Digg - Bill Burton Isn't Taking Any Bull From Faux Noise Channel

937 Comments
Who Dugg It?

col381, on 10/28/2008, -25/+1046This was just too funny to watch. Bill Burton did a great job of getting the message out, while Fox's Megyn Kelly uses the tried and true Fox "Democrat" interview technique of 1. Make outrageous statement, 2. Talk over the response, 3. Accuse the spokesperson of being a hypocrite & 4. Repeatedly insist that Fox is "Fair and Balanced".

You have to hand it to the Dems that are brave enough to go on to Fox knowing time and again this is how they are going to be treated.
- FrankHope, on 10/28/2008, -3/+164Barbie does news. Putting a pretty face on their propaganda doesn't make it any more "fair and balanced". Next step is for Fox news to switch to the Naked News format.
  - apothekari, on 10/28/2008, -17/+42There is absolutely NOTHING pretty about that face.
  - rpgmaker, on 10/28/2008, -21/+39Say what you want, Megyn Kelly is cute.
  - mbhx, on 10/28/2008, -3/+155The ugly is on the inside.
  - cplex, on 10/28/2008, -7/+36@rpgmaker
    
    Do you still find her cute when she is spewing Republican propaganda? Because I certainly do not.
  - paperclipsNsoup, on 10/28/2008, -4/+40She'd be a lot cuter if they switched to naked news format
  - EvilBaby, on 10/28/2008, -9/+37I'd cetainly still hit it. Sure it would be better with a sock in her mouth but she's still pretty hot.
  - 4321234, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17Too bad she's a butter mind.
  - Latentk, on 10/28/2008, -20/+2Haha you Diggerals always make me laugh. Its all of a sudden outrageous, even propaganda when one expresses views opposite to your own. This is why ignorant, unintelligent, and manipulated young college students make great Democrats. Its easy for them to believe all that they say and believe is truth.
  - DirtySanch, on 10/28/2008, -6/+2@Latentk; I'm not against anyone making statements that go against Barak, but the left wing has used the most sleazy tactics in trying to do so. If the counter attack methods made some more sense, and stayed on topic I would be able to take FOX as a trustworthy source of news.
  - veryabsurd, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Sure, you can express your opinion. But when it's absurd, inaccurate vituperation aimed at debasing your political adversaries, no one has to take it seriously; considering it dangerous to discourse in our country seems like an appropriate response to me.
  - elhaf, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1@stupidLatentk, the thing the reporter didn't let him say was what was actually on that audio. It is an audio of Barack Obama saying that the civil rights movement was wrong for trying to get the courts to do all the work of equalizing opportunity for minorities, and that instead some of that should have been carried out legislatively. Not sure where the wealth distribution fits in there, other than Obama saying the judicial branch shouldn't be deciding matters of that sort.
  - Fordi, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1@Latentk:
    Not opposite our own. Opposite to reality.
    
    Calling out liars in politics is, lately, a public service, given the number of them. Most of them appear to hail from the republican party. As such, republicans are often getting called out as liars. Deal with it.
  - BoxAdorable, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Latentk - "ignorant, unintelligent, and manipulated young college students".....you mean libertarians?
  - livesunexamined, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Latentk, you actually proved that Fox News has an obvious bias. When a "Fair and Balanced" news station "expresses views opposite to your own" it's not news, it's opinion. News stations, no matter how unbalanced or otherwise, should never put opinion or personal views into anything. When this happens, it's complete ***** and they say "fair and balanced" to get others to believe them. Unfortunately, it works and some Americans completely buy it. As for the rest of the world...well, most of them hate America, and with it, Fox News.
- gridity, on 10/28/2008, -8/+143I don't get this whole "redistribution of wealth" controversy... I mean, taxes *in and of themselves* redistribute the wealth. Period. We've lived with a "redistribution of wealth" system of government for hundreds of years now. This is nothing new to the United States. Really the heart of the controversy is the question of WHO the wealth gets redistributed TO. With Bush, the wealth got redistributed to the very wealthy and to large corporations. Under Obama, it would be mostly redistributed to the middle class and small businesses. Not sure why Bill Burton doesn't just say *that* in response to this "controversy."
  
  Redistribution of wealth does not equate to socialism. If that's the case, then, gasp, we're a socialistic country already. (And in fact, in many MANY ways we already are socialistic... I mean, when you call 911 for help, do you have to give them your credit card number and pay for them to send someone out? No. That's socialism at work, yet no one has a problem with it.)
  - Snoosy, on 10/28/2008, -72/+6I love when people reply to posts at the top of the comments only to say something completely irrelevant to the original post.
  - MrSpontaneous, on 10/28/2008, -0/+52What's even more interesting is Obama's statement had nothing to do with the present day - he was referring to actions from the civil rights era.
  - diggit83, on 10/28/2008, -1/+57Thats exactly why this is a fake controversy. Faux news hears him say "redistribute" and the run around screaming "DID YOU HEAR THAT HES TALKING ABOUT REDISTRIBUTING WEALTH!!!! OHHHH I TOLD YOU LISTEN HERE WHEN YOU CAN CLEARLY HEAR HIM SAY REDISTRIBUTE.
    
    Then they play THAT part of the clip and build their story around it. You know, Id love to do an IQ test of MSNBC, CNN, and FOX NEWS viewers....just to see if you need to be stupid to believe their *****, because to me I can see right through their ***** every time.
    
    That said, I usually watch CNN or MSNBC, MSNBC tends to be left leaning in its coverage, especially Keith Olberman and Rachel Maddow. I still watch them, because I enjoy laughing at John McCains every day ***** ups. At least MSNBC doesnt manufacture stories like FAUX news.
  - lauraou7, on 10/28/2008, -0/+24"taxes *in and of themselves* redistribute the wealth."
    
    You are so right! I have been saying that all along. People need to quit freaking out about this.
  - gmeluski, on 10/28/2008, -2/+11Taxes used to be 77 per cent for the very rich. That was back in the good 'ol days!!!
  - mecharabbit, on 10/28/2008, -7/+2Yeah, give us the fair tax already and all this controversy will go away.
    http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
  - smotpoker, on 10/28/2008, -2/+3"I mean, when you call 911 for help, do you have to give them your credit card number and pay for them to send someone out?"
    
    Probably not the best example. Unlike law enforcement and fire dept (with fires anyway) ambulances and other medical expense are not socialized. Take just about any ambulance just about any distance and you will get at the very least a $200-300 charge (I've heard of them being as high as $800 when there were no life threatening injuries and the hospital was just a few miles away). Once you get to the emergency room you have to pay atrocious fees... I remember when my ex was in the hospital for 3 weeks and we got her bill, they were charging her literally $12 each for her aspirin (or ibuprophren or whatever).
    
    I'm just saying if you want to illustrate our current socialism, maybe you should stick to the services that really are socialized (Postal, libraries, fire dept, police, city works, school, etc) and are (or have been for many people anyway) integral to the fabric of modern society.
  - kisforkat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5Unless I've been doing something very wrong my whole life, you call 911 for the police and fire department, too... which are socialized as you said. So the example is fine.
  - smotpoker, on 10/28/2008, -3/+2@kis
    
    Not exactly fine. The implication of his statement is that emergency services via 911 are free to the community because tax payers pay the cost for those services. This is untrue because medical (and probably other emergency services) charge individuals each time they are used.
    
    Whether this is more due to greed in various levels of the government or greed in the medical industry I am not sure but either way it is a threat to economic stability of many people and thought I should point it out. It would suck if some immigrant got a stomach ache and decided to call an ambulance or something rather than wait on a cab or friend because he thought it was free (as ambulances and housecalls are in many other countries) because grid accidentally mislead him :P.
    
    Oh yeah, I also wanted to correct my previous comment. Law enforcement isn't socialized either (at least not completely). Suspects (I will not call them criminals because a large number are unjustly convicted and exploited for their $$ IMO) consistently have to pay for court costs and restitution. Granted not all of them can/do and the government actually does foot some of those bills but since the suspect is charged and their credit ruined it is inaccurate to say it is exactly socialized per se I think. They probably wouldn't function as efficiently without taxes but to say they are financed through taxes when fines are so high, people are essentially extorted into paying them with little opportunity to appeal/defend while others have their credit ruined, so many people are wrongfully convicted and so much law enforcment is focused on the drug war... it's hard to count that as free to the public either IMO.
    
