digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

See the original image at huffingtonpost.com

Jason Linkins: Hillary Clinton Ad Features Osama Bin Laden:

huffingtonpost.com — "As Talking Points Memo notes, "Dropping a last-minute bomb in order to sow doubts about Obama among the late-breaking undecideds -- and doing it in the guise of an ad only mentioning Hillary -- worked in Ohio and Texas. Camp Hillary is hoping that the tactic will deliver a second time."

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • MotherGinSling, on 04/22/2008, -4/+28So, even Bill Clinton is opposed to Hillary's fear-mongering tactics.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3He was for them, before he was against them.
      • MacMan88, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Don't you mean 'he was against them, before he was for them?'
    • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -13/+2Fear mongering? 911 happened. I think too many hippie liberals are happy to think otherwise or believe 911 shouldn't matter and we should go all ghandi and just join hands and protest peacefully until Osama decides to disband Al Queda. ***** hippies.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+17I know that if you watch a little too much Fox News Channel, you are led to believe that anyone who doesn't fear terrorists is a "***** hippie" who wants to sing coombaya with bearded muslims. I also know that you are so afraid of terrorism that you are willing to sacrifice your freedom for a false sense of security.

        *****, you are more likely to win the lottery, or be struck by lighning, or die in a car accident, or a falling brick from a building facade, than you are to be a victim of terrorism. Yet you are willing to go along, to give in to political pressures, and accept diminished rights, restricted movement, taking off your shoes to get on a plane (and soon, to have some $7.35 an hour TSA employee looking at you "naked" through an X-ray scanner).

        I'm sorry that your public school education failed you. Those of us who actually cared to learn about American principles see terrorism for what it is, a violent attempt to force change upon a society. When you react with fear and allow laws to be passed, rights to be curtailed and treaties to be circumvented as a result of terrorism, you are handing the terrorists exactly what they wanted in the first place. *****.
        • hittnrun, on 04/22/2008, -4/+1Typical hippie, "It's not gonna happen to ME" mentality, that is, until something happens and then its GWB's fault for not doing enough. Get back down into your mother's basement. The grown-ups will take it from here.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3hittnrun, do you work the same shift with lukasmith and bingonbony at the blogosphere warfare center or whatever it's called at MacDill AFB? Or are you on the day shift?
      • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -9/+1American priniciples? Go tell that to slave labor in Asia that makes sure your dream of cheap houses, cars, ipods, and wiis can survive. These people will probably never even own a wii. I own a wii. I love my wii. But our asian slaves will never get to play one. Of course now the slave labor is demanding better wages. I suppose you will stand in their way with your big American principles. Where were Americas great principles for the last 330 some years? Unlike the hppies that Obama represents I see reality. And the reality is America never had the moral highground to begin with. Our wealth and power is built on the backs of starving 1 dollar a day slaves all over the world. If anything the reality is that Bush is protecting the American dream. And the American dream is built on slave labor. Hell ask one of those illegal immigrants you love so much why slave wages in America were worth swimming here for.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+10Why do you contradict youself so easily, without even seeing the irony of it?

          You accuse people of being hippies, then you accuse those hippies of supporting the system you were just lashing out at them for speaking against.

          You should have that looked at. You really don't know what you believe, you just know a bunch of guys yelled really loudly at each other in support of what you believe on Fox News.

          When you finally get an appointment with a therapist, the first thing you should mention to him or her, is "cognitive dissonance", then let him or her sort it out for you.
        • Eezyville, on 04/22/2008, -1/+3I didn't know America was around for 330 some years?
    • Kautylia, on 04/22/2008, -6/+3This article is stupid. Among a montage of problems currently affecting the United States, they show a picture of Bin Laden for 1/2 a second. Well guess what? Terrorism is one problem facing the US. It shouldn't be considered the #1 problem in the US (a la Guliani), but it is one. People who say the Bin Laden clip is fearmongering are just jumping on any reason to degrade Clinton.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+5careful, dude, don't mention giuliani in any discernibly negative way. bingobongonymaniac will stalk you and hunt you down!
        • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -5/+1So, Phil...where is your admission of stupidity? I don't see an Obama 15% win in Pennsylvania.
          • kfed2, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3Which account is this bingo? Has digg unbanned you from submitting under this one so you can stop submitting under bingobonqony for now.
            I didn't know you were a Rudy fan. I thought he was the same as Dick Cheney.
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -5/+1That is GREAT! You were too stupid to realize that soeone was impersonating me, so now you are trying to push it off as if it wAS me.

