Digg - California First Lady Maria Shriver Endorses Obama

147 Comments
Who Dugg It?

nosecohn, on 02/04/2008, -22/+12I wouldn't want to be in the governor's mansion tonight.
- plinstrot, on 02/04/2008, -3/+19I would.
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, on 02/04/2008, -13/+5yar their angry sex will be loud
  
  "IMMA CUM, YOU IDIOT"
  - mrASSMAN, on 02/04/2008, -4/+3I swear you can't make a single mature/intelligent comment. I support the same candidate as you but I can't help but bury every comment you make.
  - gak001, on 02/04/2008, -3/+2Classless.
- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -0/+6I was under the impression that Shriver was always a Democrat. I don't see how this hurts McCain either so I doubt Arnold will use be angry and use his popo as a weapon.
  
  Funny afterthought; I wonder if Arnold yells out 'Sarah Conner' during sex.
  - copaceticZ, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1Yea she's an Aging democrat who has been ***** a Republican for 20 years.....and people will listen to her because she is a "kennedy" ***** the kennedy's and ***** obama he will never win we will get another republican president and all of you morons will all cry and whine like bitches when it happens while i secretly promote obama to all of my friends so i can set them up for defeat!
- copaceticZ, on 02/04/2008, -3/+1obviously this is a calculated effort by the republicans to endorse obama whom they know they can easily beat........
magdalen68, on 02/04/2008, -10/+91She's her own woman; and I'm sure her husband respects that about her.

THANK YOU MARIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- bremstrong, on 02/04/2008, -3/+22Speaking of women, this interview with Michelle Obama was buried earlier. Digg is great but is open to abuse, like when an interesting interview like this is buried:
  
  http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Obama_s_Secr ...
  
  What possible reason would there be to bury this besides being a Clinton supporter? Was the same interview already posted earlier?
  - Pake, on 02/04/2008, -3/+9Clinton or Paul supporter. Both notorious for burying everything related to Obama.
    - Rickler, on 02/04/2008, -5/+3Not even close to the number of articles buried with ron paul in the title. Here's an article with 2000+ diggs and it never made it to the front page http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Has_Fox_News_Exc ...
      - Pake, on 02/04/2008, -2/+4Front page is based on quickness of diggs, not quantity. Also, it used to be article after article after article of Ron Paul spam for months, with Obama MAYBE getting an article once a week. Can't help it if the Digg community is tired of the members of Ron Paul's forum using a spam tactic where they post the link to an article on digg and everyone on the forum diggs it up, conveniently bypassing the way Digg is intended to work.
      - Pake, on 02/04/2008, -2/+5And when I say "bypassing the way Digg is intended to work", I mean exploiting the system. The tactics the RP forum uses would manage to get an ad for "Male Enhancement" products up on the front page. Would you be happy if a company like Microsoft had it's employees digg everything that is related to Microsoft up, while also digging down all competitor products?
      - Rickler, on 02/04/2008, -3/+1Pake, your first comment makes some sense but your second doesn't.
        
        I was there when it was being dugg. The story was less than 30 mins submission time and over 300 diggs when it was buried out of upcoming and into oblivion. Once a story is buried out of upcoming it has no chance of front page status.
        
