digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

Glenn Beck Omits Ron Paul's Name in Home-Page Poll

glennbeck.com — Scroll down, right side of page -- Ron Paul supporters, vote for Tom Tancredo and screw up Glenn's little poll.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • IheartRonnyP, on 12/12/2007, -11/+72Great idea! I voted for Tom and he's in second place! Ha!
    • 8secretlove, on 12/12/2007, -4/+43Now he's in first place.
      • sp0rk, on 12/12/2007, -4/+21I guess Glenn Beck isn't getting too many visitors to his site these days...It only takes two hours and 161 diggs to screw up his poll results that bad?
        • heypetray, on 12/12/2007, -3/+5No kidding, the damage doesn't have to stop here:

          Email Contacts:

          Glenn Beck | me@glennbeck.com
          This is the general contact for reaching Glenn Beck. Please note that Glenn gets hundreds of emails everyday and while he does read them he does not always have the opportunity to answer them all.
          • thumperings, on 12/13/2007, -0/+6i didnt even see the polll you guys are talking about, just " Previous Poll Topic: What percentage of the vote will Ron Paul receive in the Iowa GOP primary? "
        • Drahkar, on 12/12/2007, -2/+20Actually it looks like the poll is completely broken now and just gives a 500 error.
        • seks03, on 12/13/2007, -1/+22Looks like chicken ***** Beck changed the poll.
          • MacEnvy, on 12/13/2007, -0/+11And when you look at the last poll he's changed the question to "what chance does RP have of winning", and made Tom Tancredo's original high value the new 0-5% bracket. Devious and snarky, I don't quite know how to respond to that.
      • ivandir, on 12/12/2007, -1/+31Dude sometimes it makes me think that they avoid putting Ron Paul on the polls just to attract more viewers.
    • Frnnkdlxx, on 12/12/2007, -10/+39lol. We are such powerful assholes! DON'T GET ON THE WRONG SIDE OF DR. PAUL SUPPORTERS! The click is mightier than the yell.
      • PornStrz4Paul, on 12/13/2007, -3/+6yeah! Beck is so screwed. Now that his poll has Tancredo at the top---he will think everyone in his audience is for Tancredo! HA! This is so great. This is better than sex.
        • Frnnkdlxx, on 12/13/2007, -2/+7... I was wondering why you would say that, then I read your s/n
    • MadScientist420, on 12/12/2007, -5/+6It's a stupid idea becuase he could just ignore the idiots (us) voting for Tom and re-normalize the rest of the results. Better to vote for someone that would make the poll worthless like Huckabee, etc...
      • holiday, on 12/12/2007, -6/+12Glen Beck can ignore us all he wants... when it comes down to it we are the ones with the power, and with the power of the interwebs we are organized! Besides I think the real news is just how quickly intelligent surfers are able to identify and disrupt this sort of bias. VOTE DR. PAUL! ohh and go digg...
    • iviasterlambo, on 12/12/2007, -6/+7we just totally owned beck's poll. vote for tom
      • chaosium, on 12/13/2007, -3/+2Gaming a low-traffic webpoll is pissing into the ocean. Keep spending countless thousands of man-hours impressing yourselves and changing nothing.
    • thotpoizn, on 12/12/2007, -3/+44I'm not really a big Ron Paul supporter (I know, boo hiss, etc.) - but leaving him off the poll is kind of an "obvious troll" sort of *****. So, chalk up one more vote for Tancredo; fair play FTW.
      • AARTARTHUR, on 12/12/2007, -2/+6Thank You !! If you knew how much crap like this is thrown towards Ron Paul you might even vote for him.
        Anyway good guys 1 bad guys 0 thanks
        • thejokell, on 12/13/2007, -1/+6As a proud Ron Paul supporter I have to say, that is NO reason to vote for ANY politician. Just because he gets a bad rap?
        • CZzyzx41, on 12/13/2007, -1/+5There's a wide line between feeling bad for the guy and letting him run my country.