            Hate to tell you, but Digg doesn't unban. You really ARE just too stupid to have noticed that someone else has been impersonating me for months now, always coming up with a varation of my name. And he gets banned every time. You will also notice that he never changes his profile. It is always the same. And nothing like mine.
          • kfed2, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2Can you prove that you were not using those accounts? I believe your story has no evidence, and my guess that you were suspended form submitting under your normal account so you created a look a like is the most plausible scenario.
            Now you are too embarrased by your actions, so you have to create a mythical impersonator, and blame him.
          • kfed2, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3Sounds like a good scenario to me, but here is something for you. Those accounts were mine.
            I already succeeded in pushing those accounts off as you, so this may help you unfix it. If you really care as much as you come across as caring, feel free to show the link to this comment to anybody you want.
            I have a very important meeting tomorrow and I need to get back to sleeping. Feel free to reply, but I am getting very busy in real life and may not be getting back here for a while. I have a huge real estate deal a small company I am a partner in is about to close on about 1 hour south of Acapulco. I only get about 10% or so of the proceeds, but it is a 7 figure sale and the buyer is another developer, so their development will add quite a bit of value to the surrounding properties, which are ours!!! I happen to be really excited about it - maybe that is why I can't sleep.
            I have said this before - when you call someone stupid, you really need to get the spelling and Caps right.
            PS: On a scale of 1 to 10, how is digg customer service?
            No damage intended bingo - I don't think you will agree, but none of this is personal to me. I have nothing emotionally invested in my digg character. If you want an apology, here it is "I AM SORRY"
            Remember, it's just digg.
        • kfed2, on 04/23/2008, -0/+4Do you think bingo needed to spam the same pasted statement all over digg?
          http://digg.com/users/bingobongony/history/comment ...
          http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Bingobongony_Trolls_all_ ...
  • toshibu, on 04/22/2008, -4/+26So much for the end of the politics of fear...
    • CannedMango, on 04/22/2008, -3/+6Vote Obama ... he's the last candidate standing that can break the mold.
      • cygnus2112, on 04/22/2008, -5/+3http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0 ...

        WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said on Wednesday the United States must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan, adopting a tough tone after a chief rival accused him of naivete in foreign policy.

        Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.
        • StarlessKnight, on 04/22/2008, -1/+3Remember how we did exactly just that not that long after Obama said he'd be willing to? Are you saying if Osama were standing in the middle of a street, neon signs pointing at him, and the Pakistani government did nothing and, in fact, had been the ones to give him those neon signs (just to kick this extreme example up a notch) that our government would not even consider the possibility of going in there and take him down? Just the mere *possibility*?
          • cygnus2112, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1Pointless argument. I quoted an article where it showed Obama making threats and rattling sabres. Yet, Obama fans don't want to acknowledge it.

            I prefer Obama over Hillary, but politicians are cut from the same mold.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+2StarlessKnight, I can't find any example of where American forces incurred into, or conducted a bombin raid on Pakistani soil.

          I hate it when people who are afraid to accept a fact say "cite sources", but since I cannot find anything on my own, I have to ask, could you please cite your sources?
          • 47f0, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2American forces? - well, depends on what you call the CIA
            http://voanews.com/english/2008-03-27-voa69.cfm
          • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+24710, thank you!

            I am glad to see that we are not kowtowing to pakistan, and are going after al-qaeda.

            We were told, after all, that we will seek them out no matter where they are, and smoke them out of their holes.

            At least now, in Bush's twilight year of his terms, he's doing what is right, instead of what Cheney and Rumsfeld told him to do.

            Bush might just change my opinion of him, after all. As long as he does what is right, acts on his own judgement instead of what the neocons tell him to do. He can reconcile his first 7 years by doing what HE believes and acknowledging that he was fooled by the neocons in his first 6 years.

            This is his chance at reconcilliation with the American people.
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -3/+1So, Phil...where is your admission of stupidity? I don't see an Obama 15% win in Pennsylvania.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+4Not only that, but she's running on the platform that because she is part of the system that has created all of those messes (two wars, gas prices skyrocketing, an economy in crisis) she is best qualified to "fix" them.

      However, intelligent people see through that and understand that she wants to be in power to take advantage of all of those problems.

      Hello socialized medicine. Hello state mandated politically correct speech. Hello a completely disarmed citizenry. Hello double-speak. Hello to a socialist unitary executive and a collective peoples working as the village to raise the children.
    • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -7/+1Obama doesn't see reality like most hippies. Having a hippy as president would be the worst thing ever. And Obama has the worst case of hippie ive ever seen. Hippies won't save us from terrorists. Just ask Daniel Pearl.
      • Wartyboskfapped, on 04/22/2008, -2/+4Desperate Right Wing Shill is Desperate.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+4Oh *****, lukas smith, I really feel sorry for you. Not everyone that doesn't buy into your fear and destruction view of the world is a hippie. Some of us are just a little bit smarter than you. Some of us understand what makes America strong, and it is not caving in whenever a nutcase succeeds in blowing up a building or putting a video on the internet with empty threats. Some of us understand that no matter how many pissed off nutjob fanatics try to "destroy america" because they "hate us for our freedoms", we'll still be here, and so long as we don't change all of our laws and piss off all of our allies and the rest of the world, America will stand strong, and not piss its collective pants every time a brown person threatens us.

        Dude, stand up, be a man. Don't be afraid. We are Americans. Not hippies, not liberals, just Americans who didn't ***** our pants on 9/11.

        You are a coward hiding behind a war-mongering ideology in order to convince yourself that it is really those hippies and liberals who are the problem, so that you don't feel so afraid about those brown people.