        Obama getting an article once a week? I see three Obama stories on the front page right now; Ron Paul zero. Who're the spammers now?
      - poxonyou, on 02/04/2008, -0/+4Rickler: He said "for months," as in the past. There's also a difference between a widely popular candidate making front page when he's receiving major news and endorsements, during a very popular Democratic primary race, and a candidate who was polling less than 10% dominating the page all day, everyday, about every little minor thing imaginable.
    - xenuxenuts, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2Yeah, but Obama isn't fighting just to get into debates. RP's pretty good for a republican, but he never stood much of a chance. The republicans are the big govt party now.
  - iainc, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2Sour grapes and some very bad apples.
- Chompy, on 02/04/2008, -3/+13I gotta say, my respect level for the Schwarzeneggers has gone up a few notches, mainly because they aren't presenting a "united front" or any of that nonsense. Obviously they each believe in who they're endorsing; if they didn't, then they'd both be behind one candidate. It strikes me as much more honest.
- LukasSmith, on 02/04/2008, -9/+7Is maria legal?
- rz8472, on 02/04/2008, -7/+8Maria is sleeping on the couch tonight.
  - Retnuh730, on 02/04/2008, -7/+5Maria is sleeping with a black eye tonight.
    - estacado, on 02/04/2008, -5/+4Once you black, you never go back.
- KamikazeeDriver, on 02/04/2008, -9/+1I'd hit it, unless she helps out industry
  http://buttrape.myminicity.com/ind/
- KamikazeeDriver, on 02/04/2008, -9/+1If she'll support industry, then I don't care what she does. That's what this country is losing too rapidly. Can't defend ourselves with an industry to build our shields.
  
  http://buttrape.myminicity.com/ind
- inverselogic, on 02/04/2008, -2/+0Its funny because everyone loves taking cracks at Arnold, but how long has he been married to her?
augenblick2007, on 02/04/2008, -17/+26Finally common sense. I hope people of US will not miss their last chance to change the way politics are done in US.
- LukasSmith, on 02/04/2008, -13/+2wtf is maria shriver?
Tex, on 07/28/2008, -6/+83This'll be in every single California newspaper tomorrow morning, perfect timing for Super Tuesday.
- zephyr42, on 02/04/2008, -0/+7I'm no democrat or republican but looking at both parties, I think there's a larger majority within the democratic party that wants nothing more than to stop Hilary from being president.
  - bitspace, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1That's debatable. Until just today California was widely expected to go very strongly in favor of Clinton. Now, if you believe the polls (and who should?) they're basically tied.
    Clinton has a lot of support and influence, and still leads with delegates (counting committed superdelegates) as well as in national polls. New York is practically a foregone conclusion in favor of Clinton as well.
    - mrASSMAN, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1Her margin of victory in California has decreased from 12% 2 weeks ago to -1% today (meaning Obama has a 1% 'lead' now)
  - poxonyou, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Huh? I'd say there are people who believe strongly in their candidates at the moment, but will reconsider when the nominee is picked. It happened with Kucinich, and recently with Edwards. People sometimes get dramatic when the candidate they lent their support to still has a chance. Most Democrats would get behind any candidate that wasn't a full fledged Republican, or Lieberman. Right-leaning independents and Republicans on the other hand, have almost no reason to vote for Hillary and many hate her and hated Clinton.
- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -1/+1It's now or never for John Edwards too. I sincerely hope that he was saving his endorsement for tomorrow (Monday) in order to make headlines right before Super Tuesday. If he does it'll be awesome; John Edwards, Maria Shriver, and the LA Times all in one day (being reported on).
PeoplesChoice, on 02/04/2008, -8/+26NOW, THAT'S-WHAT-I-CALL-NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The way you'll notice that this is scaring the Clintons to *****, is when the attacks start coming. The lovely smiles at the LA debate suddenly disappears. Let's wait and see.
- mrASSMAN, on 02/04/2008, -2/+2Uh oh, here comes another tantrum attack..
rangermatt, on 02/04/2008, -11/+15Now after Gore, Edwards, and Bill Richardson endorse, Obama will REALLY be set!
- soot, on 02/04/2008, -3/+5If Gore, Edwards and Richardson get over their hit-and-miss fears and speak out now when it counts the most, anyway.
mishmish48, on 02/04/2008, -21/+3Can someone explain to me what she might see in her husband?
- estacado, on 02/04/2008, -6/+5He can balance his checkbook.
- SheilaNoya, on 02/04/2008, -0/+8For starters, the billions of $$$ in Santa Monica real estate he owns. But hey, at least she's endorsing Obama, so she gets some bonus points.
- Tiak, on 02/04/2008, -0/+4... The most common criticism from anti-Obama people is that people vote for him because he's "Young, charismatic, and sexy"... You might start there...
- mrASSMAN, on 02/04/2008, -2/+2Well, he has pretty large biceps.
Shuk, on 02/04/2008, -15/+5Obama's got a fever, and the only prescription he needs is more endorsements!
jake07, on 02/04/2008, -19/+7Remember True Lies and how Arnold thought Jamie Lee Curtis was cheating on him, so he scares the ***** out of that one guy, and then Jamie Lee does a strip tease for Arnold, but she doesn't know it's Arnold and she's got these great pair of *****? Kinda makes you wonder who Jamie Lee Curtis is endorsing, doesn't it?
- Alix7, on 02/04/2008, -7/+3Jamie Lee Curtis also has a *****, so she's probably endorsing Hilary.
Alix7, on 02/04/2008, -41/+2WHAT THE *****?