          If we just voted for people we felt sorry for, Elian and Corky would have been President years ago.
          • samdu, on 12/13/2007, -3/+3Couldn't have done any worse than the monkey in office now. ;)
      • breezytrees, on 12/13/2007, -1/+5HISSSSS BOOOOOOO HISSSS

        jk, thx, i'd do the same for kucinich too btw :-)
    • snapcase, on 12/12/2007, -1/+18Poll go boom?

      I just see a 500 Internal Server Error block on that section of the site.
    • OttawaMarcin, on 12/12/2007, -1/+19Poll? ***** YOU FRANK LUTZ!
    • SquigglyP, on 12/12/2007, -1/+9"The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
      Internal Server Error: /poll/Poll_It_SSI_v2.05.cgi
      This area is under construction. Please try again later. If this error still occurres please contact the server administrator"

      Someone can't spell "occurs"
    • jetboyterp, on 12/13/2007, -23/+4And you Paultards wonder why your man is left off of so many polls lately....
      • adventchild08, on 12/13/2007, -2/+7No we don't....we fully understand why....enjoy your bury
      • SquigglyP, on 12/13/2007, -1/+2removing someone from a poll because he would... WIN... IT... seems like a kinda stupid thing to do to me. That's just me.
    • themastersb, on 12/13/2007, -1/+14Now the poll is giving an error.... and speaking of polls..... ***** YOU FRANK!
    • imgstacke, on 12/13/2007, -1/+2If you want to do a bit more damage where it hurts (Advertising Dollars!) check out http://911blacklist.org
      They have a boycott campaign for Becks Advertisers - form letters to send them (customize it for his attack on Ron Paul supports - calling them terrorists).
      All of his advertisers are listed.
      • chaosium, on 12/13/2007, -2/+1Hahahahahaahaah do they really try to get people to market to the profitabe TRUTHER market? Those people believe Fluoride is a hypnotic drug, for chrissake.
        • fraterm, on 12/18/2007, -0/+1Sorry, I forgot how lucrative the cynical dismissive bigoted internet tough guy in his parent's basement market was. I hear you guys save alot of cash on t3h r3ntz that way, thus explaining your excuse of your favorite presidential candidates involving the middle east, since you don't see the direct impact of fuel prices on your allowance.
    • sotopheavy, on 12/13/2007, -2/+1I can't find the poll. did they take it down since it wasn't going their way?
    • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -7/+2Cowards for Ron Paul in 08 - Computer Douchebagery is greater than reality.
  • TypeEE, on 12/12/2007, -9/+63He is probably mad at Ron Paul not being in his shows
    • mal1964, on 12/12/2007, -1/+2Brilliant!
    • dracostimpy, on 12/13/2007, -0/+5Apparently, so is this guy:

      http://digg.com/politics/O_Reilly_One_ups_Beck_Exc ...
    • sotopheavy, on 12/13/2007, -1/+5He's selling bumper stickers that claim to protect your SUV from "hippies" keying your SUV.

      "Additional Product Information:
      Have you ever driven by a hippie, environmental protest and had your beautiful gas guzzling SUV keyed?

      Now you can protect your car by making it appear environmentally friendly with the Glenn Beck Hydro-Carbon Powered Eco-Vehicle bumper sticker. Look like a friend of the Earth while killing it at the same time!

      Hydro Carbon just means oil, but with our clever recycle-shape inspired design, environmentalists and global warming zombies alike will take one look and think you're on their side. Only we'll know the truth behind it…you evil conservative hate monger!"
      • breezytrees, on 12/13/2007, -0/+2I want a toyota prius with "ICARE" custom license plates.
  • compulsive1, on 12/12/2007, -11/+54Great idea. Dugg.
    • haiduz, on 12/12/2007, -17/+6Yea. Thanks for showing how Ron Paul spammers have the ability to target specific website, and screw up Polls. Now I will completely disgard all the bitching when a reputable website Pulls Down another rigged Ron Paul poll.

