digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Arizona superdelegate pledges vote for Obama!

azcentral.com — Sen. Barack Obama picked up another superdelegate today at the Arizona Democratic Party's state convention... Charlene Fernandez, chairwoman of the Yuma Democratic Party, was chosen the state party's first vice chairwoman, a position that carries with it superdelegate status.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • motivatedmama, on 04/28/2008, -9/+47All week long and every third article...more support for the next President of the United States!
    • relic180, on 04/28/2008, -28/+5If Obama wins, it will only be because the Bilderberg Group decided he will allow the greatest opportunity for fiscal profit. He's just another major party candidate. Period.
      • nreynolds, on 04/28/2008, -1/+10I'm going to believe you, but only because you sound crazy.
        • masterm1nd, on 04/28/2008, -2/+1I'm going to go ahead and assume this is a conspiracy and you work for Reynolds wrap. That is, if Reynolds is your real name.
      • forgiste, on 04/28/2008, -5/+3Or, is it possible that the Bilderberg Group has been trying like hell to kill his support by launching media attacks against him, but they didn't take the internet into account? You gotta remember, the web changes everything.
        • jgtg32a, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6Only 56% of the US uses the internet, and I'm willing to be most just do the Email routine.
        • mehan, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2yeah, the web changed everything for Ron Paul, sure.
        • Stevanoski, on 04/28/2008, -3/+2transmission complete, please adjust tinfoil hat.
      • kipmartin, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1got out the butterfly catchers! here's another one with an aluminum hat!
      • toastybeast, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1and you're just another blanket statement. say something useful.
    • Stevanoski, on 04/28/2008, -18/+3Your right, go Hillary.
    • winnestow, on 04/28/2008, -11/+1Barack Hussein Obama quote from AUDACITY OF HOPE…
      “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
      Question: Do you supporters know what you are doing?
      • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Mmmmm, quote mining. Tastes good, like propaganda.
  • thirdcoastborn, on 04/28/2008, -24/+10where's hillary's support?
    • gsxrjason, on 04/28/2008, -8/+25Over in the republican camp.
    • forgiste, on 04/28/2008, -4/+8In the trash.
    • chrisp9446, on 04/28/2008, -6/+3exactly...
    • threemagic, on 04/28/2008, -5/+1I heard she's going to offer sex to virgins for support for her cause next...
    • toastybeast, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2oh wow. you couldn't've asked that question without knowing you'd get your ***** rocked.
    • chrissku, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Well lets see she has CNN and ABC doing everything they can to get her elected.
  • brad3378, on 04/28/2008, -41/+8Free Healthcare for EVERYBODY!
    This is awesome!
    I'm going to get my teeth whitened, LASIK, Lipo, a penis enlargement, and some botox in my buttocks.