    Anyway, sorry to knit-pick. I'm somewhat OCD like that at times
  - Eslamicolt3, on 10/28/2008, -8/+1And you're right. Taxes are inherently socialistic, and that's the problem. The more money you pump into the government, the bigger it gets. Lower taxes are always a good thing. The problem with Obama's "tax cuts for 95% of Americans" is that they aren't tax cuts at all, but tax credits. You don't even need a job to qualify for them. That's welfare, and that IS socialism. Another misconception is this idea of "tax cuts for the rich" that you keep hearing. To start, "rich" is anyone making over 200k, according to the government. Tax cuts during the Bush era were dolled out on a percentage basis, so if you made 2 million in a single year, you got a much larger tax cut than Joe the Plumber. But guess what? Joe millionaire also paid a whole lot more in taxes that year too. The democrats like to win votes by pitting the classes against each other and swooping in to grab votes. They demonize the "evil corporations" and the "elite 2%" and like to preach the grossly over-simplified message of dissent, but fail to mention that the large companies and wealthiest men and women of America are the world-movers. When you give specific tax cuts to these kind of industrialists, what you're really doing is allowing them to hire more people, create a better quality of life for its employees, and stimulate the economy. People need to think more critically before jumping on the bandwagon, torch and pitchfork in hand.
  - gridity, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8@smotpoker....
    
    Well, I have called 911 twice in my life. Once for being mugged and once for my house being robbed. (fun days, yes...) So I was thinking more along the lines of "Help, someone's trying to rob me or kill me" sort of 911 call. :)
    
    Now, I never got a bill from the police department, but...should I have?
    
    You're right, medicine is not totally socialized right now, though parts *are* if you look carefully. There are definitely medical programs for the poor already in existence - under (gasp) a Republican administration! Would such programs imply that Bush is a socialist too? No - and to draw that conclusion would be ridiculous. The same way it's ridiculous for anyone to conclude Obama is a socialist for his thoughts on how we design our tax system and where the money goes. As if socialism is something "new" and "dangerous" to our country.
    
    If you don't like the 911 example... there are plenty of other examples in which we are already socialistic in this country. Basically any service that we are spending tax dollars on that is for the overall public good is socialistic - libraries, schools, the military, police, firemen, etc. We've never been a purely capitalistic society.
  - shmatt, on 10/28/2008, -1/+5@Eslamicolt3
    it's insane that people still need to have this pointed out:
    What you speak of is reagan's trickle-down theory. IT DOESN'T WORK. Bush's tax cuts did nothing to help. Also I would like to know what the hell you're talking about when you say "the large companies and wealthiest men and women of America are the world-movers." They can do good it's true, but they've done a buttload of damage to our quality of life too. Are you rich or have a big stake in a large coproration? If not, why on earth would you idolize enitities such as these.
    
    Scientists, engineers, and inventors are world-movers. Artists and musicians can definitely change the world. Rich people? There's no correlation. Some of them deserve every penny, and many are worthless scum.
    
    Either way, THEY DON'T NEED A TAX CUT
  - kisforkat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Shmatt's right. While some of that top 2% are owners of corporations and the like, there are others who just inherited, too. There are far better ways to move the world than with money.
    
    What eslamicolt is talking about are trickle-down economics. And like a dear friend of mine says, "The only time something is trickling on you is when you're getting pissed on."
  - Emelius, on 10/28/2008, -2/+1Theres a reaosn why taxes were declared unconstitutional so long ago (before they were put back in by some crappy amendment).
  - smotpoker, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1@grid
    
    I feel ya, sorry to knit-pick (as I mentioned earlier). I partly didn't want to give the wrong idea to people and partly wanted to illustrate how some of these tax-funded public services are being exploited/overrun by corporate profiteers and hurting everyone in general in the process.
    
    You are right, that sort of 911 call is usually free to the caller. I just also happen to believe most of the costs to the department, and even some profit, are usually recovered from suspects in various ways (fines, tickets, late fees, court costs, incarceration expenses that the suspect or his family usually pays, labor, confiscated property...). Even when charged for offenses in which there was no cost whatsoever to any "victim" local government gets some money. Often $100 in court costs adds up to like $1.5k/hr for them.
    
    Anyway... let me get off of my soapbox. Like I said, I just wanted to qualify what you said a bit and explain how local governments and corporations often screw us just as bad as the federal one (probably worse in many cases)
- duckley, on 10/28/2008, -6/+159Wow, Bill Burton was IMPRESSIVE.
  
  In spite of having Megan's nasty attacks pumped straight into his ear, he held strong.
  
  (You will note that whenever Faux has liberals on, their hosts always interrupt when points are being made against the Faux agenda)
  - chesterjosiah, on 10/28/2008, -1/+12Agreed. I want to see round 2! Hopefully he goes back on there soon.
  - surfacewound, on 10/28/2008, -6/+25I'd like to pump some nasty attacks into Megan Kelly.
    
    Yeah sorry I couldn't resist.
  - Stavrosian, on 10/28/2008, -1/+47I'd have to be high as a kite to take that "interview" with the same good grace that Burton did. I wanted to throttle her just watching it. His amused little comments saved me ("Okay Megan, I understand that you don't like being interrupted, but just go right ahead and interrupt me anyway." was the winner, I think).
    
    What a pathetic sham this network is. Honestly, who are they kidding? If you were to take even 5 minutes to get your news from any other source in the world you could see what a joke Fox is.
  - duckley, on 10/28/2008, -2/+18The only thing that would have made it better?
    
    About half-way through, when Megan was ranting, he should have calmly said:
    
    "Now, just calm down, Megan. Take a deep breath and calm down."
    
    Priceless.
  - sarge96, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1I particularly liked her response to his sarcasm:
    "I know you like to be sarcastic Bill, and you can do that on other channels, because we don't do that here."
- noprtyaff, on 10/28/2008, -88/+10Well, naturally the Obama bots on digg.com will think the guy on the right did a great job. But Obama has many questionable, radical associations in his past. This is a perfectly valid concern to many people as it relates to the decisions he would make on the issues in office.
  
  So, the question becomes: if Obama is elected will he risk alienating most people in the U.S. and govern as a true radical which would be inconsistent with his movement to the center once he became more visible on a national stage or, will he remain in the center?
  
  For the record though, its no surprise that Fox News is plugging the moderate-leftist McCain and seemingly ALL of the other network and cable news worship Obama. They all have their own individual propaganda machines in that they own the movie studios, book publishers, social networking sites and news channels. A nice way to control thought on the left or on the "right." Don't ya think?
  
  But I don't watch Fox News. It is owned by a known globalist Rupert Murdoch. The second largest shareholder is a Saudi sheik. Like all of the other network and cable news channels they are only concerned with ratings or, at least nothing that would go against Rupert Murdoch's globalist agenda for example.
  
  We're Screwed in '08
  
  Have a nice day.
  - HumanNouveau, on 10/28/2008, -4/+27Obama has radical associations in the past as well as conservative ones. Strange that the Democratic base isn't worried about his membership on a board that included *gasp* conservatives. Obama is the right President for our times because he associates with radicals and conservatives. These are all people in our neighborhoods. Peace.
  - cplex, on 10/28/2008, -8/+16You are a douche.
    
    Have a nice day.
  - busket, on 10/28/2008, -4/+20I guess when you're crazy, McCain is a moderate leftist.
  - BrewBeau, on 10/28/2008, -0/+18McCain is considered moderate-leftist?
  - BECoole, on 10/28/2008, -21/+3"Obama has radical associations in the past as well as conservative ones"
    
    Tell me about the conservative ones. Did he bump into a conservative in the grocery store?
    
    And don't say "Annenberg". Obama worked there, but directed it's money to leftist organizations. Much in the same way the Left has corrupted other charitable trusts.
  - HumanNouveau, on 10/28/2008, -0/+13@BECoole. er... ah... Colin Powell. Oh, I'm sorry that one was hidden in plain sight.
  - noprtyaff, on 10/28/2008, -4/+1@ HumanNouveau
    
    Thanks for your comments. But Powell is no more of a Conservative than McCain is. Neither are conservative:
    
    "Powell said he remains a Republican, even though he sees the party moving too far to the right. He supports abortion rights and affirmative action, and said McCain and Palin, both opponents of abortion, could put two more conservative justices on the Supreme Court.
    
    "I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration," Powell said.
    http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/10/19/america/ ...
    
    "...the party moving too far to the right.." LOL. Wow! Powell has really come unglued of late.
    
    Furthermore, McCain is certainly not one anyone should trust to put Conservative justices on the Supreme Court. He is proud of the fact that he has stuck it to conservatives over and over again a number of times. I guess that makes him a "Maverick". Pathetic.
    
    BTW, do you know the nice thing about getting dugg down on ObamaBot.com...er, I mean digg.com??? People still read your posts.
    
    Have a nice day.
  - JickBahTech, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3So wait BECoole, because he was on an education board with a former radical terrorist, THAT's him having an association with terrorists.
    BUT, that board also included several republicans/conservatives, and that's NOT an association.
    
    You sir are an idiot.
  - Brooks007, on 10/28/2008, -5/+1well said col381. I think faux news won this debate.(by the way i dont watch fox news and im not voting for Mcain or Obama)
    
    and yes McCain is a moderate-leftist
    
    start the digg down
- andibarnes, on 10/28/2008, -0/+59What's good though is that even she doesn't seem to think that McCain can win - the way she was phrasing the questions sounded like the election was already Obama's.
  