Nice to see this raggedy bitch going back to her roots.
Qtip42, on 02/04/2008, -21/+14ENDORSEMENT THREAD = bandwagon voters

You guys would do a better job if you educated the undecided voters about what issues obama stands for....then again if you did that, they'd probably switch sides.
- monkeyrun, on 02/04/2008, -5/+4Obama's says he will bring democrats and republican together, but how? Only God knows.
  
  Republicans are not going to just say yes to every issues he propose, and there will be compromises
  
  With each compromise we are drifting further and further from the Obama promise land.
  - Pake, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2It's a lot easier to make little changes that add up than to make sweeping changes. Not to mention, with small changes, you can prevent negative outcomes much easier than with large changes. Unless you have one party controlling it all, it is impossible to work without compromise and the only thing not compromising would do is create four years of deadlock.
MBX1, on 02/04/2008, -20/+3Too bad her husband is a prick.
- MBX1, on 02/04/2008, -9/+2Well, who-ever just dugg me down must be a McCain supporter, cause that's who Arnold wants to endorse most likely.
  - jamesov89, on 02/04/2008, -6/+2No WE dugg you down because you offer nothing constructive or funny. I support Obama btw.
- TheWorm, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2Do you hate Arnold because he is a Republican or do you have any actual reasons? I really don't think Arnold is half bad, both as a person and a politician, and I'm not even conservative.
  - MBX1, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Yes i don't like Arnold this is why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYC5uITFRoo
Scheissen, on 02/04/2008, -23/+13Keep these second rate endorsements on your Obama forums. Until then, buried for more obamaspam.
- Pake, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1Hey look! I found a Ron Paul supporter! I bet you bitch about people censoring RP, don't you?
- br0ck, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2Where exactly are these pro-Obama forums anyway?
estacado, on 02/04/2008, -6/+19You guys should see her speech too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62_ajoKkuHA
She's actually a very good speaker, given the fact it was all spontaneous. I bet she writes most of Arnold's speeches.
obamarama, on 02/04/2008, -18/+8Wheeeeeeeeeeeee! Can't get enough Ospama!
mooseontheloose, on 02/04/2008, -23/+8I love how the wife of every meaningless politician has come out for Obama as we should give a *****. It should also clue anyone paying even the slightest bit of attention that they're doing it because it's the cool hip thing to do among socialite trophy wives
- xenuxenuts, on 02/04/2008, -0/+5I wouldn't exactly call her a trophy wife.
HanSolo69, on 02/04/2008, -20/+3ooohh, somebody's gonna get a knuckle sammich when she gets home. remember this when she appears on the next talk show explaining how she "fell down the stairs."

Man, domestic violence jokes are awesome. Don't you guys agree?
- estacado, on 02/04/2008, -1/+3Good thing is that there are no wifebeaters big enough to fit Arnold. So he might have to think of something else.
phantasyhero, on 02/04/2008, -21/+6Who the ***** cares?