    Seriously though - how will we decide which procedures should be covered?
    Do the youth of America want to obligate ourselves to paying for expensive knee operations for fat ***** 80 year olds that can't take care of their health? With the old folks retired (and no longer paying income taxes) which generations should pick up the tab? If our $30,000 per citizen national debt was important, I'd say that the old folks should be paying their own way before we give them another entitlement. Forget the war on terror - Our debt is the real threat to America's survival: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
    • badnewshotel, on 04/28/2008, -18/+5Best comment I've seen in a month.
    • mbonzo531, on 04/28/2008, -7/+6We should not forget our war on terror... it is the major reason we have debt in the first place. People want to vote for a democrat to bring foreign spending home so that it goes to things such as healthcare. Yes we need to settle the debt, but we can do that at the same time we offer healthcare. As for teeth whitening and what not... I hope you're aware of how private insurance covers these proceedures.
      • noahhoward, on 04/28/2008, -2/+2You forget about how we couldn't afford it when we had a surplus?
    • Scheissen, on 04/28/2008, -7/+5You offer too much logic for these Diggers. You will be dugg down.
    • Stevanoski, on 04/28/2008, -8/+3Sigh, what has happened to the party of compassion?
    • forgiste, on 04/28/2008, -4/+1Actually, the more debt we have the more money we're allowed to print. The real enemy is that system itself, the Federal Reserve. Also, I may be wrong, but I don't think that free healthcare covers cosmetic surgeries.
      • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+1You're not wrong, but it's a lot easier to attack Free Healthcare when you turn it into a strawman like he did. Love to check his "facts", but sadly his links are broken. Someone already killed his false statistics on the Bush/Clinton tax amounts though, so I'm willing to postulate there is a similiar breakdown in his other numbers. How does an illegal immigrant get welfare in the first place anyway? I'm pretty sure it requires citizenship.
    • jbenson2, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6Thanks sonny, just keep paying your taxes to pay for the retired folks and the baby boomers. Certainly appreciate it.
    • Dested, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6It works in other countries you know... Are you saying that americans are to greedy to have free healthcare?
      • yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -4/+3"free" healthcare? Just the fact that you think it's free says a lot about your understanding of the issue.
  • thirdcoastborn, on 04/28/2008, -6/+33hillary's plan will garnish your wages if you don't purchase health insurance.
    • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -7/+6As it should be. Otherwise you're going to see people on tight budgets opting out of healthcare to save a few bucks.
      • Azriel7, on 04/28/2008, -2/+3Lets see, pay bills and put food on the table or buy health insurance? Decisions..decisions....
        • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -5/+1Look, who doesn't have health insurance? Smart people? No. Chimps. Chimps don't have health insurance and they aren't likely to spend money on it unless they have to. Which means that when they get sick they can't pay their hospital bills. Chimps need to be forced to buy health insurance. Health care being optional defeats the entire purpose of having a national health care system. Cause you don't need a national health care system to take care of people who have their ***** together. You need it for chimps who don't know a damn thing about planning for their futures.
      • EllimistX, on 04/28/2008, -2/+3What if I don't care to get healthcare coverage.... I will not be forced into getting something I don't want, regardless of budget. That's my problem with this plan.
        • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -3/+1Really? So you don't pay taxes? Cause we force you to pay for all kinds of things you probably don't want every year. And you have a problem with having health care? Just don't want to be patched-up if something falls on you? See, that's exactly why it shouldn't be optional. Chimps won't think it's important enough to spend their cigarette money on.
          • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2That it is something I would not deny does not give anyone the right to use my money to buy it. That's the basic rule all government should follow.
          • gsxrjason, on 04/29/2008, -1/+1The Health Care tax would be the only tax in this country you have to pay for being alive. All other taxes are a result of something; income, purchases, etc.
          • EllimistX, on 04/29/2008, -1/+1I pay taxes, it's the sucky part of being single and making decent money... But I also have a disease that I know will kill me in the next 15 years or so if I don't get the medicine to treat it. I know my dad's insurance used to raise hell about paying $36,000 every two weeks for it back when I was under his insurance, so I just got off of it. I'd rather not have to lose money in taxes paying for something that probably won't cover what I need, so I made my peace with my disease and just don't care about it anymore...
        • slabdigger, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Healthcare would be one of the taxes I would most be happy to pay. At least with a national health care plan, you get something directly for your money. And more importantly, every single US company becomes more profitable. oh. Except the insurance companies.
      • mega-volt, on 04/28/2008, -1/+3Isn't it our right as Americans to decide our own budget?
        • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -1/+1No. You don't get to decide whether or not you're going to pay for the police, the fire department, the roads, the military, your retirement and hopefully soon your medical coverage.
    • yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -7/+4And Obama is going to take your money to pay for your deadbeat neighbor that "can't" pay for his own healthcare. Here's a thought - cut spending enough to finance your socialized medicine.
      • Lazydriver, on 04/28/2008, -2/+7Seriously, shut the ***** up you elitest cow. You have no idea on how poor people got to where they are, so really, shut the ***** up unless you are one.
        • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4OH lawd, don't you know that poor people are always lazy and stupid? It's scientific fact that rich people are smart, handsome, well-mannered, and generally superior people! Just look at the original poster!

          Oh. Wait. I nearly forgot about how that statement is so completely erroneous it's silly.
          • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -6/+1How long's it been again since a rich person was executed by the state?
    • Norma156, on 04/28/2008, -2/+1Honey, both Barrack and Hillary have announced they'll garnish your wages. What do you think repealing the Bush tax cuts are going to do for you?
  • Pherdnut, on 04/28/2008, -6/+5I really need to do some googling to see if it's just the Digg bias or if aside from those 3 a week or two ago that the Clintonistas were spazzing over, Hillary just isn't getting the endorsements at all.
    • marabout40, on 04/28/2008, -4/+5I believe she got a NH delegate yesterday.
    • yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+6Digg bias toward Obama!?!?!? Say it ain't so!
  • cheezeme, on 04/28/2008, -24/+8This is great news. This locks in McCain as our next president. At least will win the war.
    • zappa027, on 04/28/2008, -0/+5Who will win the war?
    • DeejayPancake, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Wtf? We'll win the war? Oh yes, sir, we'll win it. After years of our men dying, and the fact that we're already plenty of men down. But no fear, Iraq'll totally thank us in the end.
    • TheSwashbuckler, on 04/28/2008, -0/+9We CANNOT win the war - the war is between the Iraqis. We're just in the middle.
      • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Additionally, the 'war on terror' is rather directly a war on the fundie islam world. I'm not saying this is a terrible thing, but it intellectually dishonest to go around saying we're fighting against an emotion when we're rather explicitly fighting against people whos core beliefs are based on "(paraquote) kill or convert thy neighbor"

        Mind you, I'm talking rather strictly about the fundies here - the muslims who believe in the reward for their own martyrdom* enough to martyr themselves via homebrew explosives, 911'ing planes, and otherwise sacrificing themselves to kill 'infidels'.

