digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Manic Monday at MSNBC? Courtesy of Ron Paul Supporters.

linkcrusader.com — How about we make Monday Morning a little more exciting for our friends at MSNBC? Here's a contact list. I'm sure these people would be delighted to hear from you. Let's see if we can't digg this up to the main page shall we?

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • lilyrdape, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10www.RonPaul2008.com
  • tkinnun0, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1Please digg down these Ron Paul stories as spam. The elections are who knows when, so one story per week should be enough.
  • FunkBuddha, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13sorry tkinnun0, we need the media exposure. the only we will get any is to make them cover him. MSNBC's own poll has Dr. Paul in the lead, but they refuse to acknowledge it. These people are supposed to be reporting the news, yet they are not. So we must hold them accountable.
  • FunkBuddha, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10Here is a list of email addresses that didn't bounce. I'm sure the phone numbers for the other folks still go somewhere!

    nina.bradley@msnbc.com,mark.effron@msnbc.com,ramon.escobar@msnbc.com,phil.griffin@msnbc.com,val.nicholas@msnbc.com,
    marc.rosenwasser@nbc.com,alana.russo@msnbc.com,erik.sorenson@msnbc.com,mel.weidner@msnbc.com,cynthia.antoniak@msnbc.com,
    tom.busby@nbc.com,stefanie.cargill@msnbc.com,robert.dembo@msnbc.com,alison.hawley@msnbc.com,stephanie.himango@msnbc.com,
    steve.hyvonen@msnbc.com,nick.kovijanic@msnbc.com,sandra.lilley@msnbc.com,alla.lora@msnbc.com,steve.majors@msnbc.com,
    danny.noa@msnbc.com,michael.rubin@msnbc.com,richard.stockwell@msnbc.com,susan.sullivan@msnbc.com,mike.tanaka@msnbc.com,
    robin.touval@msnbc.com,essa.yip@msnbc.com
  • interpaul, on 10/24/2007, -1/+10Just to let you know - Digg has been burying Ron Paul articles all yesterday and today. Fair speech my ass! haha
    • ffejrey, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1Quit copying and pasting the same comment in every article.
    • interpaul, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4@ffejrey

      and you're gonna make me? i didn't think so. :D tough nuts!
    • diablo75, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Are you sure about that? I was online for 12 hours solid yesterday, watching Digg Labs like it was going out of style. I don't recall any Ron Paul posts being buried by other Digg users, unless you're talking about those posts that would link to some blog that was no longer than two paragraphs and characterized Ron Paul as being the worst of all the GOP debaters. Yeah, THOSE were likely buried, or nobody voted on them after a couple hours. They had no idea what they were talking about. Ron Paul really is the best candidate for 2008.

      Rudy screwed up on the abortion question, he's a cross dresser, a mob boss imitator, praises George Bush and is disrespectful to NY firefighters.

      McCain's stance on the war would have us believe we'd be over there until the year 2016, if he didn't re-institute the draft, which he'd just might try, pretty much committing political suicide. But he wouldn't touch the subject until he was voted into office. Once the votes are cast, and elections are over, politicians can go back to doing whatever the ***** they want, even if it's not in the best interests of the nation.

      The rest of those GOP candidates, I can't say much for and I don't know them. What I do know is that NOBODY is talking about anyone else except those three: Ron Paul, Rudy, and McCain. And of those three, at least on Digg, Ron Paul comes out FARRRRRR in the lead over the other two, and for very good reason. He's founding father material, a doctor who's given birth to over 4000 babies, and a principled man who does not flip flop.
    • Cutkomp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Haha, you noticed too?
    • Cutkomp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5@diablo --- "Are you sure about that? I was online for 12 hours solid yesterday, watching Digg Labs like it was going out of style. I don't recall any Ron Paul posts being buried by other Digg users, unless you're talking about those posts that would link to some blog that was no longer than two paragraphs and characterized Ron Paul as being the worst of all the GOP debaters."

      I was on for more than 12 hours and saw many dozens of Paul buries come through. Heck I've gotten a half dozen or so pretty good ones buried in the last day or so myself. Some I can understand, others are just buried by haters. It wasn't just for the two-sentence blog posts either, it was well-written articles by major media outlets.
    • Cutkomp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@gmason

      I see you are hanging around, what's your view on the happenings?
  • FunkBuddha, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Hmmmmm.... looks like you were right interpaul... it's been buried.
  • viktro, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2If you want him to be taken seriously you are going to have to step away from the internet and hit the streets, because the digg vote isnt gonna get him anyhwere in the primarys.
  • NH4RonPaul, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Time to move on to the May 15th debates. Write to FOX and warn them ahead of time you expect FAIR AND BALANCED REPORTING and good questions for RON PAUL who WON THE MSNBC debate!

    Write to: yourcomments@foxnews.com
  • cywar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Here is what I emailed:

    Dear Sirs

    Perhaps you should hit the books and read up on what this country is "supposed" to represent.

    I am concerned about the fact that you chose not to give Ron Paul much coverage after he clearly won your on-line poll.

    While I realize he is not the candidate you are paid to push down our throats, I felt I should remind you that the United States is not a fascist state just yet.

    You people should be ashamed that we can get more relevant information from Jon Stewart over at Comedy Central than we can from MSNBC.

    Please deliver the news that Americans need to hear, not the manufactured BS.

    I may even have to give up on Keith Olbermann because of this too.

    Sincerely Disappointed viewer

  • FunkBuddha, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Why do you ignore the votes of 80,000 people? Is it because you're
    embarrassed? Did your polls not turn out the way that you intended for
    them to?

    Digg.com is making you look like fools to the Internet community.
    That's hundreds of thousands of potential viewers that now know the
    truth about what you're doing. Hundreds of thousands of people that
    are waking up to the fact that they can't trust MSNBC as a legitimate
    news source.

    The American people deserve better than this. Your news agency is a
    disgrace. What are you going to do about it? Perhaps you'll go after
    digg.com and try to get them to remove the articles, but before you do
    that take a look at what happened when digg.com tried to censor the
    HD-DVD key.

    Infuriated,
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.