        You should take an IQ test online. See which end of the bell curve you sit on. I'm guessing you fall somewhere in the middle or towards the left side.
      • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -6/+1You are hippies and liberal douchbags. Whats sad is American hippies are living in a fantasy where the American dream isn't built on the backs of dollar a day slave labor in Asia. I suppose if you were a hippie and you knew that you wouldnt be so willing to buy anything or pretend you are somehow morally superior. I mean there are people eating mud soup in Africa and you hippies are complaining about a war that your fearful democrat leaders signed up for initally but are recieving very little flak for now. THank you liberal media. Your IQ and convictions only convince me you are an idiot who lives in fantasy land like Obama. speaking of OBama I have more to say. Read below.
        • iainc, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1You don't know the poster's IQ, yet you write as if you do. What's with that?
        • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -3/+1I know. I conducted the IQ test. He failed.
          • iainc, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2No, man. YOU failed. You're always failing. I don't know why you even bother.
          • Eezyville, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1You conducted the IQ test and he failed? Results please.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+3iainc, he saw my comment, where I said that he should take an IQ test (and not making any conclusion, it was merely a suggestion) and being the O'Reilly parrot that he is, he decided this would be a good argument.

          Though I will concede, I can pretty easily determine whether someone is above 110 or below 110, or if they are particularly smart, above 130. But that is only because I'm not an ideologue but an intellectually honest person.

          Lukas Smith and Bingobongobong are shills, and they are not particularly good ones, at that.

          I helped set up UPI's newswire feed to General Dynamics at MacDill AFB (Centcom Headquarters), so I know what caliber of people we are dealing with in this "war against the blogosphere" commissioned by the Pentagon in a no-bid contract.
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -4/+1So, Phil...where is your admission of stupidity? I don't see an Obama 15% win in Pennsylvania.
          • PhilLesh69, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3get over it bingonongony.

            My guess was wrong. That doesn't make me stupid.

            Though, you are looking more and more stupid every time you post this stupid childlike taunt.
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -2/+1No...it DOEs make you stupid. Becuase you weren't making a "guess". You were making a guarantee. And do yo not see the importanace in that? If you could be SO far off in something that you claimed to be so sure of...then why the ***** should anyone take ANYTHING your say regarding politics seriously ever again? You prove to the world that you know absolutely nothing about politics. Even a 5 year old knew that Obama had ZERO chance today.
      • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -4/+2I also want you to read Obamas own words on the subject of Bush's guilt. Notice he doesnt use the words criminal or warlord or even that Bush is guilty of anything at this point. Or that proof exists of his guilt. In fact he sounds far more intelligent then the digg.com Obama fanatics who post crap day and night. If Obama doesnt think Bush is guilty right now why do you?
        "What I would want to do is to have my Justice Department and my Attorney General immediately review the information that's already there and to find out are there inquiries that need to be pursued. I can't prejudge that because we don't have access to all the material right now. I think that you are right, if crimes have been committed, they should be investigated. You're also right that I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of Republicans as a partisan witch hunt because I think we've got too many problems we've got to solve. So this is an area where I would want to exercise judgment -- I would want to find out directly from my Attorney General -- having pursued, having looked at what's out there right now -- are there possibilities of genuine crimes as opposed to really bad policies. And I think it's important-- one of the things we've got to figure out in our political culture generally is distinguishing betyween really dumb policies and policies that rise to the level of criminal activity. You know, I often get questions about impeachment at town hall meetings and I've said that is not something I think would be fruitful to pursue because I think that impeachment is something that should be reserved for exceptional circumstances. Now, if I found out that there were high officials who knowingly, consciously broke existing laws, engaged in coverups of those crimes with knowledge forefront, then I think a basic principle of our Constitution is nobody above the law -- and I think that's roughly how I would look at it." Obama.
        http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Barack ...
  • orangedude, on 04/22/2008, -4/+37There's a clip of Pearl Harbour in the same ad. Looks like the bitch was a neo-con in disguise all along. Wake up PA!
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+5Don't forget that she was a Goldwater Girl in 1964, an organized group of Republican candidate Barry Goldwater cheerleaders and campaigners.

      Also, don't forget that neocons are not republican, they are globalists from all parties. Many neocons were liberals when Hillary was a republican. They are all students of the late University of Chicago professor and Austrian, Leo Strauss.
    • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -8/+2Maybe she realized to reach out to the digg.com community she needed pics or they would think Pearl Harbor never happened. Wake up hippies. Bad people won't just go away if you hide from them or remain isolationist. Learn from Pearl Harbor.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+5Dude, you are the one hiding in fear of those big bad brown terrorists. And you are also obviously afraid of hippies.

        You have emotional issues. You should look into that.
      • LukasSmith, on 04/22/2008, -6/+1Afraid of hippies? ahahahahahahah. AAHHAAAHAHA AHAHAHHAH. Hold on a minute I think I'm having a heart attack.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -2/+4I feel sorry for you. You are too dumb to accomplish reading comprehension.

          Did you wash out of basic? Or did you even make it to basic training?
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -4/+1So, Phil...where is your admission of stupidity? I don't see an Obama 15% win in Pennsylvania.
          • PhilLesh69, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3bingobongony, I'm not stupid for thinking that obama could win by any margin.

            You are an idiot for glomming onto a statement where I say "that's my guess" and trying to parade around like you have accomplished some sort of personal victory by my guess being wrong.