  BTW, it's not - go and vote
- rpgmaker, on 10/28/2008, -5/+21Actually, I didn't think the guy owned, he defended himself as well as he could considering how annoying the anchors are in Fox news but Megyn Kelly was on him the whole time. His performance started to improve after 4 minutes.
- _skin_, on 10/28/2008, -2/+101"Its fair and balanced because we tell you its fair and balanced god damn it!" - Fox News
  
  She is like a female Bill Oreilly...
  - chesterjosiah, on 10/28/2008, -0/+44Does *ANYBODY* think that Fox News is fair and balanced? I'd love to see *somebody* comment here and try to defend that.
  - zeroskater0310, on 10/28/2008, -63/+1I think Fox News tends to be more centered than any other news channel out there. And if you check any of the News Channel Bias polls they will always be at the bottom. That's as Fair and Balanced as your going to get, buddy. While MSNBC is always at the top for being the most left-wing bias piece of ***** channel this country has ever seen. I mean, who watches that channel and doesn't feel the need to take a shower and wash the dirt off afterwords? The only show anyone watches is Olbermann's and Maddow's. And both of those barely reach a million viewers! And those are prime-time shows! Olbermann's show is the only thing keeping NBC from canceling their news channel altogether. Before Maddow he threatened to quit (knowing it would cause MSNBC to be canceled altogether) if they didn't hire her. He also threatened to quit when he didn't like the way his door to his office was shaped. But that's just good ole Keith.
    
    Compared to MSNBC Fox News is a godsend. I think it's hilarious that you, as a far lefty no doubt, don't claim any bias of unfair news to CNN or MSNBC, yet Fox News being center-right is huge bias and needs to be stopped. Typical. You all will just have to come to grip with the reality that Fox News is the least bias and most fair and balanced news channel, any data will prove that. I mean, did you listen to her during that video? All the data she put up on Obama's news coverage and bumps and thumb ups dominating McCains? How she told the percentages of positive Obama coverage over McCains and the latest poll data showing Fox News being the least bias channel out there? Or did you just try to skip past that and focus on the Fox negatives? Pfft.
    
    By the way, all you diggers here being leftys will think Bill did great because he's one of you, hell, I bet you all felt a tingle run up your leg! Truth is all he did was make accusations and barely answered his questions. She only talked over him when he didn't stay on point and he talked over her many times. I thought Bill was horrible, just another Dem that can't stand by the sewage that spews from his mouth.
    
    Fin
  - thegreat59, on 10/28/2008, -2/+16I don't think any of us deny the bias on CNN and MSNBC, especially, but I also won't deny the bias on FOX news. All three of these news stations are a joke and personally I watch them to see how much ***** they can spoon feed to Americans and not get called on it. Thankfully the big three news stations do well in checking each others "facts". They should just call it opinion news and get it over with. For real news NPR and BBC are they way to go, and for anything shown on the big three networks take it with a grain of salt, look at the comment made by the candidate and just read it for yourself before hearing the ***** spouted by the "news" anchor. And as for that poll of the least biased network, look, Americans are high on their high horse if they watch a news network primarily, they want to believe it's not biased so it's no surprise that Fox News is consistently voted the least biased, because most Americans watch it.
  - kisforkat, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3Actually, the dominance of FOX is being challenged recently by the other big news stations. Probably because the political pendulum of the country is swing back left after so many years stuck on the right. And nobody likes sore losers.
    
    thegreat59 is right. NPR and BBC are where to go for unbiased news, but we Americans like a little tussle in our politics, which is why the big three are all biased stations. Unbiased is just so... bland :-)
  - illegalcortex, on 10/28/2008, -1/+8@zeroskater: "And if you check any of the News Channel Bias polls they will always be at the bottom."
    
    Wikipedia begs to differ:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_cont ...
  - yamikaze, on 10/28/2008, -2/+8Psh! Wikipedia? Don't make me laugh. We all know that reality has a liberal bias!
  - elhaf, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2Fox news is certainly biased to the right. I don't see why there should be any bones about this. MSNBC is biased to the left. Big deal.
  - abooth413, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2I wanted to post something about this video. I'd have to say the part that pisses me off the most is her defense of "Fair and Balanced" ...
    
    I posted this screenshot as 1 small piece of evidence to the contrary Megyn -
    
    http://digg.com/politics/Fair_and_Balanced_Confirm ...
  - zeroskater0310, on 10/29/2008, -2/+0My bone with MSNBC is, they are so far left its ridiculous. I switch between Olbermann and Fox to see the difference in the way the report. I recall after one of the debates Fox News was reviewing it with their panel made up of both Republicans and Democrats. They were all talking about the wrongs and rights of both candidates. I switched to MSNBC and Olbermann is spouting his usually "McCain sucked McCain sucked McCain sucked" followed by "Marry me Obama Marry me Obama". I notice they never talk negative to the candidate they obviously are rooting for. And they always talk negative to the candidate they want to lose. If any channel here should be considered made up of fools and biased, it should be MSNBC.
    
    On to my polling statement, I admit not all polls show Fox as least bias, but most do. And I still stand by my statement that Fox is as fair as your going to get it these days. (Now that I think about it, I guess BBC would be up there too). What I like about Fox is that they always have people of varying parties instead of inviting people who agree with what your saying to further your point *cough Olbermann cough*. They even have a friggen hour long show hosted by both a Republican and Democrat.
    
    And while we're on the topic of Fox, I might as well say this too. If any of you actually watch the Factor you would know O'Reilly isn't some screaming maniac. He had some hiccups, but who hasn't? You can find tons of hot headed arguements between news anchors. But just because its Bill it makes front page news. I don't get it. The guy rarely yells or even gets a temper, last time he busted out was when he was pummeling the ***** out of Barney Frank, and lets face it, Frank deserved it. All he did was blame House Republicans and George Bush when everyone knew (even Dodd said it) he had a huge hand in the crisis.
    
    I know all the liberals out there think Fox is the anti-Christ, but if you actually sat down and watched the channel. Actually WATCHED it, you would see that they talk up and down to both candidates, they invite Democrats and Republicans on, they always give the opposing party the last word, they aren't afraid to question people the questions that really bother Americans instead of holding it in *cough Olbermann cough*, they don't humiliate people who don't agree with their point of view *cough Olbermann again cough*, etc. It really is a good news source.
  - poxonyou, on 10/29/2008, -1/+2MSNBC isn't leftist in the same way Fox favors the right. MSNBC has some left-leaning hosts, Olbermann and Maddow (Matthews is all over the place), but MSNBC's general news is just straight up reporting. Fox on the other hand injects a political slant on everything, no matter what show you're watching. MSNBC is basically countering Fox's right-leaning slant with a left (through some of its shows, not its news coverage all day), hoping to gain viewers that way.
    
    CNN and MSNBC don't have the same deliberate political agenda Fox does. I think CNN and MSNBC just want ratings and sway with the wind. There's no logical reason for the head of NBC to want to bias all of its news to the left, while the head of and the head of News Corp do see a logical benefit from helping conservatives stay in power; namely less media regulation and more corporate tax breaks. The heads of NBC know this as well, so they're careful about their slant, limiting it to specific shows and hosts, rather than trying to make it a "reality" to the viewer with a consistent slant across all shows, all day (as Fox does).
  - illegalcortex, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1@zeroskater
    
    A ratio of 50:6 for conservative guests:liberal guests is not "balanced." Go back and actually read the link I sent you. I think you are suffering from massive confirmation bias.
    
    And yes, having Olberman commenting on the debate was a mistake, just as it would have been to have O'Reilly do it. As poxonyou says, I think it has more to do with ratings than a network-wide ideology. They've had a lot of financial success with Olbermann as the anti-O'Reilly and are trying to milk it for all it's worth. Both are the equivalent forms of pundits on the extreme sides of one another. Having lived in Texas, I have watched PLENTY of fox news at restaurants, businesses and relatives houses. This includes The Factor. I speak from experience.
- LJSeinfeld, on 10/28/2008, -4/+38As I watched this interview, the issues being "discussed" were pushed further and further away from my consciousness, leaving me only with the reverberating thought: Wow, what a b i t c h.
- STARTSOMETHING, on 10/28/2008, -1/+26Everytime he said something bad, against the channel. Megan had to pull an Orielly.
- brickbat, on 10/28/2008, -2/+23Man, thats an insult to hooters.
- richirwin, on 10/28/2008, -8/+32That's one angry, attractive woman.
- sailadayaway, on 10/28/2008, -0/+15@andibarnes
  
  I agree, we can't get into this secure feeling and think that Obama has the election. Don't sit at home next week because you think the election's already won, get out and vote regardless, we all need to be part of this.
  - alittleroy101, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5I already voted.
  - oninbonin, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Hopefully it counted!
- HypocriteDigg, on 10/28/2008, -4/+6WTF? Is Megyn a man?
- firebhaal, on 10/28/2008, -1/+40It's sad how she doesn't realize fair and balanced doesn't mean equally good reviews of the candidates. If McCain sucks, he SHOULD only get 35% positive news time. Fair and balanced doesn't mean balancing unequal realities.
  - gandhi2, on 10/28/2008, -21/+2Oooh, but it does mean just that.
    