      I cant wait till the primary's are over and Ron Paul comes in 4th or 6th cause thankfully you cant rig peoples votes like you can rig these polls :)
      • AARTARTHUR, on 12/12/2007, -0/+5DieBold ???/
      • flameboy, on 12/12/2007, -1/+7"thankfully you cant rig peoples votes like you can rig these polls"

        That must have been the dumbest comment I've read all day.
        http://digg.com/politics/From_the_Programmer_s_Mou ...
        • haiduz, on 12/13/2007, -5/+3I think that has more to do with your own stupidity rather than what I said. However, when I say that ron paul "can rig these polls" what I mean is they hang out at ronpaulforums and constantly target websites that run ron paul articles but sending masses of poeple to vote on polls in websites they never visit, send out angry emails to editors who point out thier stupidity, and make stupid youtube videos, and upvote or digg social ron paul stories at networking sites. The way they rig online polls is they search for Ron Paul related stories and the invade online communities. While this strategy works online by creating an ilusion that Ron Paul supporters are wide spread, clearly it wont work in IOWA/ NH/ SC. While it is possible to rig the vote via voting machines, Ron Paul spammers obviously cant do because ALL they can really do is invade online communities with spam! (although some are tech savy enough to commit identity theft and illegally donate other poeple's money to his campaign).

          Now you can spout more Ron Paul bs in response, and I think it will be hilarious because all youre going to do is build yourself up to be more disappointed when Ron Paul loses the primary by a huge margin.
      • compulsive1, on 12/13/2007, -2/+2This is not about skewing polls- well actually it is, but not in the way you interpret it. This is about showing that obvious skewing of opinion polls, as in excluding a major candidate from even appearing on a poll will not go unnoticed. If they want to skew the results, they will not be able to obviously skew them in favor of their chosen candidate. Tancredo is running away with over 60% right now. The joke is on CNN and not on the gullible sheep that believe what they hear from them- when it comes to the presidential race at least.
    • mal1964, on 12/12/2007, -4/+2Thanks my five year old thought of it. he thinks next time we should hold our breath, isn't he a genius?
    • lifeisapickle, on 12/13/2007, -3/+3you people do know that glenn beck doesn't create his website or his polls or anything, right?

      RON PAUL 2008!!!
  • jabbertone, on 12/12/2007, -10/+53I voted for Tom.
    • Pillage, on 12/12/2007, -5/+7I voted for NADER!!
      • rspeed, on 12/12/2007, -2/+7"I'm voting for Dukakis"
        • heypetray, on 12/12/2007, -2/+3Will you still be working at the yarn barn? I hear that's a great place to raise kids.

          (I probably butchered it, sorry)
      • jebudas, on 12/13/2007, -2/+3Then you helped put Bush in office... thanks for nothing!
    • WTC7WasPulled, on 12/13/2007, -4/+6This just shows the power of the Ron Paul revolution. We have the ability from our sheer numbers to change any internet poll, not because we cheat but because we are huge! We are the majority and the last illusion the mainstream media is trying to maintain from their phony polls is that we are small. That illusion is slipping away.

      Ron Paul is takin the White House!
  • buckybadger9876, on 12/12/2007, -7/+31Jeez. What a loser. he's such a cry-baby. I can't vote for tom after what he did to ron paul in the debates.
    • sp0rk, on 12/12/2007, -5/+7Maybe I'm missing something, but what has Tom Tancredo done to Ron Paul in the debates? The only exchange I've seen between the two was extremely civilized on both sides.
      • skulljar, on 12/12/2007, -3/+3She's a witch! Burrrrrn 'er!
      • Funbox, on 12/12/2007, -3/+9It's that Tancredo has the least chance of winning out of all of them. Since Tancredo would've only had 1-2% of the votes tops, his name is now "representing" Ron Paul in the poll.
  • noxtwilight, on 12/12/2007, -9/+63God I am never going to that website again .. ouch!