            How old are you? 12???
          • bingobongony, on 04/23/2008, -4/+1No...really, you ARE stupid for thinking that. Becuase you were hte ONLY one ***** stupid enough to think that. Basically, in the face of all evidence, you sat there and said that 2+2=6.

            And now people are supposed to give a ***** about ANYTHING you say on politics? You showed everyone how little you know. This is why your life is worthless. But I suppose you are used that that feeling. How many times HAVE you dconsidered suicide in the last 6 months? 5?
  • BishkekBuddy, on 04/22/2008, -2/+44This "woman" has absolutely no shame whatsoever... I didn't think my opinion of her could get any lower - but it just has.
  • sharpfork, on 04/22/2008, -3/+21Video link from the article
    "And now, for the rebuttal, please welcome President William Jefferson Clinton:"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZW0m2nWB_M
    • michael532111, on 04/22/2008, -0/+11Hey everyone - please take a few moments and check out this clip. It is probably the best thing Bill Clinton ever said.
    • UtopiaInTheSky, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4That video makes me laugh everytime. Seriously, could it get any better? It's like they made that video for the sole purpose of biting themselves in the ass.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Just goes to show you. Both Clintons will use any argument, pander to any emotion and claim to be with any group at whatever moment that it might benefit them, then they will be against those very same things the moment it might benefit them.

      Hypocrites are even having a hard time with those statements.
      • Seldon2639, on 04/22/2008, -3/+1So, I suppose your claim is that Obama would never do the same? How about:

        To San Francisco donators:

        “It's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,"

        To Pennsylvania Voters:

        "contrary to what my poor word choices may have implied or my opponents may have suggested, I’ve never believed that these traditions or peoples' faith has anything to do with how much money they have."

        One of these things isn't like the other, one of these things isn't the same.

        Obama constantly (paraphrased):

        "We need hope, we need to believe, we don't need plans, we need abstract ideals. It's not all about hard substance. Words are enough. Ideas are enough"

        Obama after ABC Debate:

        "We can't focus on abstract ideas, we need to focus on hard substance"

        You can't run a campaign based on nebulous concepts (like hope, change, ect) and then complain when you're taken over the barrel about nebulous concepts (like patriotism, elitism, ect). Otherwise you really do sound like a hypocritical jerk. Either symbols matter (and they do), in which case Obama's symbols of hope, change, all of that, are applicable (which also makes criticism about symbols (like the flag pin, like Rev. Wright, like Michelle's lack of pride in being American until her husband ran for President). Or, none of it is, which makes Obama's campaign an exercise in pandering to begin with.

        It's all pandering, all politics. It's all populism. The fact that you agree with Obama's populism is no indication that his populism is inherently better.
        • MacEnvy, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2I don't think you understood what those quotes meant. Perhaps you should read them in context, and you'll realize that they actually go against what you assume they mean.

          The best thing about Obama is that 5-second clips of him speaking don't tell the whole story. You have to listen, to understand, to be able to string together multiple sentences to get the full meaning of what he's saying. That's also the worst thing about him, because this country is full of idiots who are unable to string multiple sentences together into one coherent thought, or understand the nuanced approach that is necessary in a good leader.

          Guess which group you're in, Seldon.
  • JlmAWP, on 04/22/2008, -6/+24Officially downgraded from bitch to *****. I hate that *****.
    • dBass, on 04/22/2008, -3/+1Ouch! The way things are going on this post, I just knew someone would bring out the nuclear weapons.
      • JlmAWP, on 04/22/2008, -0/+6Well, in my defense, there is no other word that captures her in all her different forms.
    • travis6690, on 04/22/2008, -2/+3Yeah, what a gosh-darned *****.
    • lhbaker, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1I thought Hillary was a bitch before I thought she was a *****.
    • unearth, on 04/22/2008, -1/+4Sexist comments like that are just as destructive as racist comments made about Obama.

      On the other hand, I have some serious cognitive dissonance here, because I still want to call her a *****. She just goes so far over the line so often.
      • cygnus2112, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4Will your raging political correctness make you spontaneously combust some day?
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3It is good that you at least recognize that cognitive dissonance exists, what it means and that you might be experiencing it right now.

        NOW, just be intellectually honest, and call her whatever you want. As long as you are calling her a derogatory term for cause, instead of to be racist or misogynist, it is okay.

        It is one thing to call a guy an ***** just because you don't like the way he looks, it's another thing to call a guy an ***** because he just ***** in your mess kit.
    • Eezyville, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1I actually like her more now. :)

      Thanks to her the democratic party is getting alot of coverage, we're hearing more and more from Obama, compared to her Obama looks great, she's attacking Obama constantly and making some serious issues like Rev. Wright surface now and become old news faster, and she's dragging the fight out for more democratic coverage. She's pretty useful. :)
  • N3tw0rk, on 04/22/2008, -2/+40If one candidate is trying to scare you, and the other one is trying to get you to think, If one candidate is appealing to your fears, while the other candidate is appealing to your hopes, then you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1You gotta give Bill Clinton credit. He's always been a very charismatic and convincing public speaker :)
    • Reaper2806, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3I'm on one hand thinking, "This is so disgusting, this can't possibly fool the voters." And on the other "Oh god, please don't let this work again..."
    • Seldon2639, on 04/22/2008, -1/+0That's a false dichotomy. It's not one candidate appealing to hope and thought, and one appealing to fear and, by your assumptions, more fear. It's one candidate appealing to hope and warm fuzzy feelings, and one appealing to cynicism and realism. I'm not going to claim that one form of populism is better, but neither candidate asks us to "think". Obama doesn't, his speeches are all about modes of non-thinking: hope, change, "yes we can". The buzzwords aren't used to evoke thoughtful deliberation, they're used to evoke an emotional response. The same is true of much of Clinton's campaign, it's based on emotion (a different set of emotions, I'll admit).
    • incredibilistic, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1I "think" Seldon2639" needs a hug. There, you just got some emotion and I thought about it before I did it. See, it works!