    I mean, if I'm born to a poor family, isn't it fair that I should be compensated by somebody born to a rich family? If a person is born in a minority, we need affirmative action to ensure that person gets a job.
    
    Fair and balanced, right? The entire system of taxation and social welfare and pre-emptive aggression for uncommitted sins against minorities is the epitome of balancing unequal realities.
  - absentmindedjwc, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3not to mention that "fair and balanced" coverage could entail this:
    1 very, VERY minor good point about Obama
    1 extremely large problem with Obama (like a past association or some such *****)
    1 very large positive about McCain
    1 very small negative about McCain
    
    ... yes, technically I was not fair nor balanced, but I still just gave you a dead on even review of both candidates (both 50% positive and 50% negative for each)
    
    And of course Fox News will be voted to be the most unbias news service, it is the most watched. That is like asking what is your favorite type of government in a poll in a communist country... they are of course going to say communist because they dont know anything else.
  - lululiu, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2@gandhi-
    
    Wait, are you saying that Fox news is practicing affirmative action for McCain's crappy campaign? I have no doubt, but is it right to do so? That the more a candidate lies to the American people, the more a network should broadcast his message and stand behind him in the name of journalistic integrity?
  - gandhi2, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2@lululiu
    Yes, you should take it as an affirmation of his *****.
    
    Voice of the minority and all. We need to make things FAIR, not give things to the most qualified, intelligent, or hard-working among us.
    
    What the hell, do you want live in a ***** meritocracy or something???
  - winampman2, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Its true that Fox News is fair and balanced - they did a scientific poll and asked their *own* viewers who was the most balanced and their viewers said Fox! It must be true!
- debvest, on 10/28/2008, -28/+1Bill Burton was not clear about Obama's beliefs. Is he Muslim, Is he friends with Terrorists (the ones that say they didn't do enough)???
  I watch FOX and feel that they are telling the truth, and heaven forbid, the Democrats are put down, since they aren't put down by any other news media....(ABC, CBS, and NBC)
  Nobody has talked about the two books where Obama talks about his heritage, and his comments where he says "he ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites"
  AND in 'Audacity of Hope', He says: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction".
  Nobody in his arena will talk about these things....and why he won't wear the "flag pin".
  - Portagine, on 10/28/2008, -0/+10You, sir, are an idiot!
  - gfnw, on 10/28/2008, -0/+9He's also building a mind control beam on the moon which will react to the drugs they've been putting in out water! Obama was responsible for Pearl Harbor! I hear he's even secretly a Buddhist!
    
    Don't elect this man!
  - costumemaker, on 10/28/2008, -0/+9I think, considering everything you just said, it is safe to say you are weak minded and that fox news was made for you so keep watchin'.
  - praveensg, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Did your nanny not show up today?
  - lostarchitect, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Major reading comprehension failure. Or, wait. You didn't actually read the book.
  - thedrizzle21, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3read this you jackass: http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_wr ...
  - malakite33, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAaaaaa...aaa.aaaa......aa
    
    Oh christ, I just got this email from my radically religious Grandma. EVERY single one of those statments are taken completely out of context, and a quick google search will show you that the BIG line at the end of that spam mail where it says " And now the scariest line of them all "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction"." The line from the book DOESN'T EVEN SAY THAT YOU JACK-ASS *****. The context in the book is that he is talking about what happened to Japanese people in WWII when they were put in camps simply because of their heritage and when asked if he would support doing something like that to Muslims he said "I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
    So he's talking about not discriminating against someone at a time of war who are Americans just because of their race, and if you think that doing that is OK then you are a ***** racist. It doesn't even say that word muslim in the quote it says "them". I'm sorry for being so crude but ***** like this really infuriates me. I don't care if you don't like someone for the issues they support or don't support, I don't give a ***** who you vote for. As long as you take 10 SECONDS and do some research on your own and don't get your "political knowledge" from some jack ass sending a spam mail around......peace
- Chonoon, on 10/28/2008, -4/+7I'm not for Obama, but this vid was funny as ***** :D
  - gwolf, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2That wasn't funny so much as scary. Fox's interview techniques border on assault and battery. They shout their "guest" down and make speeches. Arrogance, ignorance and blind loyalty like theirs are what got this country into the sorry state it's in. These are the tactics of fascism; intimidation, hostility suppression of other points of view and above all the Big Lie.
    
    I will be glad when they're kind of reporting goes out of style.
- muttsuki, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3it was funny how they pretty much talked over each other. i had to replay a few parts to actual hear what they were trying to say.
  
  but srsly, wtf FOX?
  
  just stfu, and we'll be oh so happy.
- SpyCatcher, on 10/28/2008, -6/+3I love reading stupid replies from ignorant people...
- PxCxG, on 10/28/2008, -5/+1As if Digg is fair and balanced as a news source?
  - shmatt, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2as if you're supposed to rely on digg as a news source? It's an algorithm my friend. I seriously doubt it contains any political functions
  - busta, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1He's right though, digg is very biased. On a lot of issues, you only get one side of the story here. The problem being that a lot of diggers "know" information that they've heard from only digg, and then go ahead and post / digg up stories about it.
    
    It's a large exercise in group think.
  - winampman2, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Digg is not a national news broadcast network on TV. Its own users decided on what stories go on the front page. Digg makes no claims about being "fair and balanced", only that it reflects what the users want to see.
    
    Fox News makes up fake stories and posts misleading false headlines on their front page. Then they claim to be fair and balanced.
- BoxAdorable, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2When they say fair and balanced, is that the results they got from the Foxnews.com poll?
- MrFisty, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Fair and balanced? Isn't there a saying about not trusting someone who says "trust me"?
  - RedStormRising, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Interesting comment on Reddit:
    " "....you should know, that in the polls as recently as this month, one taken by Rasmussen, the majority of Americans think that Fox is the LEAST biased out there and that MSNBC was first, CNN was second, Fox was LAST in terms of bias. Your guy is believed to be getting helped by 70% of the press corps according to the lastest Pew poll but you complain when Fox has the nerve to confront your candidate with his own words."
    
    Let's take a look at this poll. Some interesting points from the write up.
    
    "By a 39% to 20% margin, American adults believe that the three major broadcast networks deliver news with a bias in favor of liberals. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 25% believe that ABC, CBS, and NBC deliver the news without any bias.
    
    Similar results are found for CNN and National Public Radio (NPR). By a margin of 33% to 16%, Americans say that CNN has a liberal bias. The nation’s adults say the same about NPR by a 27% to 14% margin."
    
    Interesting, but now the important part.
    
    "There is one major exception to the belief that media outlets have a liberal bias—Fox News. Thirty-one percent (31%) of Americans say it HAS A BIAS THAT FAVORS CONSERVATIVES while 15% say it has a liberal bias."
    
    Least biased my ass you stupid whore. People think Fox is the least biased in favor of Democrats, duh! They also think you are the MOST BIASED in favor of Republicans, duh times 1000.
    
    What are the odds she'll let him come back with the real data and trash her Republican bitch talking point?
    SOURCE:
    
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol ...
    "
    ***** this Barbie in an anchor seat. I'm glad Burton kept his cool, I would have (and already did just looking at the interview from a computer) completely lost it. Fox was just trying to bait him like Biden, and try and get a neon sign news flash about it.
- y2kboy23, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Fair and balanced is when The Wall Street Journal slams Cindy McCain. That's the true definition that most Americans use.
- webwatch, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2Another example of fair & balanced reporting by our favorite news network - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTkqosRiyYo
spam2040, on 10/28/2008, -20/+772
- estee0703, on 10/28/2008, -2/+80except no buffalo wings
  - jezsik, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5Lots of chicken wings, though.
  - mecharabbit, on 10/28/2008, -0/+14Right-wing chicken hawks, you mean.
- thejimmyo, on 10/28/2008, -3/+12Pretty much, yeah.
  http://lots-o-thoughts.blogspot.com/search/label/F ...
- jj101, on 10/28/2008, -1/+12Complain! Let them know what you think. They want ratings. They allow their presenters to behave in this way becuase it is entertaining to people who are ignorant of the reality of the situation to have their views (which they got from Fox in the first place) defended in such a vitriolic fashion.
  
  Below is a link to the Fox News site. In the bottom left you can make a comment.
  
  http://www.foxnews.com/foxfan/index.html
- pintomp3, on 10/28/2008, -1/+53funny how she doesn't bring up the fact that fox news viewers are the least informed:
  
  http://blog.nodvin.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ ...
  - ShylockHolmes, on 10/28/2008, -0/+21and oldest, and most confused, and most scared...
  - mecharabbit, on 10/28/2008, -0/+15Oh, they're informed all right. Just terribly, terribly, mis-informed.
- MiserableTruth, on 10/28/2008, -1/+5I find that somewhat insulting, despite how funny it is.
  
