If Congress wanted to give her a medal, than how about they all buck up and pay for it themselves. When was the last time you heard of a politician willing to spend his/her own money and not government money? And Ron was willing to pay for the medal himself. Is that something a racist would do?
    Looking at Ron's views really challenges me to think. And those challenges can be uncomfortable. It forces me to think about how much politicians are influenced by special interests, so how much do they really care about me? His consistency makes me realize how inconsistent other politicians are, how we get promised the same thing from year to year which never happens. His resolve makes me realize how often other politicians have been pushed and bullied into taking actions they would not normally do. His refusal to accept corporate or special interest money makes me wonder how much money other politicians accept, and how much does that influence affect them?
    Just how screwed up are things?
  • rizzo2008, on 01/10/2008, -1/+12RP's real views on Racism and government (older pre-campaign article)
    http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul381.html

    3rd party response to newsletter's / New Republic article
    http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=41 ...
  • elleanee, on 01/11/2008, -1/+8Ron Paul is the epitome of a latter-day prophet. He's persecuted by the ignorant masses, all the while he's bringing a message of peace, prosperity, and liberty to the American people. We can only pray for those ignorant masses, unduly influenced by the yellow journalism of the old media and the endless greed and inhumane criminals running our country, that they wake up before it's too late and we've lost our freedom and individuality in enslavement to the elite ruling class.
  • czernel, on 01/11/2008, -2/+7Ron Paul is the man this country has been waiting for.
  • czernel, on 01/11/2008, -1/+3http://www.freeatlast2008.com/
  • lvp1138, on 01/12/2008, -2/+1The video needs to be made a bit shorter for it to go more viral...
  • beelzebush, on 01/12/2008, -2/+4The people that fight against Ron Paul will all be dead from starvation soon but then again,so will we .Goodbye America I ***** hate you .
    • chaosium, on 01/13/2008, -2/+2Go the hell away. Why don't you go live in a cabin in the woods like all the rest of you bigoted inbred hillbilly survivalists.
  • PHiZ187, on 01/13/2008, -0/+3Wow, I find this really offensive.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.