      The bad part is that this crap actually works on those that ARE NOT thinking and are simply voting out of pure fear.
    • letherial, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1IM thinking here, im thinking...bush, clinton, bush...wait, so the last 20 years have been off these same family lines and we are here now? its not like either one of they dynasty familys can claim sucess at this point and time. this is a bad pattern and it needs to be broken. Now ill tell you, every candiate has there "buzz words" and there way to manipulate voters, this is our political system, however, at least obama is showing a differnt direction then others have taken it. Sure this could all be a face, you take that chance with everyone but when looking in the context I see that clinton has more of a chance of being your typical fake politcion then obama does, obama speaks the truth even if we dont like it...i admire that in a person.

      i will be the first to admit that he may get the office and destroy the country, but at least its another name doing it.
  • kandiekizzes25, on 04/22/2008, -3/+13shame on hillary
  • flossdaily, on 04/22/2008, -3/+9That's it. If the nomination goes to Hillary I'm just going to vote third-party in the general election. I will not tolerate any more fear mongering.
    • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -9/+1OK.

      No one cares.
      • Wartyboskfapped, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4says bingo, caring enough to reply.
    • kreneskyp, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1i refuse to vote for nader he is partly responsible for the current state of the country. If hillary wins the nomination you're better off tearing up your ballot
  • peticsu, on 04/22/2008, -3/+4lol its kind of like in the Austin Powers movies where Dr. Evils base is on self-destruct mode...

    imagine a big island volcano with the face of Hillary
  • MindyB, on 04/22/2008, -3/+9Hillary Clinton has stooped so low that she has begun to turn droves of supporters off! She doesn't realize the damage she is causing, which is the saddest part, it shows how clearly out of touch with the American voter she really is. The is only focused on what she wants--to win--and does not care how she is hurting the Democratic party, the American people and the most likely Democratic Nominee. She makes me vomit! I will NEVER vote for someone so dirty as she has become.
    Pennsylvania, vote for Barack Obama on April 22nd.! I am a woman in Pennsylvania and am voting for Barack Obama.
    • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -8/+1Why the ***** do you think anyone cares who you are voting for? This is at least hte second time you have posted this EXACT same comment. As if you ***** matter.

      Hey everybody...this ***** Mindy is voting for someone! And she is asking us to do the same!
  • MindyB, on 04/22/2008, -1/+28Bill Clinton's Law of Politics: "If one candidate is trying to scare you, and the other one is trying to get you to think, If one candidate is appealing to your fears, while the other candidate is appealing to your hopes, then you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope." --Philadelphia, PA 2004
    • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -10/+1Obama isn't making anyone think. It is just Awwwwwk! Change! Awwwwwk! Change. Polly wanna cracker! Awwwwwwk!

      If I am going to vote for a black man asking for change, I will vote for the smelly man who sits outside my local supermarket. He's been asking for change for years.
    • BrendanSheehan, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1It's funny cause "you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope" is in itself fear-mongering.
  • brokenspatula, on 04/22/2008, -18/+2thanks for the laugh huffintonpost, i am laughing at you, not with you
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+8Wow. You must be so ideologically bound to Hillary that you are incapable of seeing the hypocrisy of her tactics.

      Too bad only northeast liberals in New York, Philadelphia and DC are as out of touch as she is. I'm guessing you are from one of those places, otherwise you just have an IQ below 110.
      • MacEnvy, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Um, Obama won the DC primary with 75.4% of the vote. And Hillary has been running here in NYS for the last 8 years, so she kind of had a head start and pre-built support network. An Philadelphia is expected to vote overwhelmingly for Obama.

        I agree with your basic point, but your examples are downright horrible.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2No they aren't. You misunderstand what northeast elite liberals are. They are not the electorate, they are elites, the people who think they rule over the electorate. Bankers, Journalists, Think Tanks and Politicians. DC and NYC are the epicenter of this group of people who believe they rule the world.
  • BananaGrabber, on 04/22/2008, -8/+5I agree. Hillary should stay in the kitchen where she belongs.
    • GhostyBoy, on 04/22/2008, -0/+6Hasn't she tried to feed us enough garbage already?
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1If by "kitchen" you mean politburo, I guess you're right.
  • CouchTomato, on 04/22/2008, -2/+3Kitchen sink is gettin clogged I guess.
  • GhostyBoy, on 04/22/2008, -1/+8Hey Hillary! Bin Laden is dead. Didn't you get the memo?