  Hooters at least has good food! The only thing Fox News has going for them is that when all the major cable news channels are showing something live Fox always has the "livest(?)" broadcast, or the one with the least amount of delay.
- solarsavior, on 10/28/2008, -2/+22Wait. Hooter's has class. Fox News doesn't.
  
  Hooter's is very open about what it is. Fox News is not open at all that it is a neo-conservative propaganda organization.
- jtron9k, on 10/28/2008, -3/+8Dugg for comparing Fox to Hooters. Only problem is I like Hooters...
- firebhaal, on 10/28/2008, -3/+5but we like hooters?
- altgeeky1, on 10/28/2008, -2/+4Great... now I'll never eat at Hooters again.
  - lostarchitect, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4yes you will.
- duke3k, on 10/28/2008, -2/+4It really is like hooters. The primary failing of fox as a news institution isn't its bias(in fact, for the balance of the history of American journalism, bias is the norm, not "balanced" reporting), it's that they do no news whatsoever. They have no foreign correspondents. They take wire stories and turn them into Jerry Springer for their dumb audience who can't digest the news in any other way.
- bobartig, on 10/28/2008, -2/+6Except at Hooters, the wait staff does their best to make you feel comfortable and welcome, instead of repeatedly beating you over the head with inane chatter. Hooters - 1, Fox News - 0.
  
  Also, at Hooters, my understanding is that you can get a good, satisfying meal. Whereas Fox News will often leave you a dry empty husk of your former self. Hooters - 2, Fox News - 0.
  
  I could probably go on all day. I haven't even gotten to the buffalo wings, or the Hooters Girls yet.
- dogfood, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Hehe. Best statement I've read all day.
- tillerman00, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Hooters is the Fox News of chicken wing-titty joints.
  
  ?
- GregFD3S, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1Fox News is the WWE of Cable News.
- frequentFlyer, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3True, but that newscaster is hotter than any hooters girl I've seen. gyawd!
  - hmunkey, on 10/29/2008, -0/+3That's the only reason she has a job. She's obviously an idiot.
  - seltaeb4, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1And like most idiots that watch Fox News: the more ignorant they are, the more certain that they are right...
- Oddish, on 10/30/2008, -0/+1What a shameful insult to Hooters!
RFinCA, on 10/28/2008, -19/+441Shrill and angry. Keep it up Faux!
- jwolcott, on 10/28/2008, -1/+23The best counter-argument to this "spreading the wealth" baloney is for the Obama Campaign to point out that anything other than a Flat Tax is technically "spreading the wealth", so since McCain is not in favor of, nor will he be implementing a Flat Tax, he is also "spreading the wealth" by taxing wealthier Americans more than the rest.
- Smuikas, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17"[...] while THIRTY SIX percent is positive about John McCain!"
  
  That's because 74% of what John McCain does is terrible, and is reported as such.
  
  (I know I'm flubbing with statistics here, but so are they.)
  - Altaica, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17Flubbing with math too.
  - captnkurt, on 10/28/2008, -0/+13That's because 110% of people have some sort of opinion about John McCain.
  - winampman2, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2you mean 64% buddy
  - Smuikas, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Hey, to be fair I'd been up for 37 hours.
- tbredofsin, on 10/28/2008, -1/+16This whole "faux" pun would work a lot better if it wasn't pronounced "foe".
  - elhaf, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Yeah, it'd be better to say Fakes News or something like that.
  - tbredofsin, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1*****' News.
- wizbor, on 10/28/2008, -6/+1Obviously you've never watched Keith Olbermann
- greencandy, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3The interviewer was more long-winded and loud than the interviewee...
- drakethegreat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Damn she must be scared and thats why she feels the need to treat her guests like utter *****. It doesn't matter if he attacked you, he took the time from his busy schedule to talk to you and you just talk over him more the 60% of the interview.
  
  Of course by their own ***** they are rated most unbiased news organization around so what do I know. I just know that 4 out of 5 people worldwide support Obama.
- atgmac, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1Fox says: "Fox isn't biased"
  
  Gold. That has to be a paradox.
- GuacamoleSan, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2Wow she is a BITCH! She interrupts him and then says "stop interrupting me!" Jesus christ! Someone get this bimbo off the air!
  
  Best line at the end:
  (anchor interrupts Bill)
  "Alright Megan go ahead I understand you don't like being interrupted but go ahead." best line.
shampoovta, on 10/28/2008, -350/+17 Oh.

I think I get this, when an Obamatron says they won it means they got there ass handed to them. Kind a like Bush saying "Brownie you're doing a heck of a job" ...

So when you say Biden is a qualified VP you are actually saying he is retarded.

Oh I recognize this, huh and I thought there would be change?
- MikeyPow, on 10/28/2008, -5/+127I don't think when you talk louder and spew false facts you're handing someone their ass.
  
  Yes, the change is that they're finally not taking ***** from FOX.
- TotalHalibut, on 10/28/2008, -2/+84I guess you also think that Bill O'Rielly is a 'veteran journalist'.
- wcbb, on 10/28/2008, -2/+79Palin doesn't even know what the Vice President does.
  
  You don't get *****.
- vladin, on 10/28/2008, -2/+18What are tard.
  - oninbonin, on 10/28/2008, -2/+3How is babby formed?
- HtomSirveaux, on 10/28/2008, -1/+15Shut up.
- AvidPreatorian, on 10/28/2008, -3/+15THEIR!*
  
  you ass muncher
- CharlieBlix, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17Yes she won. If it was a "who can yell the loudest" match that is.
- zeroskater0310, on 10/28/2008, -37/+0Look at yourselves! Haha. You all group up on this page and talk about how ***** Fox News and Republicans are. Then one guy says something about as stupid as all of you sound and there are already -110 diggs on his comment and about...7 replies telling him to "shut up" or calling him a "tard" or "ass-muncher". Don't dish it if you can't take it!
  
  Haha, hypocrite diggers, my favorite source for tears.
  - andypop481, on 10/28/2008, -0/+21may you welcome a new source of tears november 5th.
  - flannerus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4It's very hypocritical to say what you think? No liberals here are claiming that we don't all believe in similar policies, just as you conservatives believe in similar ideals. "Look at yourselves"; yes, please, let us look at ourselves: we think Fox News is a load of *****. We don't like those who buy into what we believe is *****, thus we vote on their statements. We are then able to reply to those statements. We do so. "Don't dish it out if you can't take it!", hahah oh yes, because we believe something is wrong, we should also believe that we are wrong? Scooby Doo "hghhhuuuuuuuuhhhhh?! Rut the ***** are you talking about, Raagggie??"
- zeroshiftsl, on 10/28/2008, -0/+22Dear Digg,
  
  Please allow me to bury comments multiple times.
  
  Thanks
- Calcularius, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4Learn English, please.
- RoloTomasie, on 10/28/2008, -0/+12You, sir, are a detriment to those who actually use logic. Yours isn't even fuzzy, it's just missing.
  - oninbonin, on 10/28/2008, -1/+1"Absent" logic.
- Ferago, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3I am in awe of your ignorance, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter (the onion?)
  - GhostyBoy, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2The onion is clever.
  - enantiodromia, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Simpsons i think
- jeffbw, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Whoah! How do three-year-olds get on digg?
- enantiodromia, on 10/28/2008, -0/+7***** IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE
- wacked, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4Does anyone in the world know what this moron is saying? Anyone? ....nope....
  