Endorsements only matter if they're huge, else voters simply don't give a *****. Buried.
GeorgeWKush, on 02/04/2008, -24/+6Screw Obama, I wanna know who is endorsing Ron Paul. - But seriously, enough with the Obama endorsement spamming.
BannedTwice, on 02/04/2008, -60/+2Endorsing a muslim terrorist. ***** sad.
- TwwIX, on 02/04/2008, -3/+16"Abouttobebannedagain" would've been a more proper name for you.
  - ryan83189, on 02/04/2008, -2/+7BannedThrice?
- mrASSMAN, on 02/04/2008, -1/+9It's hard to believe, but there really are people as stupid as this going to the voting booth Tuesday.
- xenuxenuts, on 02/04/2008, -1/+6still wishing you finished high school?
blitzer, on 02/04/2008, -19/+7This is what it has come to.. j-grade celebrities making the news about their endorsements...
bjs3171, on 02/04/2008, -12/+4dupe, but dugg.
Armitage, on 02/04/2008, -35/+4I can't believe you all are falling for that good cop (Obama)/bad cop(Clinton) crap.

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007

8. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announ ...

Enough with the Obama stories. BURIED.
- pintomp3, on 02/04/2008, -2/+6Judicial Watch describes itself as "a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation"
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch
  nice try.
- bitspace, on 02/04/2008, -1/+6You cite a conservative and heavily conservative-backed organization and expect to be taken seriously? Buried.
- Pake, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2I want to go back to the days of playing "Where's Waldo?" with Ron Paul supporters. It was much more fun when you guys weren't so obviously retarded about it.
dagamer34, on 02/04/2008, -16/+2I wonder when she told her husband, Arnold Schwarzenegger
Jude007, on 02/04/2008, -24/+4Apart from people who can't do parallel parking, who else supports Obama?
olik, on 02/04/2008, -15/+1WTF I CAN'T SUBMIT LINKS FROM DIVSHARE!!!!! Someone else figure out how to submit this thing:
http://www.divshare.com/download/3689132-db9
(Hypothetical Obama Ad, as read by Matt Miller on Left, Right and Center)
stevebee, on 02/04/2008, -24/+7Obama has never had a real job in his life. Never DONE anything. He's great at promising to give away the money that other people have earned. But that's not a very hard gig.
He's buddies with Nation of Islam apparatchniks. He's got terrorist-excusers on his payroll. His chosen pastor says that Louis Farrakhan is the greatest.
But he's handsome.
- mlvassallo, on 02/04/2008, -3/+6Hateful much?
- sedlock, on 02/04/2008, -4/+3and for some reason he's the least "douchebaggy" of all the candidates. forgive me for being cynical, but that gets my vote after what we've experienced in the past eight years. Least "douchebaggy". Christ.
- nirav72, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3Wow..a disgruntled Ron Paul supporter?
mlvassallo, on 02/04/2008, -16/+13Well this is a No *****. She is a Kennedy. The biggest question mark is why is she married to a Republican Governor who is only Republican in name affiliation alone.
- oldgal, on 02/04/2008, -0/+9There was a time when Republicans were fiscally responsible and stood for ideas not ideology. Consider him an "old time" Republican.
- aussieNickuss, on 02/04/2008, -1/+6Arnold seems like a pretty left oriented Republican to me.
- nirav72, on 02/04/2008, -0/+4Maybe she liked the accent. "I'll be back..." in Austrian.
- jaderobbins, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1i was wondering why this was a surprise. . . . her family is pretty firmly entrenched in the liberal side of things.
- chase001, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2Arnold is a very fiscally conservative Republican. The problem is most people don't remember what that is because they haven't seen one since before Reagan in the GOP. The fiscal conservatives are now in the DLC in the Democratic Party. Don't confuse neo-cons for consersvatives.
protodon, on 02/04/2008, -12/+5Wow, even Skeletor is endorsing Obama these days!
- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -0/+4That's Rumsfeld.
optimusprime01, on 02/04/2008, -7/+1This must have been pissed off our beloved arnie big time.Because he's repulican and he endorsed Mccain. He must have said to John Mccain, "My mission is to protect you" and now he will fail his mission :).
- jaderobbins, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Probably didn't piss him off, he's probably used to her supporting democrats.
JavanSClark, on 02/04/2008, -0/+14I laugh at all the grey here. Move along haters.
Jude007, on 02/04/2008, -8/+1I would comment but I'm busy. I think I've got a design finalized. The worlds first patented ***** Detector. Apparently no one, not a single person in the United States of America anyway, can tell the difference between ***** and Shinola. I'm gonna make a killing.
msk275, on 02/04/2008, -10/+3Since when did Primaries become a popularity contest? oh wait.... uhhh...
milliamp, on 02/04/2008, -1/+15I think Arnold has no choice but to back a republican. Without doing that his party would never again back him on anything. He is backing McCain who is leading the party and may have the best chance at winning (but likely will not).
Since we mostly all know it is a democrat who is going to win, it makes sense to speak out and support either Clinton or Obama.
Obama may just well take California, and if he does it might mean the presidency.