        * The reward for martyrdom in islam is eternity in paradise for you and seventy of your closest friends, and the oft-ridiculed 72 virgins. Fundies believe this with the same fervor that creationists believe that 6000 years have passed since the formation of the earth, or that devout catholics believe a dry bit of overprocessed matzo is really the body of christ, or that secularists and atheists believe that water is wet. Please don't use this fact as validation of your religion over islam; use it as a real and tangible reason for educating people and training them in the ways of rational thinking.

        Seriously. People need to get over this god *****.
  • had3l, on 04/28/2008, -6/+29FTA: "as the neck-in-neck race for the Democratic nomination continues with New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.". What neck-in-neck race?
    • bfrank72, on 04/28/2008, -3/+6Necks inside of necks!?
    • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -7/+3The one with less than a 2% difference in total votes cast between the two candidates.
    • synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -1/+10The manufactured one engineered to keep ratings high after a year-long campaign.
    • yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+7You should pay attention more and stop getting all your news from Digg comments.
  • lordenlil, on 04/28/2008, -10/+10I really wish Hillary would just end her campaign already- the damage she's doing to the Democratic party may very well be irreversible.
    • Norma156, on 04/28/2008, -1/+1Good.
    • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -1/+1Me, I hope she goes all the way. I'm not one for spite, so I won't normally say, "so and so needs shot for what they're doing", or whatever, but if she goes all the way to the convention, it's inevitable that she'll ruin her own finances. I'd love to see the manipulative liar go broke on her own miscognizance and have nothing to show for it.
  • empirefalling, on 04/28/2008, -13/+9Obama will be your next Leader, of this there is no doubt. Now is the time to think of what actions you can take to reverse the damage done by Obamas predecessor. If Obama is indeed dedicated to "Change" then he will need your help. Bringing your military troops back to US soil is top priority. Nationalization of Health Care comes next.
    • pyronik, on 04/28/2008, -3/+7next, we can take all the money of rich people and divide it among the poor by creating a wealth tax.. They dont need it!! Go Obama!!!!
      • empirefalling, on 04/28/2008, -7/+2What better way to redistribute wealth? Would you rather take it from them by force?
        • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4I can't fathom why anyone would need over 200,000 a year for a family of five. If mine can survive in what I consider pretty good conditions on 100,000 then really there isn't any good reason to have more.

          Well, I guess people got to have computers and flat screens in every room, by God.
          • pyronik, on 04/30/2008, -0/+1i can't fathom why u think its your decision to make... why should i work and do something of value in the world and then someone else, who didn't do the work says "Where's mine?". Thats not freedom thats slavery
    • bclinton, on 04/28/2008, -7/+1How about he deports you to Canada - They deserve you....
  • nitsnipe, on 04/28/2008, -4/+3Please get this race over with, everyone is getting really tired from hearing only words. WE WANT ACTION.
  • Stevanoski, on 04/28/2008, -4/+13What a crooked way to run an election, super delegates my arse, let the people vote.
    • npsken, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1The people never even directly vote anyway...
      Everything can change in January in the real election, but it's unlikely.
      • korvan504521, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1wait, what?
      • Zaius, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2the election is in November, ass.
        • npsken, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1You clearly have no knowledge as to how our election system works. In November you are voting for representatives to go cast a vote in the real election in January. These representatives are aloud to CHANGE THEIR VOTE. It is not very likely that votes will be changed BUT IT HAS HAPPENED.

          Ass.
    • yojiffyskippy, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4The Dems can't trust the voters to make a decision like that.
      • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2As opposed to the winner-take-all system of the Republican nomination? I'm pretty sure the entire population of a state does not support any one candidate, but the way it's set up they can sure pretend like it does.
    • Lazydriver, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2Barack's won all popular and delegate votes so far anyway.