  Must be just another moron... sad.
- daebat, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3-269 diggs... i'm pretty sure that means you're a ***** moron.
- DrumDog2112, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Please... POST MORE!!! You're absolutely ***** BRILLIANT!!!!
- mrASSMAN, on 10/29/2008, -0/+3If she was actually a reporter, there wouldn't be anything to "win".
fezzic, on 10/28/2008, -15/+490Good contrast of a rational person and a Fox news analyst
- SissySlapParty, on 10/28/2008, -0/+87BILL, YOU CAN TRY TO TALK OVER ME, BUT I'M NOT GONNA STOP.
  I'M NOT GONNA STOP.
  - chesterjosiah, on 10/28/2008, -2/+17HAVE YOU HEARD? THE BIRD IS THE WORD. EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THE BIRD IS THE WORD.
  - emmet, on 10/28/2008, -0/+18the funny thing about that comment was, that actually, her mic was much louder than his, so even if he tried to, there was no way he could "talk over her".
  - YawehsDead, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2mah she'emmet emmet.
    Noticed that too.
  - praveensg, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4She almost had an orgasm there :D
- EatSleepJeep, on 10/28/2008, -0/+50ALALALALALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU TALKING LALALALALALALALA
- HumanNouveau, on 10/28/2008, -1/+22"Analyst?" You're using that term rather loosely. She's a voice and a face. But agree that it's a stark contrast between reason and demagoguery.
  - diggduggDOOM, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Maybe they meant "analist."
- MiserableTruth, on 10/28/2008, -1/+11I give Bill a lot of credit. If it had been me, somewhere in that interview, maybe just at the end before she made that self serving line about Fox being "fair and balanced" or when she said thanks for being here or whatever, I would have just said "Go ***** yourself" and walked off.
  - Ridonkulus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2kinda like cheney
MikeyPow, on 10/28/2008, -28/+104LOVED IT! If I could digg it twice I would.
- RedViper1999, on 10/28/2008, -0/+13I saw this live because I was waiting at the car shop and it was on. Normally never watch it and this just reminded me why. I couldn't believe when she said that Fox was the most fair and balanced of the news channels.
  - Lucas123, on 10/28/2008, -17/+1Fox News totally owned Bill Burton. It's actually really ironic that Burton, someone embraced and championed by the Daily Kos, a site that couldn't publish an unbaised viewpoint if its existance depended on it, is accusing Fox of being unfair and not balanced.
    And, if anything, Burton just talked over Megan over and over again. She patiently waited for him to finish his retorts, while he sarcastically cut her off several times.
    And actually, given a comparison, channels like MSNBC are far more left-wing biased than Fox News is ever right-leaning.
  - elhaf, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2The dailykos is a Democratic advocacy site, it says so right up front. Fakes News pretends to be fair and balanced, when they are slanted rightward. I don't understand why they don't own up to that.
- Dinsdale77, on 10/28/2008, -0/+7According to the evangelical and conservative catholic viewer base, Fox News is fair and balanced, and will probably be the only network to get into heaven.
krait, on 10/28/2008, -28/+784They had angry sex shortly after the interview.
- kelmaster1, on 10/28/2008, -44/+122That bitch needs a dick in her mouth to shut her up.
  - temporaryescape, on 10/28/2008, -0/+60eloquently spoken.
  - MtheoryX, on 10/28/2008, -2/+7Now that's a bit uncalled for, isn't it?
    
    I think she just needs a hug.
  - shadowof44, on 10/28/2008, -0/+14A penis hug...
  - AnalJustice, on 10/29/2008, -3/+1your mom needs my dick in her mouth.
    
    not to shut her up or anything though
    
    she just likes it that way
  - TheKappa, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2In the mouth? She needs it in the ASS. Straighten that bitch out!
- 55mph, on 10/28/2008, -10/+12lol!
- NoDitchDigging, on 10/28/2008, -2/+62Glad I'm not the only one who had that thought.
- humptyz, on 10/28/2008, -7/+4Let's get it on, baby! lol
- jtotheoe, on 10/28/2008, -28/+98comment dug down to try to get back to +69
  - Thuktun, on 10/28/2008, -1/+6Way too late now.
  - Edorey, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4reply dugg up for the same purpose
  - XxpokemasterxX, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17we could get your comment to 69 though. any takers?
  - AnalJustice, on 10/29/2008, -0/+0+ dugg
  - skyroket, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Uh oh, I had to move it to 70. Someone get it back!
  - Dugglous, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Awww crap. Digg really needs real-time update on digg count. It was 68 and then 71 after I dugg you.
  - jtotheoe, on 10/29/2008, -0/+3i love you guys.
- madrid, on 10/28/2008, -6/+14I bet she went ATM.
  - Thuktun, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4Except at Fox News, they're reversed:
    
    They talk out of their asses and spew feces from their mouths.
- honeybrass, on 10/28/2008, -2/+18I was thinking that the whole way through the interview. You can sense the sexual tension in the air. lol!
  - SmilinJoe, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8You know, I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING!
    A few years ago I knew a very religious girl at work, and me being the Atheist, I would get her all up in arms about the Religious / Atheist topic. It got to the point where we would get into heated "discussions" and then turn around and screw each other to exhaustion. This is what this "interview" comes across as..
- mm911, on 10/28/2008, -15/+4I don't think that ape-looking guy would get very far with Meghan.
  - ogmwtfbbq, on 10/28/2008, -0/+13I don't think the retard from fox news would get far with the "ape-looking" guy. Isn't it a crime to have sex with mentally challenged?
  - mm911, on 10/28/2008, -3/+2Not sure about that...I always pictured Borat's brother Bilo looking like Bill Burton.
    
    "My brother Bilo has a very funny RETARDATION!"
  - kelmaster1, on 10/28/2008, -1/+5ya, I'll give it to her. She is pretty damn hot.
  - john2kx, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4"ya, I'll give it to her. She is pretty damn hot."
    
    You can be sure she wouldn't be on Fox News if she wasn't.. Less attractive women can't hold the neocons' collective attention as long.
- mjamrst, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2hahaha- best comment ever.
- richito, on 10/28/2008, -0/+7she was 60% satisfied.
- andrewbacon, on 10/28/2008, -2/+1Ew.
- jack12345678910, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8i just checked her out. she is actually 38. which is amazing considering she is ***** hot and doesnt look over 30. and seriously though, right before the camera cuts, she looked down and smiled. i know she really enjoyed that argument. it must be hell to be married to her.
- MtheoryX, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Pics or it didn't happen!
- x1soundgarden1x, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3I would pay money for that video. Sad, but 100% true.
  - mrraven200, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2Why would you pay money for any video with hulu and thepiratebay?
- wrathoftheafe, on 10/29/2008, -0/+4hell, Lumbergh ***** her.
- davidsakh, on 10/29/2008, -0/+0I'd much rather ***** Kyra Phillips; at least I wouldn't be flooded with regret afterwards.
zenatek, on 10/28/2008, -9/+369"I know, you hate it."

Best line in the video.
- pedo, on 10/28/2008, -0/+45I liked "go to town."
- RainStreet, on 10/28/2008, -0/+21I want to buy Bill Burton a beer.
- callinthelaw69, on 10/28/2008, -0/+20What a ***** that woman is. Holy *****.
- Gosunkugi, on 10/28/2008, -0/+22I was partial to "I know you don't like being interrupted, Megyn, go ahead and interrupt me," myself.
  - john2kx, on 10/28/2008, -0/+7I liked that one as well, although I almost missed it due to that loud bitch barking at him as he said it.
- atgmac, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6"Fox is fair and balanced"
deboerpa, on 10/28/2008, -12/+61the noise is real, the news is faux. good interview though, i lol'd.
WafflesID, on 10/28/2008, -12/+373bwahaha. I love this guy. He's ***** awesome.. I hope that we still see him around after the election.

Who the ***** is she trying to fool?
- justintsmith, on 10/28/2008, -1/+107Half of America.
  
  And she is doing a pretty good job I'd say.
  - Colimus, on 10/28/2008, -0/+18It's sad really.
  - nurbsenvi, on 10/28/2008, -2/+0More like 70% of Americans.
  - Seanathan, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4It's the generation of extremely old people that buy into this stuff for some reason. I don't understand why they're so gullible.
    
    When they all die off, Fox won't have nearly as much power.
  - milktea, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1because dumb people don't multiply.
    
    wait..
- kelmaster1, on 10/28/2008, -0/+23You'd be surprised how many fools believe this *****, It's incredible actually. I got to give it to fox though, they really know how to be incredibly annoying. If you are fickle, simple minded person you fit the fox viewing profile. The average Fox viewer is similar to the anchors, they can't have a decent argument and they have to interrupt and yell loud to make their retarded point. Look I can bark louder than you can WOOF! What a bitch...
  - thh204, on 10/28/2008, -2/+1"they can't have a decent argument and they have to interrupt and yell loud to make their retarded point. Look I can bark louder than you can WOOF!"
    
    Ha! Funny, because that sounds like every liberal I've tried to have a conversation with.
- HtomSirveaux, on 10/28/2008, -3/+10"Who the ***** is she trying to fool?"
  
  Everyone in any branch of the United States Armed forces.
  - altgeeky1, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8It's true that the military tends to be pro-GOP from the top down, and at the bottom ranks you're either pro-GOP or you are quiet.
    
    However there are a LOT of newly Democratic soldiers and ex-soldiers. Useless political wars that send the middle class and poor off to fight a rich man's war of occupation... these things tend to be predictable at generating a backlash.
  - kelmaster1, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4^Agreed. My roommate was over in Iraq for a year and he's a democrat. Apparently you cannot openly bad mouth the party the president is in. He said most of the Army guys are McCain supporters, and even went as far as saying Palin is intelligent... wow.
  - sodade, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3No ***** way in hell I'd be a soldier in the US army - they haven't been put to honorable purpose in 60 years.
  - Thuktun, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Er, hello? As of a couple months ago, currently-deployed troops were donating 6:1 for Obama over McCain.
    
    I think they get it.
  - HtomSirveaux, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1...
    
    ***** sake guys, the article is about FOX News. I was referring to the fact that every military base I've been to; in every PX, lounge, bar, and waiting room with a television has FOX News playing on it.
    