People from California (Maria Shriver included) probably don't want to sit in the losers circle with McCain.
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -1/+4"When" Obama wins and NOTHING "CHANGES" and your government is raping you of your hard earned money and sending Americans to kill and die in foreign lands, every one of you retards will be joining hands in the biggest circle of losers in American history.
  
  In other words, voting for the next person to sh!t all over you doesn't make you a winner.
Grego123, on 02/04/2008, -10/+3This is outright ***** now that Zbigniew and Obama are together..

Zbigniew Brzezinski has endorsed your Obama candidate - Obama is no longer against the machine when the David Rockefeller protege, founder of the trilateral commission, and creator of Al Qeada via Operation Cyclone is behind him. Hes not just endorsed him, hes working for the campaign and opening speeches for him. Its not hard to figure out he will be the new foreign policy adviser as Obama has adopted Brzezinskis foreign policy.

Obama has also said "Theres not much difference between my position on Iraq and George Bush’s position at this stage. The difference in my mind is whos in a position to execute." Thats one of the reasons they call him "Obomber". The other is that he said he wants to bomb targets in a nuclear bomb equipped country without that countries permission! Its time you all dropped this guy, youre being deceived - hes not anti war, hes all for the endless war on terror that "will not end in our lifetimes" as his blood relative Dick Cheney said.

Read Shadows of Power by James Perloff for more info on Brezinski and the Council On Foreign Relations - http://tinyurl.com/3xac82 The anglo american establishment is backing Obama 100% with this endorsement - its probably worse than the military industrial complex endorsing Hitlery.

Obamas wife Michelle is a director of the Chicago council on foreign relations too - A globalist establishment group formed by bankers and is dedicated to ending American Sovereignty - read that book I linked for more info on them. Obama is literally in bed with the anglo american establishment.

Obamas take on attacking Iran is that the use of military force should not be taken off the table when dealing with Iran, which he called "a threat to all of us." Cheney would be proud.

You are not winning anything but your own destruction with Obama. He's more of the same - just another skin color.

Who would vote for Obama anyway? I could only see people voting for him if they love the way this endless war is going, want to end the country by joining the NAU, and are sick of the Constitution and bill of rights. He gives good sounding speeches, but theyre broad with no specifics and with "hope" as the main message. With the lack of details on his policies, hes obviously deceiving you all.
- sjmorton, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2I'll bet that tinfoil hat suits you.
- Epik, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Agreed. Obama as president isn't upsetting anybody at the top or in the corporate media. They really are good at getting people to think their vote for Obama is somehow a vote for freedom and change.
yndy, on 02/04/2008, -11/+5Ready to be dug down but... Who the hell cares?
Maria Shriver - she's relevant why? Oh yeah, she was a reporter who married Arnold Schwarzenegger - and was JFK's niece. And this makes her opinion important because?