      Don't be so sure yet that the delegates have turned.
    • yellowfish04, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2dammit, after reading the word "crooked" my brain forced me to read "election" as "erection"
    • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1For once, I agree with you. Without the carrot of superdelegates, Hillary would be out by now.
  • br0wnstar, on 04/28/2008, -3/+23Well damn. Charlene Fernandez has decided? Hillary is bound to quit now.
    • ZiggityZhang, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6well, now it's what, another 41 superdelegates for Obama to cinch the nomination? everyone of them counts toward it.
    • yellowfish04, on 04/28/2008, -0/+6Well we're all familiar with the old adage, "As goes Charlene Fernandez, so goes the rest of the nation."
  • dannyboy3020, on 04/28/2008, -9/+8North Carolina voter promises to vote for Obama on May 6 primaries!!!

    I like Obama as much as the next digger...but these articles are pretty redundant now.
    • bclinton, on 04/28/2008, -8/+5Woooooah....An Obama Butt Boy defecting the ranks. You will pay dude.....
    • synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -4/+6Obama Butt Boy? What are you, nine?
      • insomniac8400, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2Worse, he is a Hillary supporter.
  • bclinton, on 04/28/2008, -21/+3Woohooo - Calling all Obama Butt Boys to Digg this up. Their man Osama (ooops I mean Obama) might get another vote.
    • makkaveli19, on 04/28/2008, -0/+7OMG THAT WAS AMAZING, OSAMA AND OBAMA OMG THEY ARE RELATED!
      dumbass
    • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Don't be fooled; bclinton is not in fact Bill; he's Bruce Clinton - famous for his decades long career in gay german shiza porn. He practically invented 2 girls 1 cup!.

      See, look! I can make ad hominem attacks up on the spot too!
  • Genetico, on 04/28/2008, -0/+8As happy as I am to hear more support for Obama; I still Can't get over my frustration over the tedious and useless need for super delegates. All these extra rules for circumstances that don't even apply to this age just make things confusing and give Americans less of an urge to participate in the election process.
    • akatsuki, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3They had a valid reason for a specific instance of hijacking of the party by radical interests. Just not a campaign where both people are in the Democratic fold...

      Dean has hinted at changing the system which would be good - they need to weigh the system more for general electability by discounting solidly Dem states where the candidate doesn't matter and weigh swing states much heavier to determine electability with also an eye towards electoral college proportions (e.g. if the state is proportional federally, then that is how Dem delegates should go). Superdelegates should vote based on how it advances the Democratic agenda in their region. (I know these factors are strong Obama points, but this is for after this nomination process anyway).

      Basically the system should be set up to create a stronger party every election cycle and to make strong advances.
  • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -12/+2All this good news and he's still going to watch Senator Clinton get the nomination in Denver. Must make him a little weepy.
    • withincontext, on 04/28/2008, -1/+7*yawn*
    • synaesthesia, on 04/28/2008, -1/+11Yea, OBAMA is the weepy one. Riiiight.
      • RRJackson, on 04/28/2008, -6/+1I'm sure he realizes by now that he can't secure the nomination by Denver and that the entire playing field will change when it's all up to the DNC.
        • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2Wow. Your willful blindness is astounding.
  • DEIx15x8, on 04/28/2008, -20/+4Barack Hussein Obama is different and different is good. We must give him different treatment because he isn't white. He is black and that means that he thinks in a different way than everyone else but remember different isn't deficient.
  • shiftclick, on 04/28/2008, -13/+1Superdelegates can be wrong too. They are just people you dumbass! Barack Hussein Obama ISSS different! He has NOOOO experience unlike the other candidates! www.dontvoteobama.com
  • Kas70, on 04/28/2008, -3/+2Barack Handsome Obama

    Loses it's divisive power when you translate the name doesn't it.
    • consonance, on 04/28/2008, -1/+3Barack is also a semitic word, so that means the Democratic frontrunner is...

      Lightning Handsome Obama. Sounds like a hobo name a la John Hodgman.
      • Bronowyn, on 04/28/2008, -1/+2I think he must be hiding an alterego ala superman.

        In the air, it is a bird, a plane? No it's LIGHTNING. Isn't he dreamy????

        ;)
    • Fordi, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Eh, by the same token, taking my full name into account, I'm Lord High Who is Like God?, my God is Yaweh.

      The meaning of a name is rather moot, I think.
  • darkciti2, on 04/28/2008, -2/+4This is great news. We should write/fax/email this delegate and thank them for their decision.

    Positive affirmation is much more effective than negativity.
  • Jaguwar, on 04/28/2008, -4/+4475 DIGGS HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
    475 people thought this was a really really interesting story
    or

    could it be 475 Obama supporters who want to turn DIGG into their own personal bumper sticker.
    • DeejayPancake, on 04/28/2008, -2/+0No. It's people like you, me, and the other several hundred users that cannot help ourselves on the internet.