    Intriguing how most jumped to the conclusion that I was bashing the average person of the Armed Services.
- scratend0788, on 10/28/2008, -0/+10he did seem like a cool guy,
  he dident let any of her ***** affect him either just sat there and smiled the way you would if a little kid was arguing with you
- lamiaconfitor, on 10/28/2008, -0/+10Anyone who believes that the loudest person is the one who makes the best point.
  - oninbonin, on 10/28/2008, -1/+0...is going to have sex with a three-toed sloth?
- saejinn, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3Herself.
- 4321234, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Some of the people all of the time.
- dogfood, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6I'd love to see this guy as Obama's press secretary if he gets elected.
- seltaeb4, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1She's just trying to get her own show by playing the "Nancy Grace" card.
ElectricRebel, on 10/28/2008, -12/+121pwnage.

Pravda is desperate. They know they can't handle Obama's machine so they do this outrageous crap.

The only thing I wish that he would have said (but he couldn't because he works for the campaign) is "your viewers only like this channel because they are brainwashed and stupid."
- drifter, on 10/28/2008, -33/+3Coming from an Obama camp worker? Seriously look at how you guys act.
  
  I hate how everyone is saying how unfair Fox is and how biased they are. How come Digg is full of only pro-obama and shoot down anything thats a real question? Hypocrites much?
  
  Case in point, i will get dugg down. Get real, to me the guy came off as a dick as much as she did. He kept giving so much sarcasm, he was acting very immature.
  - bloomanchoo, on 10/28/2008, -4/+17uh Digg, never claimed to be fair and balanced.
  - Kaput84, on 10/28/2008, -2/+14Stop trolling. Fox preys on the uneducated.
  - Breyker4711, on 10/28/2008, -1/+6Digg matches the opinions of the vast majority of its users. On top of that Digg doesn't claim to be an independent news organization which Fox does.
    
    Meaning Fox needs to be held to higher standards, which it does not meet.
  - JickBahTech, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6Sorry, was zoning out there.
    Did you say Digg you down?
    Done and done.
    Good day!
  - skippyrandom, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1i like that you tried to make a point...
    
    but too bad your point sucked.
- masterspeaks, on 10/28/2008, -0/+19@drifter I make it a point to dig down anyone who uses the "i'll get dugg down so that proves my point argument". regardless of whether they were right or wrong. The reason Digg is full of pro-obama articles is because the community is mostly made up of 18-40, college educated, males, a demographic that trends in Obama's favor. Fox has an average viewership of about 60 years old, largely uneducated and uninformed. So Fox caters to that demographic. Loud commentators (grandpa's hearing aid may be out of batteries), simple talking points (durr Obama = Socialist/Terrorist-Ayers/Racist-Wright) something their viewers will remember on the bus ride from the retirement home to the voter booth.
  - drifter, on 10/28/2008, -11/+1You are so cool, you went to college and are young. Therefore you can automatically assume Fox's viewership and even if that were true you can make fun of them not being educated.
    
    How about all the minorities voting for obama, only because he is black or only because its different from a white man. Granted its not a massive amount, but it is an amount. I would say those people are uneducated. But do i attack them? no i have tried to educate them. Also, what is educated? Going to college? I honestly know people who don't know ***** about politics but act like they do. So just because they go to College it means they know better than a trucker? Get real, and stop being an elitest.
    
    And me getting dugg down does prove my point. Someone can release a fact about Obama that Digg users would bash McCain for, yet it will get dugg down and bashed.
    
    Digg may not say it is fair and balanced. But many of you guys, the users bash others for not being fair and balanced. Yet you then are biased? Its called having character and morals and realizing you shouldnt be a ***** fake.
    
    But then again you said the age group is young people in college, and ive learned many in that group are fake and easily molded.
  - stormofswords, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4"I honestly know people who don't know ***** about politics but act like they do"
    
    Oh the irony.
    
    "Digg may not say it is fair and balanced. But many of you guys, the users bash others for not being fair and balanced."
    
    I've seen every single point raised by Pro-McCain digg users systematically addressed and disproven multiple times. Pro-Obama users can only sit there and respond to the same tired, red herring arguments so many times before they throw their hands in the air.
    
    Don't get pouty and cry when nobody here allows you to prop up your soap box and spew some propaganda.
  - masterspeaks, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3I am not assuming, I did a shadowing internship at Fox news. I was told about the demographics of their viewers by a producer. Perhaps you felt I was being elitist, but that is not the case, I am simply stating the facts. There is no question that a Fox News viewer is more uninformed than most news watching viewers if 60% still think Iraq has something to do with 9/11. If it makes you feel better CNN, Fox's largest competitor, has a viewership average of about 59 years old.
    
    Blacks only voting for Obama because he is black is one of most ridiculous arguments I have ever heard. Gore, Clinton, and Kerry all had 93%+ support among blacks in the past 3 general elections. Was that only voting that way because they were too "uneducated" to figure out Clinton or Gore weren't African American?
    
    You have forced me to digg you down yet again, spare me your persecution complex buddy. No one is arguing that people shouldn't have biases. I think we merely put JOURNALIST NEWS ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO INFORM MILLIONS a wee bit higher than some random opinions on some online comment box.
    
    There could be some brilliant truckers out there and there can be some idiots that scraped out a college degree. But I want you to think for a minute, Who is more likely to be informed about politics, the high school drop out trucker or a person who has the minimum amount of intellectual curiosity to get a college degree. That is all I am saying.
  - drifter, on 10/28/2008, -5/+1You again are being a snob and assuming a trucker won't know as much as a college student.
    
    Fact is college students are fickle as *****. They jump on whatever is cool. What happened last time? They all wanted Bush out and what happened? Horrible turnout.
    
    It's ok i am done, i dont support either candidate and thank god since you guys are apparently what make up voters? Crazy.
Revlution4ever, on 10/28/2008, -7/+517The way you know a news channel is fair and balanced?

When they don't have to say the phrase "fair and balanced" every 2 minutes.

Next time I watch fox news, my drinking word will be "fair and balanced".

Ironically, I will not be "fair and balanced" when I'm in the hospital for alcohol poisoning.
- shannobn, on 10/28/2008, -1/+73If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. - Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.
  - jezsik, on 10/28/2008, -0/+23See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda. - George Bush
  - MooseOfReason, on 10/28/2008, -7/+3"Change we can believe in."
  - axelstudios, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3"Country First."
- Peck3277, on 10/28/2008, -1/+13I love the little fair and balanced logo in the bottom right of the screen too!
  - dougwastaken, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6balanced in all caps too. HAY, WE DO GOOD JOB OF NEWSING! U REMEMBER "BALANCED BREAKFAST WEN U WER KID?! WE THAT. WE BALANCED
- Arramol, on 10/28/2008, -0/+10Fox News is like the dolt teenager getting plastered and having unprotected sex left and right to prove how adult he is. The more they try to prove it, the more they show they just have something that needs proving.
- BECoole, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2Looks like you are playing that game now.
- 5needles5, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4I loked up wikipedia page on fox news.
  
  the word "bias" had a lot of results for the news channel that claim its fair and balanced
- DiscoUnderpants, on 10/28/2008, -0/+8How about : They have actually Trade Marked the term "Fair and Balanced". Im going to trade mark the term "Angry and Confused" for my new news channel thats going to compete with fox news in its own market.
- Thuktun, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2Only crooks need to remind people constantly that they're not crooks. Run away from anything that has "completely legal!" in the advertisement, since there's generally a reason why they have to try to assure people that it's legal.
  
  Similarly, as you pointed out, the fact that Faux News keeps trumpeting the "fair and balanced" phrase is significant.
- JoeLosFeliz, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1How about "accurate"? Is that too much to ask for?
designfarts, on 10/28/2008, -12/+60What a Crazy Bitch - At the end Bill's nose was flaring - he wanted to shake her!
- kelmaster1, on 10/28/2008, -13/+23I think any self-respecting person would want to slap that bitch... Jesus. She needs a dick in her mouth NOW.
  - Chirp08, on 10/28/2008, -2/+18I completely and willfully volunteer my dick for the greater good.
  - OtterStratton, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4Well, to make this democratic, there should be other candidates for this position. I volunteer to run against you in the interests of freedom.
- costumemaker, on 10/28/2008, -0/+19WE ARE FAIR AND BALANCED BECAUSE I HAVE TO YELL AT YOU TO MAKE ALL MY POINTS!
  
  thats not news, thats a reactionary thing to do when you are attacked on a point when you know you are wrong but are too proud to admit it, so you raise your voice and yell when arguing.
  
  He stayed calm and even the whole time, she just got louder and louder.
- bewareofthecow, on 10/28/2008, -1/+2I find that her really assertive ignorance really turns me on... I just wanna ***** her hard.
yuutokun, on 10/28/2008, -64/+22Giggity goo! I'd love to ***** the bitch out of her!
- wcbb, on 10/28/2008, -0/+27Unpossible.
- apothekari, on 10/28/2008, -1/+13So...Does the Republican Party have a machine somewhere inside FOX news turning out these blond "Boobermensches"?
  I guess the paint was wearin' thin on Ann Coulter huh.
  Time to make a new one.
- cersad, on 10/28/2008, -0/+4The Republican party isn't sexist. They like women, the women just have to be attractive and non-threatening to masculinity. That's not sexist at all.
  /s
colincornaby, on 10/28/2008, -6/+166Ah, so really it's a Fox News story about Fox News.