This is as important as saying "Bob, the mechanic down at the Jiffy Lube came out and endorsed Obama."
- janoo1989, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2brace yourself mate.
  - Jfox386, on 02/04/2008, -1/+0O M G
- cualcrees, on 02/04/2008, -0/+5He did??... Bob?... Really?
  I'm voting for Obama!
- solarisom, on 02/04/2008, -0/+7She's the first lady of a pivotal Super Tuesday state.
- jaderobbins, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1yes but once again why is this a surprise? The headline should read "member of religiously democratic family supports a democrat!"
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -1/+1Her husband has no clue what party he's in.. I don't think anyone does. He's just some sort of weird/cool/confused guy in Sacramento who talks funny.
- chase001, on 02/04/2008, -0/+2Oh I forgot celebrity endorsements are only important from brainless action stars supporting a Republican. Republicans hate Hollywood unless they endorse them. Then they have true man love.
s1mph0ny, on 02/04/2008, -7/+2Shocking, she endorsed the same candidate as her mom?
TomJoad, on 02/04/2008, -8/+6why do people still care about the Kennedys?
- DCGaymer, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2For the same reason they still care about the King family.
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -4/+1Because the only Kennedy president was the worst president ever.
mrzack, on 02/04/2008, -5/+3Downfall of America: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQi4-97GXrI&feature ...
jjacksonRIAB, on 02/04/2008, -10/+5Invisible Pink Unicorns endorse Obama...

Buried.
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2Care Bear endorse obama-endorsing unicorn. Me Grimlock, me ah-toe-bot. Me endorse Tom Cruise.
Lowrider49, on 02/04/2008, -10/+3Obama and Clinton are now kissing each other, planning their partnership to install a Communist/Socialist government that forces you to pay more taxes for benefits for everybody else. McCain is a militarist armed with the Bush Doctrine and he is running on a platform that says your jobs are not coming back, the illegals are not going home, but we are going to have more wars. Romney is in love with Romney and he's trying to buy his way into the “social elite”. Huckabee is preaching to the people to elect him so you can pay a 39% federal sales tax. Don't You Get It Yet? There is a Solution.....Ron Paul. Stop pandering and seriously read about this guy and vote.
- jaderobbins, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Yes, your propaganda is convincing. I will read about this "RuPaul" fella you think so highly of.
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1I vote Obama becuh I want CHANGE *droolz*. OK OK no me kidding.. I vote Hillawee becuh I want fwee condoms and I like picking up amigos at Home Depot - they drive down the price of my begeetabils YAY.
sandilincoln, on 02/04/2008, -4/+5If I had a fantasy team who supported OBAMA, my first choice would be Maria because I care about what she thinks. I already loved Barack and actually switched parties of 25 yrs to vote for him in the Iowa Caucus, but she sealed the deal for me. I really cared what she thought.
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -2/+4Me too. I really care. I love caring. I'm a carebear and carebears share the care and have fur n hair.
  I can't wait for the CHANGE. I love the CHANGE. Obama gon' bring the CHANGE. I like him, he's black.
copaceticZ, on 02/04/2008, -8/+1WAKE UP PEOPLE ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS ARE COMING OUT AND ENDORSING OBAMA BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN BEAT HIM AND WILL HAVE NO CHANCE AGAINST HILLARY! GET SOME ***** BRAINS PEOPLE!
- Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Soooooooooooooooooooo............... what you're saying is HIllary is one scary ass bitch right? I'm scared to death of her, NO JOKE.
- copaceticZ, on 02/08/2008, -0/+1no what i'm saying is only the idiots who show up for the primary's will vote for obama. I personally believe america is making a huge mistake with either of these candidates. You can't take 2 steps forwards when all we really need is to take 1.
Trillion08, on 02/04/2008, -7/+2LOL what a f&cking dumb b!tch. Just goes to show you all f&cking politicians are the same crap spewing out of the same gutter..
OBAMA: CHANGE! CLINTON: FREE CONDOMS! MCCAIN: 100 YEARS OF WAR IN IRAQ! MCCAIN/HILLARY: AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! HUCKABEE: AMEND THE CONSTITUTION WITH THE BIBLE!
odigity, on 02/04/2008, -1/+2Buried as obamaspam. This is getting insanely out of hand, way worse than Paul's popularity that everyone's been bitching about. And he's actually the good candidate.
meanrabbit, on 02/04/2008, -6/+2
Read if you think Obama is so COOL Can we get screwed over again? - YES WE CAN!