    oh voted for Tom too ;)
  • bioncinola, on 12/12/2007, -7/+26oh rats i voted duncan hunter LOL
  • buckybadger9876, on 12/12/2007, -9/+100GLENN CAN BE CONTACTED AT me@glennbeck.com so you can let him know how you feel:
    look, i know you're pissed that Ron Paul cancelled once. But it was WOLF BLITZER. Honestly.. when a candidate who gets SO LITTLE MSM coverage gets asked to be on your show or the situation room, which do you think he should choose? Leaving him off your poll is childish and isn't doing your job as a journalist.
    Please get over it!
    • MikeFallopian, on 12/12/2007, -1/+24Glenn Beck isn't a journalist, he's an entertainer like Olbermann and O'Reilly.
    • iviasterlambo, on 12/12/2007, -5/+22me@glennbeck.com? what a narcissist
    • JaredXM, on 12/12/2007, -1/+5He never responded to my email.
  • XxtraLarGe, on 12/12/2007, -8/+72Tom is now in FIRST PLACE!
  • juankovo, on 12/12/2007, -6/+22It might be a good idea to visit the URL directly (type in glennbeck dot com) instead of clicking on the link above, or he'll just filter out all the votes coming from digg. That, and "?NEOCONSERVATIVE_SHILLBOY" in the URL doesn't help matters either. :)
    • haiduz, on 12/12/2007, -9/+3Great Ideas for showing ron paul spammers how to rig online polls undetected!
      • Schneckehaus, on 12/14/2007, -0/+1Are you dumb?
        He explained how to not get the results rigged, not how to rig them.
    • cracker42, on 12/13/2007, -1/+6Are you kidding? I dugg this link just for ?NEOCONSERVATIVE_SHILLBOY
    • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -3/+2Maybe you guys can use this little trick in the real election. Maybe then Ron Paul will actually show up on the polls.
  • JiveDadson, on 12/12/2007, -4/+39Tom T has taken the lead. Go Tom! (Whoever you are.)
    • Frnnkdlxx, on 12/12/2007, -2/+7I voted for Tom Paulcredo... I mean Ron Tanpaul.... i mean.... whatever.... I don't even know the airbag
  • IheartRonnyP, on 12/12/2007, -13/+27That didn't take long at all! Keep it up people! Ron Paul is going to surprise the heck of those losers when he WINS this election! How much do you wanna bet we'll hear a bunch of whining and a demanded recount. Ughhh annoying.
    • lucciinthesky, on 12/12/2007, -7/+6no, that's what's going to happens when he gets the ***** rocked out of him in the primaries
      • skulljar, on 12/12/2007, -4/+4Well I'm voting for him, but he's got a long way to go. First the Primaries, then the Presidency, then the Electoral College, then the Supreme Court, then the International Bankers, then the people who can't have their mocha everyday anymore when he starts cutting spending. Long hard road.
        • AARTARTHUR, on 12/12/2007, -2/+3nice post
        • Wetzilla, on 12/13/2007, -3/+3I don't understand the people who think the "corporate entities" are afraid of Ron Paul. I can almost guarantee that they would be incredibly giddy if he actually did get elected, because he would remove all government interference with business, and allow the corporations to run amuck. You think what we have now is bad? What do you think will happen when there are no restrictions at all?
          • djnitro, on 12/13/2007, -1/+3Good ol' fashioned free-market capitalism, comrade. If a company clubs baby seals, only people that like baby seal clubbers will buy it. Those that don't, won't. Similarly, if it comes out that company X is a heavy polluter, then we vote with our wallets and they'll either thrive, or not. IMO, letting the market decide what is "right" is the best way to do it.
          • chaosium, on 12/13/2007, -2/+1"we vote with our wallets "

            Libertarians are stupid.
    • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -3/+2Ron Paul won't even make it to the election. Is it just me or is this the John Kerry camp all over again.
  • ivandir, on 12/12/2007, -13/+43What a piece of ***** Glenn Beck is. I say we kick him in the nuts, just where it hurts the most. Vote for Tom Tancredo.
  • Webrunner53, on 12/12/2007, -6/+16Voted for TT
  • axiomnow, on 12/12/2007, -6/+8I voted for Tom.
  • jeffiek, on 12/12/2007, -7/+25Tom now in the lead with 35.7%