    Now let's get to the important issues like how do you intend to deal with Mussolini, or Stalin? Or Lex Luthor for that matter?
    • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -8/+1sources?

      The best part is, when you want to bash Bush, you will be the first one to say how Bin Laden is still at large.

      You are nothing but a little bitch. A bitch that everyone laughs at. And not JUST when they see you naked.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3Now I'm starting to think that you are a general dynamics employee based at MacDill.

        I don't think GhostyBoy said that bin laden was still at large because he wants to bash bush. Those are your words, but obviously you've been trolling digg long enough to generalize any of your "targets".

        Besides, "sources?" is a really ignorant rebuttal. If you can post a comment on digg, you can google any source your heart desires. Asking someone to cite sources is merely a stupid attempt at convincing yourself and your other parrotheads that the person is not speaking from some form of informed position.

        If you can't find the source yourself, you are too dumb to understand any of the sources he might cite.

        You do know that we are using these series of tubes here, right? You can use those series of tubes to find those sources, or to find a source that will insubstantiate his claims. Either you are dumb, lazy or overburdened by your job at MacDill, maybe they've given you too many blogs and comments to defend the neocon/pentagon story against. Ask your General Dynamics supervisor to lighten up on you. OR, use the UPI newsfeed I set up for you, to get more information. We were feeding you the Washington Times and UPI articles, last time I checked. Those generally support your employer's agenda. Use the feed, man.
      • 47f0, on 04/22/2008, -0/+5What's the matter, little bingobunghole - won't anybody play your silly troll-games with you?
      • keishax, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Sources-- Benazir Bhutto in an interview with the British version of Al Jazerra

        Benazir Bhutto: Bin Laden was murdered
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnychOXj9Tg

        Aired on 2nd November 2007,David Frost the presenter did not challenge her on her assertion (2:14) that Bin Laden was murdered, so maybe he was and the West has not announced it. Clinton is spinning the fear mongering that the Bush Administration has for the last 7 years. Funny, how just today there is a new tape of Osama Bin Laden. If you notice, any time the administration needs to create fear among Americans is to release the tape of Osama - always a tape and not a video.
  • lhbaker, on 04/22/2008, -1/+2Hillary is in self-destruct mode. If she loses the nomination, she becomes nothing more than an also-ran.
  • gdagreat, on 04/22/2008, -1/+5a vote for hillary is a vote for the devil.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+5A vote for Hillary in the primary is a vote for McCain in the general election.

      Sorry. It's just the truth.
  • kavery, on 04/22/2008, -1/+11For all that is holy, please end this Pennsylvania.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3They will. Don't worry.

      I lived in PA for a couple years when my father was a commander of an Army Depot. Pennsylvanians are the entire cross-section of America. Bankers, Businessmen, Farmers, Hunters, Factory workers (what's left of them after Bill's NAFTA signing), middle class, blue collar, white collar, religious, not-so religious, anti-religious, pro choice, pro life, pro gun, anti gun. PA has it all. And they aren't as dumb as some of the souther and mid western folks who rally behind whomever happens to be waving the flag this week.

      Even with the wishfull polling showing her with whatever sort of lead, be it a 20% lead, or only a 5% lead, Obama is going to carry Pennsylvania with a wide margin. Don't forget, like they always tell us when a candidate wins even though the polls said she wouldn't, "polls are an inexact science".

      Obama will crush her by at least a 15% margin. That's my guess.
      • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -5/+1OK...when the results come back tomorrow, PLEASE know that I will be following you around until you publicly adm9it how ***** stupid you were when you posted this.

        Seriously...do you think you know more about politics than EVERYBODY whose career is to know about it? Including Obama? You don't. You are not an expert on politics, or on anything.

        But again..I will bookmark this post, as well as your comment history. And every single post you post from now on, I will be on you like white on rice until you publicly accept your humiliation like a man. Of course, you won't. You will be a coward and hope that no one remembers your stupidity with this comment. But I will remember.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+5Wow. You've got me so scared that I am now typing this hiding behind my couch.

          Dude, I know about General Dynamics and their contract at Centcom, on MacDill AFB. I helped set up your newsfeed from UPI.

          Be on me like "white on rice". You can even be in my back pocket, if you like. You can dream up any other amazingly idiotic cliche term as your sad intellect allows. I'll be right there with you, dude.

          I'm glad you will remember. I hope you remember. Though I doubt you have the capacity to remember. All of your comments thus far have proven you are a parrot of the neocon agenda, and cannot think for yourself. All you can do is make angry comments and threats.

          I apologize to you if my tax dollars failed to give you a good enough public education. I thought that when I paid $1.675 million in taxes 5 years ago, that they would put that money directly towards at-risk youth. I guess I was wrong.
        • iainc, on 04/22/2008, -0/+5http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Bingobongony_Trolls_all_ ...
  • gdipak, on 04/22/2008, -4/+0gffgh
  • Codee, on 04/22/2008, -2/+3The only time Hillary is in the kitchen is to find stuff to throw at Obama.
  • iwillrefuse, on 04/22/2008, -1/+8More than anything, this latest ad just screams that her campaign staff is absolutely clueless. The kitchen jibe is cheesy at best, hypocritical at least; and you could place John McCain's mug at the end of the thing and we'd all be none the wiser. The whole thing has the illegitimate tone of one of those generic cut & paste "Have you been injured?" attorney commercials, and nearly all of the same disgust.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4Who do you think is her campaign staff?