It is this strategy in the art of war which we are seeing once again in a presidential primary. Predictably, the two “main” political parties have thrown out their choices to see which of them will stick by offering up the most enticing bait - Congressman Ron Paul being the exception.

In the case of “Change we can believe in,” Barack Obama, you can expect no change. Obama, has baited voters with the usual rhetoric, making promises he cannot keep. Obama is just another clue less, spit and polished politician who is completely ignoring, if he even he even understands the subject matter, the genesis of the financial tsunami beginning to roll across this land. Obama’s bait is cloaked in what mother government can do for you with the biggest carrot being health care using fancy, deceptive double speak.

During one of the debates, he and Marxist Hillary Clinton discussed whether or not Americans should be “mandated,” (forced), to purchase health insurance. Stalin-esque Clinton actually took this communist concept one giant step further:

“Speaking on ABC’s “This Week” program, the Democratic senator from New York said she might be willing to have wages garnished if people refuse to buy health insurance.” Of course, this is unconstitutional and would be shot down by every court in this country.
Obama wants criminals (illegal aliens who smuggle themselves across our borders) to have driver’s licenses so they can kill you or your loved ones and skip back across the border. Same old pimping for votes from a particular race of people, promoted by those advancing communism in America.
- Nick519, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1dugg down because you obviously don't know what marxism is.
infinity777, on 02/04/2008, -0/+3Lets help him out any way we can
http://my.barackobama.com/page/contribute
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/volunteer
Together we can help elect a decent honest man to the white house
OBAMA 08 YES WE CAN!
iplayyouandme, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Substance over style? Is that the latest Clinton viral talking point? What substance does Hillary have over Obama when Hillary has less time in elected office than Obama?

Is her failed 1st attempt at national healthcare a plus for experience? Is her failed judgement to authorize the war a plus for experience? Is this the substance we're talking about?

All three of the major democratic candidates had the same issues with very similar solutions that we could all live with. Now with Edwards out we have to chose the person who can united us as a nation to get the results we desire; democrats and republicans. The Clintons can't do that. They will energize the republican base and even if they beat McCain, the Clintons will bring that polarizing fight with them into the White House.

Do we really need a president who will continue to polarize us as a nation? Do we need more of the same?
iplayyouandme, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Substance over style? Is that the latest Clinton viral talking point? What substance does Hillary have over Obama when Hillary has less time in elected office than Obama?

Is her failed 1st attempt at national healthcare a plus for experience? Is her failed judgement to authorize the war a plus for experience? Is this the substance we're talking about?

All three of the major democratic candidates had the same issues with very similar solutions that we could all live with. Now with Edwards out we have to chose the person who can united us as a nation to get the results we desire; democrats and republicans. The Clintons can't do that. They will energize the republican base and even if they beat McCain, the Clintons will bring that polarizing fight with them into the White House.

Do we really need a president who will continue to polarize us as a nation? Do we need more of the same?
tinko, on 02/04/2008, -0/+1Gotta love the Kennedys
Show 51 - 54 of 54 discussions
Login or register to add a comment

Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.

California First Lady Maria Shriver Endorses Obama

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Login or register to add a comment

California First Lady Maria Shriver Endorses Obama

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Related by Keyword

Woman almost sold 1869 baseball card for $10

Sarah Palin 2009 Calendar Becomes an Amazon Bestseller

Barack Obama vows to keep Blackberry despite hacking fears

Login or register to add a comment