Not surprising really.
- infiniphunk, on 10/28/2008, -0/+21Aren't they all?
  Ah, Fox News, where the journalist tells you THEIR opinion.
- madrid, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Fox Noise excels at navel gazing. It's what makes them so fair and balanced.
  /sarcasm
- yamikaze, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Fox News is now 4chan?
- arplayer2k, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1What is more appealing is that a lot of people watch FauxsNooze. A truly sad state of affairs that a good portion of the public is incapable of thinking for themselves.
  
  In other news, fraud will continue to go up, as there are a lot of idiots to swindle. I guess there really is an opportunity in very situation.
chronically420, on 10/28/2008, -10/+49of course, when somebody is making a point that contradicts faux thats the real facts, they interrupt and dont let them continue. no wonder why such devoted faux noise watchers are ignorant about obama, they keep them that way.
nosecohn, on 10/28/2008, -8/+86I don't even understand how people can watch that. What does it have to do with news or even an honest discussion of the issues. It's like a bad soap opera.
- maximoo2, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2If it's on TV, it'll probably suck.
ani625, on 10/28/2008, -11/+45No Surprises here. Typical of Fox.
ani625, on 10/28/2008, -18/+23No surprises here. Typical of Fox.
Pure pwnage of the crazy woman.
javy925, on 10/28/2008, -5/+290Fox is the least biased news channel??!?!?!?

what kind of ***** poll is that?!?
- brstilson, on 10/28/2008, -4/+94Simple. They called 150 people in Knoxville, TN with land phone lines (read: old people).
  
  This shouldn't be a surprise. ALL polls are *****. Pollsters can make polls say anything they want. There was an episode of *****! about it where they interviewed a pollster who is now working with the republicans who was saying back then that he can make a poll say anything he wants with tricky wording.
  - flip2trip, on 10/28/2008, -21/+1Which is why Øbama will lose.
  - bobartig, on 10/28/2008, -0/+23Hey, I'm from Knoxville, TN! Aw, *****, we both know that you're right...
  - Henweigh, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2It was Frank Luntz. "***** You Frank!"
  - rossnyc, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3I used to live in Knoxville. He's definitely right.
- pedo, on 10/28/2008, -4/+75she made it up. the poll actually said FOX is the least unbiased. which makes them the most biased.
- Namakemono, on 10/28/2008, -1/+19***** you, Frank!
- germ5150, on 10/28/2008, -22/+3I am sure you have never heard of Rasmussen and wouldn't trust since it is not a MSNBC spot poll. I wish people would drop the cell phone thing. You do realize that that idea was originally spouted by Al Sharpton, not to mention that my 82 year old grandmother uses a cell phone all the time.
  - erasedgod, on 10/28/2008, -0/+6Because your 82-year old grandmother is the correct sample size for the entire country.
- Superbeast2K, on 10/28/2008, -3/+15they did an internal poll
- rschenkel, on 10/28/2008, -1/+9It's a biased poll.
- UNCCEJ1010, on 10/28/2008, -1/+3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Media_and_ ...
- geneusutwerk, on 10/28/2008, -0/+17I did some digging and found what I assume is the poll she is mentioning.
  http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol ...
  "When it comes to delivering news without bias, 37% believe NPR accomplishes that goal. Thirty-six percent (36%) say the same for Fox and 32% believe it’s true of CNN. As noted earlier, just 25% believe the major broadcast networks deliver news in an unbiased manner."
  Oh and the best part:
  "Eighteen percent (18%) of conservatives see Fox News as having a liberal bias while 21% say the opposite. "
  - SplicedUp, on 10/28/2008, -9/+2Hahaha, I'm not sure whether it's more hilarious that people believe that NPR is unbiased or that Fox News is.
  - skippyrandom, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1sure, NPR has a liberal bias, but as anyone with a brain will tell you...LIFE, TRUTH, GOOD.... those things have liberal biases as well.
- Morghin, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1They interviewed their workers.
nupr, on 10/28/2008, -10/+275Fact: People who watch The Daily Show are more informed then those that watch Fox... 30 minutes of fake news is more credible

http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledg ...
- endlessmike49, on 10/28/2008, -1/+29I think you forgot that FOX News is fake news. haha.
- muttsuki, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2no wonder i feel so great every day :D
- Jeremyz0r, on 10/28/2008, -0/+5"fair and balance" Didn't she just admit that they have an agenda to defend McCain because he's not popular with the media?
  
  Hypocrites.
- voodoosteve84, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Thanks for the link ... really interesting. I wish I could favorite or somehow save comments on my Digg account.
- nevinl, on 10/28/2008, -0/+176%
  Good except for the Dow Jones question...
  
  I was thinking...um...what day was this report made and how frequently has it been updated....?
  
  Apparently it WAS 11000...my 9000 was off and I didn't see 8000...
  
  FAIL
- joinforfree, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1I would be EMBARRASSED to say that I get news from COMEDY CENTRAL. Liberals are soooo entertaining!
gospe1337, on 10/28/2008, -7/+223FOX is the least biased? LOL
- john2kx, on 10/28/2008, -2/+4Seriously, I can't help but wonder where they pulled that statistic from.
  - jasonh1234, on 10/29/2008, -0/+2I think it came from her bum.
  - seltaeb4, on 11/01/2008, -0/+1From Bizzaroworld.
- MindyB, on 10/29/2008, -0/+1Sure if you ask Fox News lovers and repugs, sure they believe they are because they never bother checking the facts or looking elsewhere for the news. Imagine if these Fox lovers ventured outside of their Foxhole, they would have apoplexy! They would all have to get taken to a mental institution!
theysayjump, on 10/28/2008, -22/+81She's hot when she's angry.
- tucsonsun13, on 10/28/2008, -1/+20she's always hot. I wasn't even paying attention to the arguments.
  - Cloudime, on 10/28/2008, -2/+4There were arguments?
  - ShogunWarPig, on 10/28/2008, -1/+10The argument was between her body and whatever she was wearing...
- TypeEE, on 10/28/2008, -2/+7The only thing Faux news have done right is choosing this anchor.
- DRUNKSLAMCHEST, on 10/28/2008, -1/+8She's angry when she's hot.
- temporaryescape, on 10/28/2008, -1/+6Hot, angry sex.
- fluxion, on 10/28/2008, -0/+3fox news has the hottest hosts, you have to give em that.
- SpeedSteamBoat, on 10/28/2008, -4/+1Hot? Man, you guys are easily fooled by a little make-up. Pause the video and actually look at her facial structure. She's completely unsymmetrical. Even on a YouTube quality video one nostril is visibly bigger and angled differently than the other! I'd bet fair money she's a total dog in real life (not to be confused with pitbull). You guys can have her.
  - john2kx, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2So you equate hotness with symmetry? That's..... interesting.
- vidar808, on 10/28/2008, -2/+1Where some people care for and desire actual JOURNALISM! others are obsessing over ***** the host...
  Come on people! It is this type of base & infantile sentimentalism that gets Mcains & Palins elected; that turns a great country into a dysfunctional government of wolves and populous of sheep divided upon wild fantasies and invented dramas.
- XxDeathxxStarxX, on 10/28/2008, -0/+2Imagine if she wasn't; then Faux viewers would have to devote their attention to the rot coming out of her mouth.
  
  Hey Lady, if you're going to make it a one woman rant don't bother inviting intelligent people to your show. Is there actually any nuanced discussion of politics anymore or is it all infotainment? I got rid of my tee vee years ago, but I can't imagine things have gotten any better.
- DrumDog2112, on 10/28/2008, -0/+1She's may appear angry to the lay-man. But don't be fooled - she's just showing him her O-face.
meghalc, on 10/28/2008, -6/+315Do all of the Fox news corrospondants recieve "LOUD VOICE" training before they can be on tv? She kinda reminds me of a Female version of O'Reilly!
- col381, on 10/28/2008, -0/+38I was thinking EXACTLY the same thing - the similarities are scary...
  - northwatuppa, on 10/28/2008, -0/+18Actually, the kind of people who watch Fox News, and I've met a number of them, are talk very loudly over w

Bill Burton Isn't Taking Any Bull From Faux Noise Channel watch!

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Bill Burton Isn't Taking Any Bull From Faux Noise Channel watch!

submitted by

What is Digg?

Top in US Elections 2008

Our Presidents’ First 100 Days in Office [Infographic]thumb

Related by Keyword

Burton European Open Snowboard Championships: Board meeting

Discovery's Science Channel is Looking for a Few Good Geeks

Bull Riders Wait All Day for a Few Seconds of Fury