      They are the litigious lawyers. This is their modus operandi.
  • RRJackson, on 04/22/2008, -10/+2Whatever it takes to win her the nomination is fine with me.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -1/+8So if she could win the nomination by murdering your family, that would be okay with you? Do you really love her that much?

      Oh, I'm sorry. You said that would be FINE with you. Fine is an acronym for ***** up, Insecure, Neurotic and Emotional. I suppose you really would be up for just about anything to get her the nomination.
      • RRJackson, on 04/22/2008, -4/+1Do another bong hit, Phil, and maybe you can come up with an acronym for "Logical Fallacy."
  • GDOG5, on 04/22/2008, -1/+2OH, THE IRONY!
  • Icupnimpn2, on 04/22/2008, -2/+2Aw, for a moment I thought that Leeroy Jenkins was doing political commentary. Then I saw that it was just ol' Jason Linkins.
  • zlotman, on 04/22/2008, -1/+9this kind of stuff ruined giuliani's campaign (thank god), and even though her ad wasn't all filled with explosions and death, this is still using the same tactics as giuliani. this can only hurt her campaign. i really believe fear mongering will not work on the american people anymore, and hopefully she will learn this the hard way
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+4Considering that she can't even figure out that what Obama said about "bitter" people, how she and the media couldn't understand that the people he was talking about actually stood up and said "Hell yeah I'm bitter!" when they heard him say that, considering she is a liberal intellectual elitist with no clue about what people making less than $50,000 a year think and feel, I don't think she'll learn, no matter how hard the hard way is.

      She will be running around Washington DC on the day of Obama's or McCain's inauguration screaming about how the American people just don't know how wrong they were, how she is the right person to help them, how stupid those ungrateful americans are for not voting for her.

      And she'll spend the next 4 or 8 years on talk shows, cable news channels and newspaper interviews trashing the American people and whoever becomes our president.

      She'll slash and burn our nation before she accepts that the people just didn't want her to lead them.
    • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -9/+1You are a ***** idiot. If Guiliani hadn't waited WAYYYY too long to care about hte race, he would have won easily. It had nothing to do with his campaign ads. It was his dumb strategy of putting all his eggs in a Super Tuesday basket, thus letting other build up momentum that he was never able to overcome.

      ASthis piece said...it worked for Hillary already. As in the LAST two primaries. And if you think it is going to backfire tomorrow, then turn in any semblance of your intelligence.
      • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+6Damn, dude. You should just not talk in public. It makes you look stupid.

        Giuliani's campaign failed as a direct result of his running solely and entirely on the platform of being the "9/11 mayor". There were skits and comedy sketches that ridiculed his sole reliance on 9/11 as his campaign policy.

        There were caricatures of Rudolph speeches, "I would be the best, 9/11, president, because, 9/11, I will protect the, 9/11, people from the terrorists, 9/11, and I will stop at nothing, 9/11, in order to, 9/11, make this the greatest, 9/11, nation, 9/11, on, 9/11, earth".

        Jon Stewart even gave his condition a psychological diagnosis: 9/11 tourettes.
        • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -5/+1No..you are the ***** idiot. If Guiliani had campaigned in New Hampshire, McCain would never have gained the momentum, and Guiliani would have taken Florida and the major Super Tuesday states.

          Remember...I will be following you around after Hillary wins PA tomorrow. So you better have some class and integrity and admit how ***** stupid you wre for sayingthat Obama was going to win by 15%. You will NOT be able to slink into the darkness like you always do in life.

          (Honestly...you saying that Obama was wrong when he admitted that he was definitely going to lose and then saying that I sound stupid is a classic. You are basically saying that you...a ***** nobody that NO ONE ON THIS PLANET WILL EVER CARE ABOUT, much less turn to for political (or any other kind) expertise know more about Obama's chances than HE does.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2I'm sorry, bingobongony, that you were abused as a child and washed out of Marine basic, but I can't ever slink into the darkness.

          I'm glad that you can determine what my expertise is.

          No, wait.

          I am glad that my employers, media executives and publishers, don't think like the dimwitted loser from the bayou or appalachia that you are.

          You have no basic understanding of politics, yet you are attempting to judge mine. You probably have no college education, or at best some backwater community college credits. You may have served in an armed service, but most likely received a less than honorable discharge.

          Sorry, dude. I've had lunch with William Westmoreland, in PA, before he died. I've been to West Point class reunions with my father where I've talked to Barry McCaffrey. My mother volunteered for Laura Bush in the First Lady's Correspondence Office. My father is friends with Tom Davis. I live about a block from Senator John Sununu.

          I am not a political neophyte like you. I live this *****. I work less than 100 yards from the White House. I deal with White House correspondents on a daily basis.