    I can't wait for Beck's reaction.
    • Swordman554, on 12/13/2007, -1/+2His reaction: it is no longer that poll. It now reads: "Have you decided who your favorite candidate is?"
  • pedrovoltaire, on 12/12/2007, -31/+4now start voting for thompson
  • rasbradley, on 12/12/2007, -13/+22Yep. We need to send mass emails once again to CNN. And what a lame debate. (Once again.) The Old Press is dead. Here's to the New Republic!! Ron Paul 2008!
    • dshPls, on 12/12/2007, -10/+14Then stop spamming the "old press" for ***** sake. How stupid can you possibly be? To write-off CNN, then beg for them to give time to your candidate.
      • rasbradley, on 12/12/2007, -5/+4Pardon me but I have not written off CNN personally. You think because of who I support that I think like you or anyone else? Think again! I am my own person. Many people from conservitives to demacrats and independents alike love Ron Paul. Oh and not to mention all the people who have been woke up from their apathy. Your use of "spamming" is lame as well.
      • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -2/+2What you type on Digg makes you look like a ***** fool so take that into account next time you post.

        You're your own person - and that person is an idiot.
        • rasbradley, on 12/13/2007, -0/+1You are correct in that posting comments anywhere can make one come across as foolish. I for one welcome this. I want to become better at sharing thoughts and ideas. If someone takes it upon themselves to point that out to me fine. I welcome improvement. Here's what I would change in my first comment: I would stress that if we as citizens, consumer, PEOPLE, want change we should go about it in a respectful manner. Sending our government a letter or anyone in the media a concern via email or by phone is not only acceptable it is important to let them know how we feel. My opinion and ego came shining through without any real point. I would also refrain from using not so colorful adjetives as well. Thank you MeatBiProduct for your comment to mine. Really.
        • Schneckehaus, on 12/14/2007, -0/+1It's hard to take the illiterate or lazy very seriously.
          Use spellcheck, properly format your comments, take some time to consider how your laziness/stupidity affects the views of the people who read your comments, then maybe people will take you seriously (or as seriously as one can on the internet).
  • SeanSutherland1, on 12/12/2007, -5/+8hahaha. nice
  • compulsive1, on 12/12/2007, -9/+15TT is closing on 40% of the vote. This is surely going to make waves in the republican circles.
    • Scienceisfun, on 12/12/2007, -1/+11I think you strongly overestimate Glenn Beck's influence.
    • tightscrummy, on 12/13/2007, -0/+3The revolution is at hand! Hurry, go dig up the bag of gold coins you buried in the backyard!
      • chaosium, on 12/13/2007, -0/+1HOW MANY TOOTHBRUSHES DO YOU THNIK CAN I TRADE THEM FOR
        • tightscrummy, on 12/13/2007, -0/+2Ron Paul is going to solve the dental care problem with the invisible hand of Adam Smith, you won't need toothbrushes anymore.
    • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -1/+3Did you hear about the latest Glenn Beck internet poll turnout? A bunch of asshats spam voted for a candidate - then talked about it on a major social news site! Those republicans are bound to have their panties in a knot over this!!
  • OKeric, on 05/12/2008, -7/+8Alright, well I emailed Glenn. Will let you all know if I get a reply.
  • amistybleu, on 12/12/2007, -10/+19Glenn Beck is currently being ass ***** by MSM and has no comment.
  • vault, on 12/12/2007, -13/+34What on earth was the point of this?
  • gonegoogling, on 12/12/2007, -10/+53i voted for Ron Paul by clicking on Tom Tancredo
  • ssn697, on 12/12/2007, -20/+33Nice herd mentality. Yep, a lot of think for yourself people on the RP bandwagon.

    As for the important stuff: My first, and last visit to Glenn Beck's website. WhoTF designed that awful piece of *****?
    • werkerb33, on 12/12/2007, -0/+18Agreed. Design looks like a cross between a sports betting site and one that serves up midget porn.