      HMMMMMMM?
    • kday, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3I'll go with #2.

      There are new superdelegates every day pledging votes for Obama and Hillary. This front-page story is just as bad as the MSM spam you see on CNN and Fox News.

      I have nothing against political news, but articles like this really aren't newsworthy. Is there anyone willing to contradict this statement? If so, please let me know why.
  • poopdigger, on 04/28/2008, -2/+2WOOT! Obama is still going to wiN! Snore..
  • cafesuada, on 04/28/2008, -2/+6I thought Hillary won Arizona. Then shouldn't the super delegate vote with the popular vote and go with Hillary?
    • bphicke, on 04/28/2008, -1/+5The Democratic Party is not very democratic.
      • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+4But giving an entire state's population's vote to one candidate certainly is. Guess what bozo, the electoral system is broken no matter which party you're on.
    • Norma156, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Yes.
    • bond1963, on 04/28/2008, -0/+0That's only true if Obama wins the state. You should have known that since you posted on digg.
  • zephris, on 04/28/2008, -3/+1How many people out there actually know what a superdelegate is??? If you really knew, you wouldn't be jumping up and down...
    • adwarereport, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1Actually, I am jumping up and down. I want to know about every new superdelegate who is pledging their support for Obama. Why? Because when there are 39 more, it's over.
    • kerowack, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1At this point, we're all very aware of what a superdelegate is, thank you.
  • feiniulacht, on 04/28/2008, -7/+1Stupid Democrats, paychecks are for working people, but most the people on welfare are voting for a liberal Democrat, and Obama won't make it to the white house. There are too many white people who know the score, and we are not going to throw our vote away to please a bunch of illegals and low life welfare recipients, who do nothing but lay around and produce more babies who will grow up to be just like their parents. More low liefs for the Sharptons and the Jacksons of the ghetto Seine to speak for because they are told they need these ghetto pimps to stand up for them. Neither Billary or Mama will ever get their traitorous butts into the white house because they have too much baggage and they are untruthful. You can call it racist all you want; I don't have any empathy for freeloaders and fools, so bend over cause here they come. Yohembi baby!
    • InnerRayg, on 04/28/2008, -1/+3***** off *****, the only one who denigrates people on welfare is someone born into wealth and who assumes they deserve it.

      Go ahead, tell me that the people in my community are not the hardest workers I know, because they have to work every day and night just to make enough to feed their families. Tell me that my parents have not done more work than you ever will to make a nice living for me. Tell me that so I can laugh in yo face idiot.
  • mahsah, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2I wish Clinton would concede already so Obama can beat the ***** out of McCain.

    Although I personally will be voting for Gravel, especially now that he is on the Libertarian ticket.
  • davidlow, on 04/28/2008, -1/+1You're voting for Gravel? Why not Ralph Nader?
  • chrissku, on 04/28/2008, -0/+3The thing I thing has disappointed me the most in this election would have to be the media. It is really sad how they have see sawed weekly between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. We all know Obama has this nomination won. There is simply no way that the superdelegates will overturn his popular vote and pledged delegate count lead. The only reason why Hillary thinks she has a shot is because our "unbiased" media keeps telling her she does. This whole thing is f'in ridiculous.
    • bond1963, on 04/28/2008, -0/+0I wouldn't count on that as a rule. Remember there are many supers that have already committed for Billary even though Obama won in their area/state. And there are supers that haven't commited even though the people in their area have voted a long time ago. Why is that? Because they don't feel like they have to vote in line with the popular vote.

      I'm not saying it's right. I'm not saying they won't rubber stamp the popular vote. I'm just saying that it would be a mistake to assume anything at this point.
  • seantaylor, on 04/29/2008, -0/+1As Sen. Hillary Clinton has ‘managed’ to take the Pennsylvania state, the Democratic race for nomination is very much alive – and most likely to be decided by superdelegates. Indiana ,Idaho and West Virginia are still to come.

    If you’re tired of waiting around for those super delegates to make a decision already, go to LobbyDelegates.com and push them to support Clinton or Obama

    If you haven't done so yet, please write a message to each of your state's superdelegates at http://www.lobbydelegates.com


    It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Obama in office?!

    Sending a note to current Obama supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Clinton supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Obama, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Obama. It's that easy...

    Clinton Supporters too …. !

    It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Clinton in office?!

    Sending a note to current Clinton supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Obama supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Clinton, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Clinton. It's that easy...

    REALLY easy to identify the superdelegates and reach out to them! It includes a list of names, addresses, and affiliations of superdelegates from each state including your state
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.