          Talk all the ***** you want, ass.
  • prefan21, on 04/22/2008, -1/+4For *****'s sake.
  • Jordan117, on 04/22/2008, -1/+6Well, seeing as Hillary went from inevitable establishment juggernaut to desperate backpeddler in just six months, with half the victories and a fraction of the money the "underdog" has, I'd say she's the one who can't take the heat...
  • zymyrgy, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Shocking, I tell you. That Hillary is using Osama bin Laden to scare up support. My mother has a phrase for this. I think it's "shameless hussy".
  • FairDinkumMate, on 04/22/2008, -0/+7http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZW0m2nWB_M

    Obama should just run this unedited as a campaign ad. It even has 7 seconds left at the end(of a 30 sec slot) for him to say "I'm Barack Obama & I endorse this message!"
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2Too bad they didn't have a team of young people dredging YouTube so that they could have found this clip far enough in advance to be able to spend a few hundred thousand or a million blasting that on every TV station in PA starting last night at the evening news, all the way through, every 15 minutes until the polls close.

      That would certainly have destroyed Hillary in every and all respects. She would be lucky to get 15% of the vote if they could have pulled that off.
  • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -10/+1so, the ***** at huffingtonpost are admitting Hillary's camp is being smart? Copying an effective ad strategy is something that smart campaigns do.
    • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+6Umm, yeah, but this "effective ad strategy" didn't do so well for Rudolph Giuliani.

      Smart campaigns don't adopt strategy from campaigns that have dropped out of the race after only a few primaries.
      • bingobongony, on 04/22/2008, -3/+1Again..you are a ***** idio, and will have ZERO credibility on Digg after Obama deosn't win by 15% tomorrow as you are guaranteeing. And I WILL follow your around so everyone knows you said that.
        • PhilLesh69, on 04/22/2008, -0/+3"Follow me around" all you want, *****. I never guaranteed *****. I said, "that is my guess", but considering that you are a moron, I guess there's no distinction between guessing and guaranteeing.

          Good Lord, dude. You need to take a bupropion or some other anti-anxiety drug. You are wound up wayyyyyy too tight.

          Though, from what I've learned, the people who attack you for words are usually too stupid to counter your argument. All they can do is attack like wild dogs with no understanding of what they are attacking.

          Are you just a wild dog with no intelligence? I guess your comments on this thread answers that question.
  • Craptacularama, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1http://downwithdoublethink.blogspot.com/2008/04/ep ...
  • Morghin, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2More FUD? Is that all experience in politics amounts to? FUD, FUD, and more FUD?
  • snotrokit, on 04/22/2008, -1/+2How can people still buy her *****? How? I really don't understand what the hell people see in this monster bitch. Today is your day Pennsylvania. Who do you want? Mrs. Bush or a chance to actually get out of this ***** that we are in.
    • hittnrun, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1Said the blind, koolade drinking, sh!t eating Obamabot.
  • Jtheletter, on 04/22/2008, -0/+1"worked in Ohio and Texas. Camp Hillary is hoping that the tactic will deliver a second time."
    So really she's hoping it'll deliver a THIRD time.

    Anyone using fear to manipulate your sentiments only wishes to control you. The difference is when fear is used from the White House it will have massive consequences for all of America, not just one state nomination.
  • DEIx15x8, on 04/22/2008, -3/+2I don't care what they contain just get adds. I'm tired of Obama buying this election. He has been airing two ads per commercial break the past couple days while Hilary aired one per hour. I've had to mute the TV every time his commercials came on because it has started feeling like harassment. I don't know why he feels he can spend tons of money on ads to buy my vote but it's been back firing, harassing me will not get my vote. Is it possible to sue for harassment over the TV? I hope he loses because this short time has been enough for me. I want him to leave my state tonight and never come back. I can't take another month of his harassment.
  • ATLien74, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1See, there are three kinds of people: Dicks, pussies and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along and dicks just wanna ***** all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes. And all the assholes want is to ***** all over everything. So pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while because pussies get ***** by dicks. But dicks also ***** assholes. And if they didn't ***** the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in *****.
  • EvilLordBanana, on 04/22/2008, -1/+2no, ***** you lukassmith, you to busy with bush's balls in your mouth and blinded by the sight of his taint to think straight? ***** hippies? What is this 1972? Do you really think it's all the hippie's fault? I think you have a very skewed definition of what a hippie is first off. Let me help you:
    Dictionary.com:
    "–noun
    a person, esp. of the late 1960s, who rejected established institutions and values and sought spontaneity, direct personal relations expressing love, and expanded consciousness, often expressed externally in the wearing of casual, folksy clothing and of beads, headbands, used garments, etc. "

    So first explain to me how hippies want to live off the backs of others dollars when they hardly used, or even wanted, in some situations, a bunch of money. The mostly make their own cloths and/or wear used clothing. How is that supporting out "asian slaves" as you put it?

    This is far from an endorsement for hippies by any means, I don't much care for them either, but I am however endorsing the doing away of speaking out of one's ass.

    But if you like broad sweeping generalizations I can do that too ya sister-***** gun worshiping redneck.
  • kushin, on 04/22/2008, -1/+1osama's pic was so not needed in the ad.
  • cheezeme, on 04/22/2008, -0/+2I bet it works. Obama is going to lose PA -- He's not been able to win a single big state. Really looks good for McCain come November
  • Judasmac, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1No fan of Clinton here, but that ad seems fair to me. I mean, if the Obama camp is going to flip out over a little thing like this, they help to make the point of the ad.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.