      Toss that one around in your head for a minute and you'll see the possible bling roll in...
      • ssn697, on 12/12/2007, -1/+2Cha ching! Despite the visual I got, thinking about betting on midget porn "Olympics", the obvious money making opportunity is too good to pass up! Just the "midget pole toss" idea alone is pure gold.

        Funny post dude. I appreciate the afternoon chuckle.
        • NathanHaleFTW, on 12/12/2007, -6/+5"Nice herd mentality" I agree. People who worked together are stupid. People who join together to fight a cause are totally herd mentality. Lolz like those stupid founding fathers who banded together to fight tyranny... major lawlz.
        • ssn697, on 12/12/2007, -6/+6yeah, spamming a lame website is equal to founding a country.

          Can you RP'ers get ANY more lame? Doubtful, but you just keep trying!
          • opt4freedom, on 12/13/2007, -5/+2Actually, it is. It's people taking action anyway they can to fight against the gross inequities going on in the mainstream media.
            And it's not spamming. There are a lot of supporters for Ron Paul and online polls (if worth a crap) don't allow multiple submissions from the same IP address.
            Wait until we "spam" the voting booths! LOL! I think that's what you're really afraid of.
          • ssn697, on 12/13/2007, -2/+4You are REALLY going to compare founding a country to throwing a hissy over an online poll?

            Ladies and Gents, the Ron Paul supporters!!!!
          • onetimer, on 12/13/2007, -2/+4These paul supporter's hubris goes beyond anything you can imagine ssn. I had one ronbot a while back equating donating to pauls campaign to donating to cancer research. He said they were both "worthy causes"
          • MeatBiProduct, on 12/13/2007, -1/+1You take yourselves and the ***** you do on the internet way to serious.
          • Sidonas, on 12/13/2007, -0/+1I believe this country, and perhaps certain individuals in it, need to realize that waving a gun around a firing off shots is not the only way to produce change. He who has the biggest gun is no longer the ruling influence in the world. Swaying an online poll may be a very minimal way of displaying that, but it is a display nonetheless.
          • MeatBiProduct, on 12/14/2007, -0/+1Better hit those booths early cause you won't be voting on him in November.
    • bonedead, on 12/13/2007, -1/+1Nuclearcow
  • sahaqiel, on 12/12/2007, -6/+18Go TT, 40% already. ah, the power of the tubes :-)
  • ajpalmieri, on 12/12/2007, -8/+12lol, i love u guys.
  • sbassin, on 12/12/2007, -5/+11Better yet, don't go to this clown's web site at all.
  • dzvette53, on 12/12/2007, -5/+15Tancredo running up the poll!! Any minute now he will double any other candidate. Good work diggers... that dumbass better realize what caused this "unexpected" outcome.
  • dirka, on 12/12/2007, -4/+24Best Idea I have heard!! I can't stop laughing

    TT 43.5% now
  • shadow54682, on 12/12/2007, -7/+6TT's up to 43.5% now
  • insomniac8400, on 12/12/2007, -5/+28What a dumbass Tom Tancredo is getting all of Ron Paul's votes. His sad attempt at a biased poll has failed.
  • fishwhistle, on 12/12/2007, -4/+11done
  • diggerydood, on 12/12/2007, -4/+14That was fun. Thanks!
  • brainboy77, on 12/12/2007, -13/+1tom tancredo? a little background story please?
  • 01l0, on 12/12/2007, -6/+24did you guys ever stop to think that this might be a stealth-post by a Tancredo supporter?
  • NightVortez, on 12/12/2007, -5/+16Tom Tencredo: Hope for America?
  • patpl22391, on 12/12/2007, -25/+6I voted for Mitt Romney.
  • bcromwell, on 12/12/2007, -4/+14That was fun, 45% for Tom! I mean Ron ;)
  • wedges, on 12/12/2007, -33/+15jesus enough with the ron paul *****.
  • justodd, on 12/12/2007, -4/+14Voted for TT. He's way in the lead now. Behold the power of Digg to screw up a poll. :)
    • ivandir, on 12/12/2007, -6/+2A poll that is not balanced and fair.
    • TJ11240, on 12/13/2007, -2/+6Behold the power of Digg to screw up an ELECTION. :)
    • Psi57, on 12/13/2007, -0/+1They can just clear the Diebolds' cache :D
      Oh wait, that calls for a :(((
  • HypocriteDigg, on 12/12/2007, -5/+45Who the hell is Glenn Beck?
    • iviasterlambo, on 12/12/2007, -3/+17an *****
      • LOCK3D, on 12/12/2007, -2/+8A childish neocon talking head with delusions of grandeur. O'Reilly junior.
    • zblackjack, on 12/12/2007, -1/+8nobody anyone will remember
    • cambob76, on 12/13/2007, -0/+2CNN's Bill O'Reilly, i.e., stupid douchebag.
  • werkerb33, on 12/12/2007, -3/+6Tancredo FTW!

