Discover and share the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
John McCain and his global-warming train - By David Limbaugh
worldnetdaily.com — McCain, about global warming: "The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge." David Limbaugh: "No, Sen. McCain, the most relevant question is whether political leaders will have the diligence to study this issue and the integrity and courage to stand up to the propaganda of the enviro-bullies."
johnny2k- 18 diggs
- digg it
- cashman57, on 05/13/2008, -2/+15I still am waiting for someone to ask the question"Why must the data from volcanic activity be omitted in order to show global warming?"
So far none of the global warming computer models factor in volcanic activity because if they did the global warming problem would disappear. - bullcutter, on 05/13/2008, -4/+10Hahaha. The "conservative" candidate is a phony sellout shill, willing to say anything for a few extra votes. How sad. He's going to look particularly pathetic when he loses the election by a landslide in November.
- johnny2k, on 05/13/2008, -2/+11The question is, BC, who will McLame lose too in a landslide????
- Taquoshi, on 05/14/2008, -1/+5I'm not arguing here, but I think there are 'way too many wild cards in the game to confidently predict who will or won't lose the November election, especially with Operation Chaos out there. There are so many possible outcomes based on events that could go either way...like what happens if Recreate '68 really does show up and creates a riot in Denver, or if the superdelegates nominate Obama, or Hillary takes the endorsement. Each one of those scenarios has the very strong potential of changing the outcome of the November election and Heaven alone knows how many variations on the theme that could happen between the caucus and the election. Plus there had been numerous news article that have reported threats of the black community to vote or not vote depending on who the nominee is. All this jive talking is hard to sort out, so I don't think there really is any way to predict who will or won't win, unless you have a crystal ball.
- johnny2k, on 05/14/2008, -1/+2"and Heaven alone knows how many variations on the theme that could happen between the caucus and the election. " Who knows, maybe even that Discombobulated Dream scenario which I won't mention here because certain people (you know who you are!) have been having nightmares.... :D
- Christianptriot, on 05/13/2008, -2/+9Anyone, regardless of political affiliation, who takes the climate change issue without dong any of their own investigation into it, is a fool.
- USNavyBlue, on 05/13/2008, -2/+9The Global Warming Hoax - to scam the American people into Global taxes to fund their own imprisonment by the NWO!
- grahamjj, on 05/14/2008, -1/+3This global warming thing is another exercise in human vainity, another tower of Babel. If we think we can control solar output, (Mars' polar ice is also melting) or control CO2 emission and cool the planet we may as well fit our planet with a solar filter around the globe. Do we think we can solve this problem. How about earthquakes and hurricanes. Maybe a twister or two. What vanity?
- johnny2k, on 05/14/2008, -2/+2Profound thoughts! I loved that one! You are quite right.
- Kizilbash, on 05/14/2008, -2/+2How far off the map extreme right do you have to be before McCain starts becoming a left-wing candidate? You guys must think Mussolini was a leftie too...
But then again, you still think Global Warming does not exist. The US is fast becoming a provincial backwater like Afghanistan. - KJeffV, on 05/14/2008, -0/+3"Here are my questions:
"In 1970, when environmentalists were making predictions of man-made global cooling & the threat of an ice age & millions of Amers starving to death, what kind of gov't policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?
"When Ehrlich predicted that England would not exist in the year 2000, what steps should the Brit Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent such a dire outcome?
"In 1939, when the US Dept of Int warned that we had oil supplies f/only another thirteen yrs, what actions should Pres Roosevelt have taken?
"Finally, what makes us think that environmental alarmism is any more correct now that [Greens] have switched their tune to man-made global warming?" — Walt Williams - chicofaraby, on 05/14/2008, -2/+1I find it amusing that the same nuts who are climate change deniers also think Iraq was chock full of WMD and that Europe is being taken over by Muslims.
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by