    He's currently #1 with over 42%.
  • letdowntourist, on 12/12/2007, -4/+22From Beck's site:
    "Previous Poll Topic: What percentage of the vote will Ron Paul receive in the Iowa GOP primary?
    0-5% (45.5%)
    05-10% (20.7%)
    11-25% (14.7%)
    26-50% (7.8%)
    More than 71% (7%)
    51-70% (4.2%)"
    • CourtesyFlush, on 12/12/2007, -39/+9I see this one wasn't purposely skewed by the loyal Paulites.

      This whole thread is a perfect example of their shenanigans.
      • CourtesyFlush, on 12/12/2007, -29/+5I see this poll wasn't purposely skewed by loyal Paulites.

        This whole thread is a perfect example of their shenanigans.
    • CourtesyFlush, on 12/12/2007, -28/+2Gotta love Digg's comment section.

      It's there, then it isn't.


      • av4rice, on 12/12/2007, -3/+9How about you make a fourth post about it?
        • CourtesyFlush, on 12/12/2007, -24/+2How about you suck my binghole, little Paulite?
    • Christerray, on 12/12/2007, -19/+3And the Revolution dies :[
    • jayathecat, on 12/12/2007, -1/+9This poll actually isnt all that bad. It's saying that 54.5% of people feel he has more real support than the polls are reporting. (Generally less than 5%)
  • solarsavior, on 12/12/2007, -4/+9Done. Tom is in the lead. Go Tom go!
  • mindwarp, on 12/12/2007, -4/+1149.4% for Tancredo and rising lol
  • Quicksilver4648, on 12/12/2007, -5/+13LOL! Tom is winning with 49% of votes.
  • digger4, on 12/12/2007, -6/+29Ron Paul was there earlier and winning- he probably took him out because out that. But I will vote for Tom just to screw over his stupid baised poll
    • patpl22391, on 12/13/2007, -0/+8quit making stuff up.
    • PornStrz4Paul, on 12/13/2007, -0/+1So true--why would they take the leader of the poll off of there? I mean, RP is dominating national polls so it should be no surprise when RP is leading a crappy radio disc jockeys poll...you know what I mean? It's going to be so funny when RP wins and they realized that they didn't believe the poll numbers...bastards.
  • jisrael, on 12/12/2007, -4/+13done - TT was in first with almost 50% and in a distant second was Mit with around 20%
  • mattyx, on 12/12/2007, -9/+88Glen Beck is a douchebag.
    • jtq1, on 12/12/2007, -4/+24Keep in mind that Glenn Beck was always a douchebag.
      • garyadams, on 12/13/2007, -1/+5Glenn Beck aspires to be a douche bag.
    • elliotys, on 12/13/2007, -2/+8Does he really make vagina's smell good? But seriously ***** Glenn Beck. If I saw him in person I would slap him like a ho, and say "bitch, give me my money!!"
      • chaosium, on 12/14/2007, -1/+1"Does he really make vagina's smell good?"

        He certainly makes vaginas angry over the internet.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 211 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.